• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Former Munich Mayor Warns Against Negative Effects Of City’s Re-Migration To Microsoft

12/06/2018 by Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The former mayor of Munich, Christian Ude (Social Democratic Party), clashed with the new head of IT of the Bavarian capital over the city’s re-migration from Linux to Microsoft at an event organised by the Green Party yesterday.

Speaking (in white shirt) is Thomas Boenig, to his right (in jacket) is Christian Ude.

During Ude’s term of office Munich’s city parliament in 2004 decided to migrate from Microsoft’s operating system and Office software to Linux, an open source software. Hailed by the free and open source community as a revolution, once Ude retired in 2014, his successor reverted the already completed migration, a decision which will cost the city’s taxpayers at least 89 million euros over 6 years.

Ude, speaking at the Green Party event, acknowledged the decision in 2003 was triggered by the fact that Microsoft stopped support for software licensed before the end of existing licence contracts, had been a political one in some part.

Today, Ude underlined, the need to migrate away from proprietary software of a big US company to open source software is only greater than before.

“How can you get more dependent on a US company if you know its dependence to current US politics and how they are used by US politics,” Ude said. “I think these questions have never been as disquieting and gloomy in post-War history than it has in these recent weeks.”

Munich’s new head of IT, Thomas Boenig, while acknowledging more software products from Germany or Europe would be highly welcome, argued that a change to an open source operating system alone was not making the administration more secure. Other parts of the infrastructure like browsers or email might as well offer points for attacks. He also said that the city needing a hybrid environment is prone to cause complexity and thereby insecurity, he said. Ude, for his part, said the migration to Linux had not been demanding for the public servants, and had been completed during his term.

Boenig rejected concerns from the Federal Office of Information Security and tests by data protection authorities showing that Windows 10 even for systems disconnected from online services still leaks data to the US company. Boenig’s main argument against the Linux in the city administration was lack of support from other cities and federal states.

“Munich cannot do this alone, it is not our job to develop software,” he said. The city had been “isolated,” Boenig added in defending the upcoming re-migration.

But there are a number of cities and state administrations considering to switch to free and open source software.

The city of Barcelona in January announced it is preparing for migration, joining the Free Software Foundation Europe’s initiative Public Money, Public Code.

The German city of Dortmund in April decided to evaluate a migration to free and open source software. And the Green Party in Munich promised should they become part of a coalition government in the upcoming local elections, they would with regard to the re-migration to Microsoft try to “make the best of a bad job.”

 

Image Credits: Monika Ermert

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Monika Ermert may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Former Munich Mayor Warns Against Negative Effects Of City’s Re-Migration To Microsoft" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, English, Europe, Human Rights, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Regional Policy, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Trackbacks

  1. SpicyIP Fortnightly Review (June 3-17) | SpicyIP says:
    17/06/2018 at 9:23 pm

    […] Former Munich Mayor Warns Against Negative Effects Of City’s Re-Migration To Microsoft […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.