SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Interns Summer 2013

IP-Watch interns Brittany Ngo (Yale Graduate School of Public Health) and Caitlin McGivern (University of Law, London) talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Quantitative Analysis Of Contributions To NETMundial Meeting

A quantitative analysis of the 187 submissions to the April NETmundial conference on the future of internet governance shows broad support for improving security, ensuring respect for privacy, ensuring freedom of expression, and globalizing the IANA function, analyst Richard Hill writes.


Latest Comments
  • Why should anyone care what James Anaya thinks? In... »
  • If this goes ahead, as the EU will "speak" for all... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    WIPO Agrees To 2014-2015 Programme And Budget After Discussion On External Offices

    Published on 10 December 2013 @ 11:04 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    In the nick of time, the World Intellectual Property Organization has agreed on a budget for the new biennium – which starts in three weeks.

    Today marked the opening of a three-day extraordinary General Assembly, during which delegates must complete unfinished work from the annual General Assembly meeting in September. Critically important was the approval of the program and budget for the 2014-2015 biennium, which delegates managed to do after several hours of informal consultations on the sensitive issue of creating new WIPO external offices around the world.

    The 52nd Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO is taking place from 10-12 December.

    A decision [pdf] by General Assembly Chair Päivi Kairamo of Finland was adopted at the end of today’s session, after a proposal [pdf] by the Group of Latin American and Caribbean (GRULAC) countries was tabled this morning, then withdrawn at the end of the day.

    The budget [pdf] for the next biennium is the same as presented at the September session of the Program and Budget Committee. It shows an overall income in 2014/2015 of CHF 713 million (US$ 763 million) and CHF 674 million (US$ 659 million) during the same biennium.

    The chair blamed the September Assembly’s inability to finish its work in part on an overloaded agenda. Some of the work that had to be tackled by the Assembly should have been completed in different committees, she said.

    WIPO Director General Francis Gurry urged delegates to complete, over the next three days, “what has been a very good year for the organisation.”

    Proposal On Future External Offices Out

    The decision adopted by members today was a revision of a 6 December proposed decision [pdf] submitted by Kairamo, which she revised following informal consultations yesterday.

    The adopted decision by the chair approved the proposed Program and Budget for the 2014/2015 biennium subject to some changes, including the formulation of targets in the results framework of Program 2 (Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications), and of Program 4 (Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expressions and Genetic Resources), as showed in the annex of the revised draft decision. An example of a change is that there would be a possible diplomatic conference negotiation on an industrial design treaty, rather than mandating it.

    The adopted decision also deleted paragraph 20.21 (New External Offices) of Programme 20 (External Relations, Partnerships and External Offices) in an effort to separate the issue of new WIPO external offices from the adoption of the Program and Budget.

    Paragraph 20.21 had read as follows: “During the next biennium, new external offices in the following locations/regions are planned: China, Russian Federation, United States of America and two in Africa. It is recognized that the establishment of external offices is a process that will not be complete in the 2014-2015 biennium. The existing offices and the newly established ones need to be monitored and the results achieved through them evaluated. Requests for further offices remain unsatisfied as yet. Ultimately, the number of external offices needs to be sustainable and ideally would constitute a limited global network of strategically placed offices.”

    The adopted decision allocates CHF 0.6 million (US$ 0.67 million) in non-personnel resources for the new WIPO external offices in China and Russia (for which contracts have already been signed by WIPO), and CHF 0.9 million (US$ 1.01 million) in non-personnel resources as unallocated for possible new offices.

    Trinidad and Tobago on behalf of GRULAC put forward the proposal that paragraph 20.21 be suspended instead of deleted, so that the decision allows for further discussion on external offices. It called for the suspension of paragraph 20.21 for further consideration and final decision by the Program and Budget Committee at its 23th session. It also called for the addition of the mention of one external office in Latin America and the Caribbean in paragraph 20.21, according to an earlier GRULAC proposal [pdf], from the September Assembly.

    Several countries spoke in support of the chair’s proposed decision, such as India, South Korea, and the Group B developed countries. The African Group said the GRULAC proposal was interesting and worthy of further consideration.

    A number of GRULAC members underlined that they did not intend to hinder the process of adopting the program and budget. Several of them suggested more time be given to delegations so that they can study the GRULAC proposal. The chair held informal consultations for most of the day to reach consensus.

    The discussion on the opening of new WIPO external offices started at the July session of the Program and Budget Committee (PBC) (IPW, WIPO, 9 July 2013) when WIPO presented member states with a proposal to open five new external offices: China, Russia, the United States and two in Africa to the dismay of the GRULAC and other candidate countries who said they were left out of the process.

    A New Process for External Offices

    Member states then asked that clear guidelines be developed to identify potential new external offices. The guidelines will also be discussed this week. A proposal [pdf] has been tabled by GRULAC, Group B, the group of Central European and Baltic States, and India on “General Principles Regarding WIPO External Offices.”

    After the adoption of decision on the Program and Budget, the African Group asked that a statement be annexed to the decision. The statement said that the decision to dissociate the discussion on external offices from the decision on the Program and Budget should not prevent the continuity of the discussion about the two WIPO external offices in Africa. Africa, the Algerian delegate said, is the only continent with no WIPO external office.

    WIPO’s legal counsel said no statement could be annexed to the decision but would be annexed to the report to reflect the opinion expressed by the African Group.

    Several Items Left on Agenda

    Still on the agenda [pdf] of the resumed Assembly this week is: a potential diplomatic conference to finalise a procedural treaty on industrial designs, the establishment of guiding principles for WIPO’s external offices, the reporting of the Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS), and the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) – which is scheduled to meet next week.

    Delegates have been working intensely over the last two months to facilitate work this week, the chair said. Remaining issues were divided in three strands, she said. Ambassador Kwok Fook Seng of Singapore was tasked with consultations regarding external offices, while Marcello Della Nina from Brazil, held consultations regarding the treaty on industrial designs.

    Kairamo said she held informal consultations on the SCCR and the CWS.

     

    Catherine Saez may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. WIPO Assembly: Potential Design Treaty Misses Train To Russia In June, Still On Track For 2014 | Intellectual Property Watch says:

      […] Five new WIPO external offices were proposed by WIPO at the July Program and Budget (PBC) meeting, one in China, one in Russia, two in Africa, and one in the United States. The China and Russia offices – which already had signed contracts with the WIPO secretariat – were agreed upon this week. The fate of the three other offices remained uncertain, although the agreed budget has allocated funds for additional external offices (IPW, WIPO, 10 December 2013). […]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 157.55.35.48