• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

ARIPO Reviews Draft Regulations On Implementation Of Arusha Protocol On Plant Varieties

24/06/2016 by Hillary Muheebwa for Intellectual Property Watch 3 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) last week hosted a meeting of experts in Harare, Zimbabwe, to review the Draft Regulations for the Implementation of the Arusha Protocol for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants.

Biodiversity - Plant While opening the meeting, Zimbabwe’s Ringson Chitsiko applauded ARIPO for having developed the Arusha Protocol and acknowledged the extensive work that was put into it by experts from the member states.

Chitsiko is the permanent secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanization and Irrigation Development of the Republic of Zimbabwe.

Chitsiko urged the delegates to “appreciate that the development of new varieties of plants is important to African food security as it is meant to improve agricultural productivity as well as provide farmers with high yielding pest and disease free seeds.”

The Arusha Protocol for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants was adopted by ARIPO member states in July 2015. The Protocol is modelled on the 1991 Act of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV 1991).

After adopting the Protocol, the ARIPO secretariat was tasked with formulating draft regulations, which will guide the implementation and operations of the protocol.

The review meeting was attended by experts from ministries of agriculture in the member states, representatives from national intellectual property offices, plant breeders and civil society organisations.

Among the civil society organisations that attended were representatives from the African Centre for Biodiversity, African Seed Trade Association, and Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa.

Other plant breeders’ rights organisations that participated in the meeting were the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of the European Union, Groupement National Interprofessionnel des Semences et Plants (GNIS), and Geneva-based International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV).

According to ARIPO, “while deliberations were mainly centered on the key provisions of the Arusha Protocol vis-à-vis provisions of other existing global plant variety protection systems and the benefits of plant varieties protection, the meeting was to also to comprehensively review the draft regulations to make them amenable to the situation and demands of the African farmer.”

Among the issues to be defined in the regulations are the restrictions on exercise of breeder’s right, fees for application and implementation of the protocol, remuneration to be paid by farmers, and the information to be provided by the farmer to the breeder.

Francesco Mattina, head of legal unit at the CPVO, presented to the meeting the community plant variety protection system of the European Union.

Yolanda Huerta, UPOV legal counsel, presented a summary of the UPOV system and how it has been benefiting its members.

Experts in a panel discussion session (Courtesy of ARIPO)

Experts in a panel discussion session (Courtesy of ARIPO)

During the meeting, the work done by the delegates included deletions, additions, corrections, clarifications, redrafting and simplifications made to the text of the draft regulations in order to accommodate as much as possible the aspirations of the various stakeholders represented by the experts taking part in the meeting.

“The Arusha Protocol relates to food security, which is an issue of great concern for African and developing countries. The protection that would be given to plant breeders will incentivise them to propagate new plant varieties, which will ultimately enhance food security,” reads part of a statement released by ARIPO.

According to the Protocol, it recognises “the need to have an effective sui generis system of intellectual property protection of new varieties of plants that meets the requirements of Article 27.3 (b) of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement.”

Article 27.3 (b) of the TRIPS Agreement states that, “members may also exclude from patentability: plants and animals other than micro-organisms, and essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals other than non-biological and microbiological processes.  However, Members shall provide for the protection of plant varieties either by patents or by an effective sui generis system or by any combination thereof.”

Pre-eminence of Plant Breeders, Concerns for Farmers

Civil society organisations have campaigned against plant breeders’ regulation, arguing that the proposed protection framework is unsuitable for African countries as it may affect traditional rights for farmers to save, exchange or sell farm-saved seeds.

Bridget Mugambe, policy advocate for Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa, said in a statement to Intellectual Property Watch: “One major concern about the ARIPO regulations is that they attempt to give more powers to the ARIPO office and undermine national sovereignty. The regulations for example oblige national authorities to accept the decision of the ARIPO office once it decides to grant plant breeders rights. This is in spite of the fact that the protocol gives national authorities the right to object to any plant breeders’ rights as granted by ARIPO.”

“The regulations also further risk infringing on farmers’ rights by putting in place provisions requiring farmers, seed processors and certifications agencies to provide information and monitor the use of farm saved seed by farmers. All these are ways of intimidating farmers and infringing on their rights,” Mugambe added. “It is my hope the revised regulations take into account all the concerns that were raised by civil society actors such as those pertaining to national sovereignty and respect of farmers’ rights.”

Sub-Committee Looks Ahead

At the end of the review meeting, a special sub-committee was established to do the final review of the regulations as agreed by the experts. The sub-committee is made up of experts from Liberia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zimbabwe, and is chaired by Zambia.

According to Fernando dos Santos, director general of ARIPO, “the document is being cleaned to take into account the discussions of last week. After that the document will be reviewed by the Technical Committee on Plant Variety and later discussed and adopted by the Administrative Council in December 2016.”

ARIPO was created by the Lusaka Agreement of 1976, and currently has 19 African member states.

 

Image Credits: Flickr Tim Hamilton, ARIPO

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Hillary Muheebwa may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"ARIPO Reviews Draft Regulations On Implementation Of Arusha Protocol On Plant Varieties" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Africa, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, English, Environment, Human Rights, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Regional Policy, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, UPOV / CBD, WIPO

Trackbacks

  1. #ARIPO Reviews Draft Regulations On Implementation Of Arusha Protoc… | Dr. Roy Schestowitz (罗伊) says:
    24/06/2016 at 9:28 pm

    […] Reviews Draft Regulations On Implementation Of Arusha Protocol On Plant Varieties http://www.ip-watch.org/2016/06/24/aripo-reviews-draft-regulations-on-implementation-of-arusha-proto… #industry vs. […]

    Reply
  2. Links 26/6/2016: IceCat 38.8.0, Wine 1.9.13 | Techrights says:
    26/06/2016 at 9:03 pm

    […] ARIPO Reviews Draft Regulations On Implementation Of Arusha Protocol On Plant Varieties […]

    Reply
  3. Of bigger pictures and tightrope walking… – Othentik Natural Resources Management says:
    11/07/2017 at 7:59 pm

    […] imagine what tightrope CSO’s are walking to fight for a place at the table in the drafting of Plant Variety Protection laws. There are issues to be addressed at farmer level. The 1st being that Farmer Seed Systems are not […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.