Heading Off Global Action On Access To Medicines In 2018 19/01/2018 by Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and are not associated with Intellectual Property Watch. IP-Watch expressly disclaims and refuses any responsibility or liability for the content, style or form of any posts made to this forum, which remain solely the responsibility of their authors. Note: this article was originally published on Medium, here, and is reprinted with permission of the authors. By Dr. Jorge Bermudez and Dr. Viroj Tangcharoensathien At the dawn of 2018, political and health leaders must seize the growing momentum and opportunities to tackle the protracted challenges of access to medicines that undermines efforts to save lives and improve health as committed under the Agenda 2030 SDG [Sustainable Development Goals] by all UN member states. Over half of the world’s population does not have access to essential health services, 3.5 billion people are excluded from getting essential medicines; they are neither available nor affordable. The misaligned incentives are the root causes hampering access as well as research and development (R&D) of new molecules which address priority diseases. Soaring prices of EpiPens for severe allergies, cancer and Hepatitis C treatments dominated headlines in recent years and left millions behind unable to access the treatments and vaccines they need, even among high income countries. Death tolls of preventable or treatable diseases due to lack of access to vaccines or medicines licensed in the market is ethically and politically unacceptable. Or the cost of access results in unbearable financial hardships to patients and families and impoverishes them because of large medical bills [i]. High priced medical products is a major financial burden to health insurance funds. The scientific communities and vaccine industry had failed to develop an effective vaccine for diseases preferentially affect the poor; this was reflected by 11 thousand death tolls from Ebola epidemic in Western African countries. Despite Ebola was diagnosed since 1976; no vaccine was developed. Moreover, there have been just two new classes of antibiotics developed after 1962; though analogue development had kept pace with the emergence of resistant bacteria [ii]. The stagnation of R&D of new classes of antibiotic threatens both global human security and the human right to health; AMR will kill an estimate 10 million people every year by 2050. Not only people in low- and middle-income countries do not have access, the treatment cost of Hepatitis C, up to US$84,000–for a three-month course, is unaffordable even by American citizens or insurance funds[iii]. Companies’ pricing decisions serve their own financial interests at the expense of patients’ wellbeing [iv]. The monopoly status of patented products incentivized by the intellectual property regime is the root cause of limited access to medicines. Where there is no expectation of high profit margins or sales, such as Ebola, neglected tropical diseases or antibiotics despite public health significance, there is no R&D. In contrast where there is a lucrative market such as for treatments of hepatitis, cancer and other NCDs, the soaring price is the main barrier [v]. Implementing TRIPS flexibilities, a legal right by all WTO members to safeguard public health interests of their population, also faces challenges such as the use of compulsory licensing of Efavirenz for HIV by Thailand [[vi]], and imatinib for treatment of leukemia in Colombia. Implementing compulsory licensing, especially for countries considered Upper Middle Income economies, faces considerable retaliation and political pressures from government in certain high-income countries and industry. As a result, a study predicts a low probability of continued implementing compulsory licensing [vii]. Hence, further systematic assessment of global health governance on the current patent regime including TRIPS flexibilities, is required. With growing recognition of both the challenge and the need for reform, many governments around the world agree in key ways to tackle access and biomedical innovation challenges. This includes the importance of promotion of competition, transparency and new models of innovation. For example, Malaysia promotes competition to increase access to high priced hepatitis C treatments. In 2017, Malaysia was the first country to issue a TRIPS compliant compulsory license to allow both innovation and generic competition [viii]. Generic competition has reduced prices, a three-month course of treatment in Egypt dropped from US$ 900 in 2015 to less than US$ 200 in 2016, and in Pakistan the same course today costs as little as US$ 100 [ix]. There is also growing consensus on the need for increased transparency in medicines prices, research and development costs and clinical trials. Many WHO Member States agreed [x], [xi] to the need to pursue new models for innovation for urgently needed new antibiotics that ensure a return on the public investment by delinking the cost of research and development from prices and sales to improve access to medicines. To head off this ‘perfect storm’ of global health challenges, the World Health Organization’s Executive Board in January 22–27, 2018 as well as the World Health Assembly in May 2018 will consider for the first time the recommendations of the 2016 UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines [[xii]]. Based on recommendations of the Panel, the two platforms should find strategic solutions and concrete actions for improved access to medicines and leaving no one behind. Dr. Jorge Bermudez; Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Brazil and Member of UN Secretary General High Level Panel on Access to Medicines, email: email@example.com Dr. Viroj Tangcharoensathien; International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, email firstname.lastname@example.org References [i] WHO and World Bank. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2017 Global Monitoring Report. 2017. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/640121513095868125/pdf/122029-WP-REVISED-PUBLIC.pdf (accessed January 3, 2018 [ii] Coates AR, Halls G, Hu Y. Novel classes of antibiotics or more of the same? British Journal of Pharmacology. 2011;163(1):184–194. doi:10.1111/j.1476–5381.2011.01250.x. [iii] United States Senate Committee on Finance: Wyden-Grassley Sovaldi Investigation Finds Revenue-Driven Pricing Strategy Behind $84,000 Hepatitis Drug. 2017 https://www.finance.senate.gov/ranking-members-news/wyden-grassley-sovaldi-investigation-finds-revenue-driven-pricing-strategy-behind-84-000-hepatitis-drug (acceeded January 8,2019) [iv] Edlin B. Access to treatment for hepatitis C virus infection: time to put patients first. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; Published Online July 12, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30005-6 [v] Bermudez J. Contemporary challenges on access to medicines: beyond the UNSG High-Level Panel. Ciênc. saúde coletiva vol.22 no.8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017228.29362016 [vi] Wibulpolprasert S, Chokevivat V, Oh C, Yamabhai I. Government use licenses in Thailand: The power of evidence, civil movement and political leadership. Globalization and Health. 2011;7:32. doi:10.1186/1744–8603–7–32. [vii] Beall R, Kuhn R (2012) Trends in Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals Since the Doha Declaration: A Database Analysis. PLoS Med 9(1): e1001154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001154 [viii]. IP Watch: Malaysia Grants Compulsory License https://www.ip-watch.org/2017/09/15/malaysia-grants-compulsory-licence-generic-sofosbuvir-despite-gilead-licence/ (accessed January 8, 2018). [ix] WHO 2017. WHO prequalifies first generic active ingredient for hepatitis C medicines; available from http://www.who.int/medicines/news/2017/1st_generic-hepCprequalified_active_ingredient/en/ [access 8 January 2018] [x]. United Nations General Assembly 2016. Political Declaration of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on antimicrobial resistance; Resolution A/71/L.2; available from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/842813/files/A_71_L-2-EN.pdf [access 8 January 2018] [xi] Chan-O-Cha P, 2016. Statement on Behalf of the Group of 77 and China. High-Level Meeting on Antimicrobial Resistance. Available from http://www.g77.org/statement/getstatement.php?id=160921 [access 8 January 2018] [xii]. United Nations Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines. Report: Promoting innovation and access to health technologies. 2016. http://www.unsgaccessmeds.org (accessed January 8, 2018). Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Related "Heading Off Global Action On Access To Medicines In 2018" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.