• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

EU Court Of Justice: EU Is Competent To Ratify Marrakesh Treaty

14/02/2017 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch 3 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The European Union ratification of a treaty allowing an exception to copyright for the benefit of visually impaired people might be yet one step closer as the Court of Justice of the EU found today that the EU has exclusive competence to conclude it.

The story of the ratification of the 2013 Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled has seen a number of twists, as some countries have argued that the EU did not have full competence to ratify the treaty.

The Court of Justice of the European Union concluded that the EU has exclusive competence to conclude the Marrakesh Treaty, without the participation of EU members, since the treaty may affect the directive on copyright or alter its scope.

The Court was required to examine whether the treaty is connected with the EU common commercial policy, and found it is not, according to a Court press release [pdf].

The reasoning of the Court is that “First, the treaty is not intended to promote, facilitate or govern international trade in accessible format copies,” but rather aims at improving “the position of beneficiary persons by facilitating, through various means, their access to published works.”

“Secondly, the cross-border exchange of accessible format copies for which the Marrakesh Treaty provides cannot be equated with international trade engaged in by ordinary operators for commercial purposes (given that the exchange in question takes place only between government institutions or non-profit organisations in accordance with the conditions specified in the treaty and that the copies imported and exported are intended for beneficiary persons alone),” the opinion said.

The Court found that the treaty lays down an obligation and not merely an option, to “introduce an exception or limitation for the benefit of certain persons with disabilities.” The Court considered that “once the treaty is concluded, all the Member States will be required to introduce the exception or limitation for persons with a disability.”

Since the conclusion of the Marrakesh Treaty may affect the directive on copyright or alter its scope, the Court found, it concluded “that the EU has exclusive competence and that the treaty may be concluded by the EU acting on its own, without the participation of the Member States.”

Already in September, the advocate general of the Court of Justice of the EU found that the EU has exclusive competence to ratify the Marrakesh Treaty (IPW, Access to Knowledge/Education, 14 September 2016).

World Blind Union Welcomes Ruling, Calls for Swift Action

[Update] According to a World Blind Union press release, the European Parliament is currently working on a legislative package to implement the treaty into EU law.

Ratification of the treaty is legally independent from this legislation, the release said, “but EU member states had requested the Directive and Regulation that will be voted in the European Parliament´s Legal Affairs Committee on March 22nd.”

Informal discussions between the Parliament and EU member states will begin after that vote, according to the release, which further stated that “some of the issues that will be dealt with are compensation schemes, commercial availability and the official registration of authorized entities.”

“The ECJ opinion re-confirms that a group of EU member states in the Council have made us needlessly lose over three years in being able to help the right to read of millions of visually-disabled persons inside and outside the EU,” it said.

“We welcome the ECJ’s ruling, which should be followed by swift action to make sure that the EU and its member states ratify and implement the benefits of the treaty with no further delay. This treaty, and today’s ruling, can help millions of blind and visually impaired all over the world to have better access to books in an accessible format.”

The World Blind Union blames Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom for blocking the ratification of the treaty by the EU.

 

Image Credits: Flickr – Irish Typepad

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"EU Court Of Justice: EU Is Competent To Ratify Marrakesh Treaty" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, English, Europe, IP Law, Regional Policy

Comments

  1. john e miller says

    23/02/2017 at 1:02 am

    From the above: ‘The Court found that the treaty lays down an obligation and not merely an option, to “introduce an exception or limitation for the benefit of certain persons with disabilities.” The Court considered that “once the treaty is concluded, all the Member States will be required to introduce the exception or limitation for persons with a disability.”‘

    The Court might have ruled, once the EU ratifies the Marrakesh Treaty, that would override and supersede any individual Member State’s copyright law modified-or-not as to whether accessible format copies could be exported to other EU Member States or other non-EU parties, etc., to the Marrakesh Treaty. It did not do so.

    MEP Notis Marias said at an EU Petitions Committee meeting 17SEP2015 that the whole competence issues was just a ‘smokescreen’ to underlying economic issues or concerns with the Treaty. So that may now come to the forefront regarding Member States required ‘obligation’ to modify their copyright laws to conform to the Marrakesh Treaty when ratified and just how swiftly they intend to do so.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Access Treaty for Visually Impaired Readers (Finally) Steps Forward On EU Ratification - Intellectual Property Watch says:
    11/05/2017 at 3:45 pm

    […] A competency debate kept the EU from ratifying the treaty sooner (IPW, Europe, 14 February 2017). […]

    Reply
  2. EUがマラケシュ条約に批准にむけた法整備をほぼ終える | すちゃらかコーダー says:
    11/07/2017 at 5:28 pm

    […]  欧州議会は以下の規則(REGULATION)と指令(DIRECTIVE)を2017年7月6日に採択して、EUとしては、必要な法整備はほぼ終えたらしい。あとは、指令(DIRECTIVE)に基づいて加盟国が国内法の法整備をしていくことになる (期限はEU官報掲載後から12ヶ月以内)。  マラケシュ条約については、批准の主体が各加盟国ではなく、EUであるということが、欧州裁判所の判決ででている(参考 :IP Watch記事)ので、EUが批准すればEU加盟国はすべてマラケシュ条約の加盟国になる。EUの批准の時期は、加盟国の国内法の整備後でしょうか(そうなると1年後)。    EUのマラケシュ条約批准に向けた動きそのものは各方面で歓迎されていますが、権利者への補償金を支払うスキームにしてしまったようで、それについては、当事者団体やIFLAなどから懸念が示されているというか、反発されているらしい(例えば、欧州盲人連合の声明[PDF]など)。 […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.