• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Qatar WTO Complaint: Saudi, UAE, Bahrain Restrictions Violate IP Rights

04/08/2017 by Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The government of Qatar has requested World Trade Organization dispute settlement consultations with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia over restrictions ranging from goods and services, to maritime travel and airspace, to intellectual property rights. In the filing, Qatar complains the countries are engaging in “coercive attempts at economic isolation,” including blocking copyrighted works. 

The related WTO documents are: WT/DS526/1 (UAE), WT/DS527/1 (Bahrain), and WT/DS528/1 (Saudi Arabia).

The three documents make similar or identical arguments.

Document WT/DS526/1 • G/L/1180 • S/L/415 • IP/D/35 (UAE) dated 4 August states:

“7. In respect of trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights, the coercive attempts at economic isolation entail interference with intellectual property rights enjoyed by nationals of Qatar. Specifically, these measures include prohibitions or restrictions on displaying and accessing television content over which Qatari nationals hold copyrights and related broadcasting rights.”

[For Saudi Arabia, the complaint adds: “These also include measures that prohibit or restrict making of payments to (or receiving of payments by) Qatari television broadcasters.”]

The complaints details the concerns as such:

“15. Third, it appears that certain measures contravene provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. Specifically, certain measures appear to violate:

(i) Article 3 [National Treatment] of the TRIPS Agreement, because, by:

– making it impossible for holders of licenses to copyrights, trademarks and other forms of intellectual property owned by Qatari nationals to honour their obligations under licensing agreements; and,
– making it impossible for Qatari owners of copyrights, trademarks and other forms of intellectual property, and their licensees, to use those intellectual property rights in the territory of the UAE, the UAE appears to have failed to accord to the nationals of Qatar treatment no less favourable than that it accords to its own nationals with regard to the protection of intellectual property.

(j) Article 4 [Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment] of the TRIPS Agreement, because, by:

– making it impossible for holders of licenses to copyrights, trademarks and other forms of intellectual property owned by Qatari nationals to honour their obligations under licensing agreements; and,
– making it impossible for Qatari owners of copyrights, trademarks and other forms of intellectual property, and their licensees, to use those intellectual property rights in the territory of the UAE, the UAE appears to have failed to accord, immediately and unconditionally, to the nationals of Qatar, advantages, favours, privileges and immunities granted by it to the nationals of other countries with regard to the protection of intellectual property.”

Under WTO rules, if the parties fail to resolve the issue after 60 days, the complaining country can request the formation of dispute panel. The WTO press release on this complaint is here.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Qatar WTO Complaint: Saudi, UAE, Bahrain Restrictions Violate IP Rights" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, Enforcement, English, IP Law, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WTO/TRIPS

Trackbacks

  1. Qatar WTO Complaint: Saudi, UAE, Bahrain Restrictions Violate IP Rights – WebLegal says:
    07/08/2017 at 10:07 am

    […] complains the countries are engaging in “coercive attempts at economic isolation.” Fonte:https://www.ip-watch.org/2017/08/04/wto-qatar-says-saudis-uae-bahrain-violating-ip-rights/ Author: William […]

    Reply
  2. Qatar WTO Dispute Case: IP Issue Or National Security? - Intellectual Property Watch says:
    25/10/2017 at 3:36 pm

    […] and Bahrain in August, detailing intellectual property rights violations among other concerns (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 4 August 2017). A panel can be requested 60 days after the consultation request, and can be blocked one […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.