• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WTO: Talks On GI Register Start, Tied To Other Negotiations In July 2015 Deadline

12/12/2014 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

An informal meeting of World Trade Organization members on a long-discussed register on geographical indications of wines and spirits today showed that members are committed but not yet inclined to delve into the issues until they have a clearer picture of other sensitive topics of the Doha Round.

On 12 December an “open-ended” informal Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Special Session was convened to discuss the register again, after discussions in April showed that member states were not ready to move forward, according to the WTO.

The TRIPS “special sessions” relate to the negotiations on a multilateral register for geographical indications of wines and spirits. In TRIPS, wines and spirits enjoy a higher level of protection than other geographical indications.

Discussions on the register have been going on for a number of years, with no agreement.

The discussions have been revived after a new deadline of July 2015 was set to lay down plans on how to complete de Doha Round talks, to which the register is part of. The new deadline was spurred by a breakthrough in the General Council on 27 November.

According to a WTO official, today’s meeting chair, Ambassador Dacio Castillo of Honduras, told participant that time is short. But member countries did not seem ready to start the “hard talking” until they have a clearer picture of other key subjects of the negotiating round, the source said. Those subjects include agriculture, non-agricultural market access, and services.

“1 July 2015 is only 200 days away — we will have to think concretely about how to structure our work next year and how to get back to the substance of our mandate,” Dacio Castillo was quoted as saying.

Following a proposal by Castillo, an informal information meeting is expected to be convened in February 2015, with a summary of what had happened up to 2011, when special sessions ceased to be convened regularly, according to the WTO official.

He added that the February meeting could also include “information on developments outside the WTO that might have a bearing on the talks, such as bilateral or regional trade agreements, and the proposed revision of the [World Intellectual Property Organization Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration].”

During today’s meeting, according to the official, one group repeated its position that talks on the register should be part of a package that includes a proposal to extend the higher protection to other geographical indications, and a proposal to require in particular that patent applications disclose the origin of genetic resources and any associated traditional knowledge.  This group, including Brazil, China, the European Union, and Switzerland, sponsored a document in July 2008 on the subject.

A number of other WTO member states who had sponsored a joint proposal in March 2011, restated their view that the special session negotiations should focus only on the geographical indications register. This group includes Argentina, Australia, the United States, Japan, and New Zealand.

 

Image Credits: FLickr – Uncalno Tekno

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WTO: Talks On GI Register Start, Tied To Other Negotiations In July 2015 Deadline" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, Enforcement, English, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, WIPO, WTO/TRIPS

Trackbacks

  1. Status Of Potential WTO Wines And Spirits Register Discussed says:
    24/02/2015 at 1:01 pm

    […] 23 February informal meeting follows a meeting in December, which was inconclusive (IPW, WTO, 12 December 2014). According to the WTO spokesperson, WTO members received “a refresher course” on the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.