• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WTO IP Division Director’s Thoughts On World IP Day

26/04/2017 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Antony Taubman, director of the World Trade Organization Intellectual Property Division, has been in a good position to view the world and intellectual property for some time. Today, designated as World IP Day, we caught up with him to ask his views on the theme this year.

Tony Taubman at Fordham

TAUBMAN: For those of us working on the dimensions of IP law and policy that are of concern to the wider community, the need has become paramount to translate between increasingly complex, technical subject matter and major, overarching public policy issues. A major difficulty we encounter in reaching out beyond a familiar circle of experts to the public at large is, in essence, how to translate between two distinct forms of discourse, two modes of speaking about the IP system – what it’s there for, what it does.

It’s always been a challenge to make IP law and policy intelligible to the wider community – it is an irreducibly complex field, subject to technicalities and legal nuances, and characterized by diversity in national systems. In an earlier time, it might have been left to experts to ponder in relative obscurity. Yet, today, it’s an area of absorbing interest and abiding concern for many – consider the debates over health, green innovation policy, the digital divide, indigenous culture and knowledge systems, and diffusion of cultural works.

Initiatives like World IP Day help bring IP to the attention of the public, valuably reinforcing the sense that we all have a stake in the IP system. But we also have to acknowledge that the wider public naturally won’t have the time, the bandwidth, the sheer endurance to master the technicalities of IP law. The challenge for all of us working in the field is therefore to come up with a credible, coherent, inclusive way of translating between the lofty policy aspirations of the IP system and the geeky technical details.

What I find, though, in working through the topical issues is that, at core, there are some fundamental principles that we all share: ideas of equity and balance, ideas of due acknowledgement and respect for real creativity and innovation, that lie beneath the sometimes quite sharp political divides and some of the seemingly incomprehensible technical debate. These are principles that we can actually reinforce and build upon.

That for me is a large part of what’s going on in the innumerable meetings on IP matters that take place here in Geneva. It’s not always evident, and if you simply read the reports of some of the meetings, you would imagine there are unbridgeable divides: but I don’t think that state of affairs is an inevitability. After many years of debate, there’s still a vast amount of listening, learning, and thoughtful communication needed to carry us forward. Indeed, that’s why I characterize the challenge as almost one of literally translating between two languages: recognizing that technical jargon and specialised discourse is unavoidable when working at an expert level, but recognizing that this is not the right register or pitch to use when talking about fundamental issues – environment, health, inclusiveness in the knowledge economy, core notions of recognition and equitable balance  – it’s not going to bridge the gaps in understanding that can dominate discussion.

So World IP Day helps us focus on what is to me the defining challenge of IP policy today: how to communicate to the wider community credible, factually well-founded, and accessible ideas about the principles of IP, and how to sustain inclusive, respectful and informed debate about the practical application of these principles in the real world.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WTO IP Division Director’s Thoughts On World IP Day" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, English, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WTO/TRIPS

Trackbacks

  1. WTO IP Division Director’s Thoughts On World IP Day – WebLegal says:
    17/05/2017 at 10:15 am

    […] Today, designated as World IP Day, we caught up with him to ask his views on the theme this year. Fonte:https://www.ip-watch.org/2017/04/26/wto-ip-division-directors-thoughts-world-ip-day/ Author: William […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.