SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

To What Extent Can Global IP Rules Be Responsive To Public Interest Demands? The Case Of The Treaty For The Visually Impaired

To what extent can global intellectual property rules address in an effective manner the needs of the most vulnerable members of society? This is the key question with which member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) are faced as they prepare to meet next week for a diplomatic conference, in Marrakesh, that should result in the adoption of a treaty to facilitate access to copyrighted works by visually impaired persons and persons with print disabilities.


Interview With Tanja Rajić: The Impact Of EU Enlargement On Trademark Practice In Croatia

Ten years after applying for membership, Croatia is finally joining the European Union on 1 July 2013. Tanja Rajić, senior associate at PETOSEVIC, explains how six years of accession negotiations and the adoption of the acquis communautaire have affected intellectual property protection in Croatia and prepared it for becoming a member state.





Latest Comments
  • We've taken a detailed look at the Myriad decision... »
  • “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BLUEPRINT 2014-2020”by Jeon... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WIPO Patent Law Committee Cinches Agreement On Future Work

    Published on 1 March 2013 @ 5:51 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    With the threat of suspension of work looming, the World Intellectual Property Organization Standing Committee of the Law of Patents (SCP) agreed to a minimal programme of work, which includes exceptions and limitations to patent rights, quality of patents, and patents and health. Delegates made significant concessions on all sides, but the Africa Group expressed particular disappointment in the limited commitment to work on the patents and health topic.

    The 19th session of the WIPO patent law committee met this week from 25-28 February, adjourning near midnight on the last day. Although member states remained divided on key issues, most were relieved to have come to an agreement.

    Meeting documents are available here.

    According the chair’s summary [pdf], future work includes exceptions and limitations to patent rights, quality of patents, including opposition systems, patents and health, confidentiality of communications between clients and their patent advisors, and transfer of technology.

    Meeting Chair Vittorio Ragonesi, legal adviser for the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told Intellectual Property Watch, “The work programme is very minimal, but at least, we’ll keep working. It’s very important that we continue because this is the only multilateral forum to work on the international patent system.”

    Toward the end of informal negotiations on 28 February, debate narrowed in on patents and health and quality of patents. The Africa Group pushed hard for more ambitious work on patents and health, included exploration of obstacles countries face using health-related patent flexibilities. Group B, representing developed countries, meanwhile wanted to move forward on a questionnaire to identify definitions and criteria used by member states in defining quality of patents. These priorities are reflected in the “Draft informal proposal by the Chair on future work in the SCP,” [pdf] which circulated earlier in the day.

    Low Ambition on Patents and Health…

    Following the meeting close, a delegate from a developed country said, “Our biggest win this week was not running this committee into the sand.” But for others, the pressure to keep the committee alive resulted in too many concessions.

    During the closing remarks, Algeria, on behalf of the Africa Group, said, “The SCP must make more consequential and useful progress on patents and health. Our countries suffer on a daily basis of a status quo imposed by a patent system that only considers the demands of rights holders.”

    “At the end of this session, the African Group found itself alone with the responsibility to continue or to block the work of this committee. Faced with this choice, the group decided it favoured the committee, and the work of this organisation,” the delegate from Algeria said. “We hope that the Group will not have to save this committee every session.”

    According to the chair’s summary, on patents and health, members agreed to “Organize during SCP/20 a sharing session on countries’ use of health-related patent flexibilities.”

    As expressed in their opening statement [doc], for the Africa Group, exploring challenges countries face in making use of health-related patent flexibilities was a top priority, as outlined in the proposal submitted by South Africa on behalf of the Africa Group and the Development Agenda Group (SCP/16/17). This proposal was also supported by the Asia Group.

    This proposition was strongly opposed by Group B, representing developed countries, which favoured the US delegation’s proposal (SCP/17/11) on studying how the patent system promotes public health.

    Nonetheless, several representatives of developing countries expressed relief outside of the meeting that the patents and health topic remained part of the SCP’s future work.

    …And Low Ambition on Quality of Patents

    If patents and health was the near-redline for the Africa Group, and other developing countries, quality of patents was the equivalent for the US and other developed countries.

    The United States’ opening statement [pdf] focussed on progress the country has made in aligning the patent system to its international partners with the implementation of America Invents Act (AIA) and the “first inventor to file” provision. The US delegate also pointed to “initiatives aimed at improving the quality and efficiency of the patent examination process” through work sharing programs with partner patent office.

    In the area of patent quality, the US and other developed countries hope to make progress by moving forward with a questionnaire on quality of patents as proposed in the past by the United Kingdom and Canada (SCP/18/9).

    Reticent to any move toward international harmonisation of patent systems, the Africa Group, and other developing countries, asked for more time to allow national patent offices to review the questions before moving forward with the questionnaire.

    Work on quality of patents is much less ambitious than the options presented in the chair’s earlier draft. The SCP agreed to the “compilation, based on information received from Member States, of work-sharing programs among patent offices and use of external information for search and examination.”

    Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights

    Playing a key role in moving the SCP toward an agreement, the delegate from Brazil noted in his closing remarks, “It’s clear that no delegation is fully satisfied with the result so far. But, we have managed to come together on a common result, and that is important.”

    Brazil came to this session with a new proposal on how the committee could address exceptions and limitations to patent rights (SCP/19/6) involving analysis of exceptions and limitations most commonly used by countries and a seminar exploring these areas during the next SCP.

    While the seminar on exceptions and limitations was not in the chair’s first draft, a half-day session made it into the final work plan. On this issue, the WIPO secretariat will prepare a document on how member states have implemented five exceptions and limitations including private and/or non-commercial use; prior use; use of articles on foreign vessels, aircraft and land vehicles.

    On the remaining exceptions and limitations, including compulsory licensing and/or government use, the secretariat will prepare a document on how they are implemented. A follow-up half-day session will be held during the 21st SCP session.

    For the next SCP session, three dates have been proposed and most delegates were partial to holding the 20th SCP starting 9 December.

     

    Rachel Marusak Hermann may be reached at rachel@rachels-ink.com.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 50.16.108.167