• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

UNCTAD Official: Need For Policy Coherence In Local Pharmaceutical Production

17/07/2015 by Ani Mamikon for Intellectual Property Watch and Rishi Dhir for Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Despite progress in recent years to boost local pharmaceutical production in developing countries, policy coherence across the countries is lacking, according to an official at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).

Intellectual Property Watch sat down recently with Christoph Spennemann, a legal expert in the Intellectual Property Unit, Division on Investment and Enterprise at UNCTAD. He discussed the need for policy coherence in facilitating local pharmaceutical production in developing countries and least-developed countries (LDCs).

“In recent years, we have seen important initiatives in developing countries and least-developed countries to promote local production of pharmaceuticals as a means of health security,” said Spennemann.

“Appropriate legal and policy frameworks in interconnected areas such as investment, health, intellectual property, innovation and trade need to be in place to ensure not only economically viable production, but also increase access to high quality medicines that are essential to address the specific health needs of developing countries,” he said.

These efforts can be supported through regional integration where countries can learn from each other’s best practices. And, regionally harmonised policy and legal frameworks can trigger adaptation of national policies.

UNCTAD’s role is to assist interested developing countries and LDCs in the establishment of such legal and policy frameworks.

Spennemann recently delivered this message at an event that took place at the European Development Days in Brussels, emphasising the need for policy coherence.

UNCTAD has two additional workshops planned for September, intended to bring together various stakeholders including government and the private sector to discuss how different countries are managing the issue of local pharmaceutical production.

One workshop will take place in Thailand [doc], focusing on Thailand and Vietnam. The other workshop will take place in Uganda [doc], focusing on the East African Community (EAC).

Spennemann commented that the countries participating in the workshops could benefit from each other through their mutual exchange of experiences. He also said that one of the purpose of these events is to make recommendations to the governments with a view of improving policy coherence in local pharmaceutical production.

The EAC, Spennemann said, has followed the model of policy alignment in various ways. For example, the EAC has phased out tariffs on pharmaceutical inputs, and has harmonised the drug regulation framework. Also, the implementation of the EAC Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Plan for Africa is promoting local pharmaceutical production.

But a problem that persists for the EAC, according to Spennemann, is its inability to find an appropriate response to counterfeit and substandard drugs. The EAC member states have responded in a way that contradicts the principle of policy coherence, he said.

For example, Kenya introduced an Anti-Counterfeit Act and Uganda introduced a Counterfeit Goods Bill. Both pieces of law included broad definitions of “counterfeit” which, Spennemann explained, carried the risk of capturing generic drug producers.

Ani Mamikon is an intern at Intellectual Property Watch. She recently completed her Juris Doctor at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. She holds a Master’s Degree in Political Science and International Security Studies. She has a strong interest various IP issues relating to privacy, human rights and information technology. Recently, she has also developed a keen interest in patent law.

Rishi Dhir is an intern at Intellectual Property Watch. He holds a Juris Doctor with honours from the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. He also holds dual Bachelor Honour Degrees in Mathematics and Business Administration from the University of Waterloo and Wilfrid Laurier University. Rishi has an interest in a variety of IP issues including copyright law, piracy and Internet governance.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Ani Mamikon may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Rishi Dhir may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"UNCTAD Official: Need For Policy Coherence In Local Pharmaceutical Production" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Africa, Asia/Pacific, Development, English, Health & IP, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Regional Policy, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, United Nations - other

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.