• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Conference Looks At Public Interest In South Africa’s Draft Copyright Bill

13/08/2015 by Linda Daniels for Intellectual Property Watch 4 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA – A conference here this week elicited a robust debate amongst intellectual property stakeholders in South Africa about the objectives of the far-reaching draft Copyright Amendment Bill. 

The Internet Rights, Cultural Development and Balancing Features in South African Copyright Reform conference was held on 11 August in Pretoria.

The Conference on Internet Rights, Cultural Development and Balancing Features in South African Copyright Reform

The Conference on Internet Rights, Cultural Development and Balancing Features in South African Copyright Reform. Photo credit: Theresa Hume

The one day conference brought together activists, law practitioners, academics and government representatives to unpack the draft amendment bill which was published in the government gazette three weeks ago (IPW, Africa, 28 July 2015). The publishing of the bill opened a 30-day window period for public comments. [Update: the deadline for comments has been extended to 16 September 2015, according to sources.]

Tobias Schonwetter, director of the Intellectual Property Unit at the University of Cape Town and regional coordinator for Creative Commons, opened the conference by emphasising that the meeting was focused on the public interest of the bill.

“The subject matter of copyright law is knowledge. It is cultural material. Any IP is not an end. The purpose is much more utilitarian,” he said. “How can we retain balance of rights holders and users especially in the digital age?”

Schonwetter added of the bill: “the general direction is right.”

Macdonald Netshitenzhe, chief director of policy and legislation at the Department of Trade and Industry, in his opening address sketched, amongst other things, the trajectory of the bill.

He said that local musicians reached out to government with complaints around royalties that were not forthcoming and it was this concern that was the catalyst for the drafting of a revised copyright law in South Africa. Netshitenzhe said that the copyright law that existed in South Africa prior to the drafting of the bill was “archaic”.

The conference also saw in attendance government representatives from the Department of Arts and Culture.

Lucy Mahlangu, director for multilaterals and resourcing in the Department of Arts and Culture, underscored government’s position on copyright.

“Copyright after creation is the root to wealth, so it’s very important to us that what we are not, nationally and internationally, out of kilter,” she said. “We come from a history of a certain group that was more equal [that needs to be addressed]. Let’s look at whose rights are being protected. Let’s look at the six or seven big IP firms, whose rights are they protecting? We also need to remember that there is a groundswell of people who have been not been protected in terms of IP.”

Google Copyright Counsel Fred von Lohmann reminded conference delegates of the staggering and continuous creation of content on the internet which copyright legislation is rushing to try and catch up with.

“I hope to persuade you to keep in mind the new creators and technology platforms alongside the traditional stakeholders,” he said. “Well over 99 percent of creative works are created by individuals for non-commercial purposes. All this is not in the realm of traditional copyright concerns. At best for them copyright is a poor fit. The creators are themselves are trying to solve the problem themselves [with approaches] such as Creative Commons … that are trying to change the defaults. The truth today is, copyright law does not distinguish non-commercial users from others.”

Conference delegates picked apart sections of the bill that they felt were presently unworkable and workshopped suggestions to government representatives in attendance.

Many of those present told Intellectual Property Watch that they would also submit more considered written submissions to government during the current window for public comments.

Schonwetter raised the issue of fair dealings and fair use in the draft bill. He felt that the draft piece of legislation was trying to combine the two.

“I think there should be an improvement in the way section 12a is being done,” he said. “There seems to be a confusion between fair use and fair dealing. Fair dealing is limited to certain purposes. But fair use has no such limitations. Section 12a is a mishmash of the two. This is something we will put into our submissions.”

Discussions at the conference

Discussions at the conference. Photo credit: Theresa Hume

Marc Shwinges, CEO of TransMedia Africa and chair of the South African Screen Federation, spoke of the frustrations facing South African filmmakers who are commissioned to create content for broadcasters, and suggested a change in Section 21 of the draft bill.

“When work is commissioned, there are certain types of creative work where the commissioner owns the copyright of that work,” said Shwinges. “Section 21 includes portrait photographs, a recording and the making of cinematographic work which includes a documentary. In South Africa, we have to look at the finance model. In an increasingly multi-platform model, we will see a proliferation of more free to air community broadcasts. We can’t ignore that work will be exploited on multiple levels, so we have the default model of a broadcaster commissioning and then owns the content.”

Showings continued: “The broadcaster owns it and doesn’t want to licence it to competitors. One wants to have work reach maximum audience. We need to address Section 21 …the position of power is wrong.”

Anriette Esterhuizen, executive director of the Association for Progressive Communication, a network of organisations working with information and communication technologies to support social justice and development, said of the draft bill: “The notion of balancing rights is problematic. I would advocate public interest; how do you balance the rights of librarians on the one hand and huge multinationals on the other. They don’t have equal voice and that is challenging.”

She added that “pushing back on copyright is often necessary and that can be good.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Linda Daniels may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Conference Looks At Public Interest In South Africa’s Draft Copyright Bill" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Africa, Copyright Policy, English, Finance, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Innovation/ R&D, Lobbying, Regional Policy

Trackbacks

  1. Conference Looks At Public Interest In South Africa’s Draft Copyright Bill | UCT IP Unit says:
    13/08/2015 at 4:39 pm

    […] Linda Daniels for IP Watch, published under a CC BY NC SA […]

    Reply
  2. Conference Looks At Public Interest In South Africa’s Draft Copyright Bill » infojustice says:
    14/08/2015 at 5:32 pm

    […] Daniels, IP Watch, Link (CC-BY-NC-SA)] A conference here this week elicited a robust debate amongst intellectual property […]

    Reply
  3. South African Copyright Review is Overdue, Pioneering, and in Parts Completely Absurd | thewire says:
    14/08/2015 at 6:54 pm

    […] public consultation on the South African Copyright Act amendments, which has already attracted intense interest from local stakeholders, remains open until August 27. If you are South African, now is the time to speak up in support of […]

    Reply
  4. South African Copyright Review is Overdue, Pioneering, and in Parts Completely Absurd | Michigan Standard says:
    15/08/2015 at 11:00 am

    […] public consultation on the South African Copyright Act amendments, which has already attracted intense interest from local stakeholders, remains open until August 27. If you are South African, now is the time to speak up in support of […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.