• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

World Drug Regulatory Authorities Meet In Brazil; Biosimilars In Focus

26/08/2014 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Drug regulatory authorities are meeting this week in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to discuss global regulatory issues such as vaccine regulation, falsified products, and pharmacovigilance. A “pre-conference” focused on biosimilars, with civil society warning on barriers to access to those products.

The 16th International Conference of Drug and Regulatory Authorities (ICDRA) is taking place from 26-29 August in Rio.

The aim of the conference is to provide drug regulatory authorities of the World Health Organization member states with a forum to share information and strengthen collaboration, according to the WHO.

A pre-conference titled, “Ensuring Quality and Safety of Biosimilars for Patients Worldwide” was held on 24-25 August, open to drug regulators, pharmaceutical industry, academia, non-governmental and international organisations, according to the ICDRA website. The conference itself, however, is restricted to government officials and regulators.

The ICDRA programme includes plenary sessions and workshops, such as: Best Practices in Pharmacovigilance; How to ensure the safety of traditional and complementary medicines in national healthcare systems; Challenges of vaccines regulation and safety monitoring; Preventing and reducing the risk to public health from SSFFC (substandard/spurious/falsely-labelled/falsified/counterfeit) medical products; Biosimilars; and Strengthening regulatory systems for medical products.

According to a definition provided by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA), biotherapeutics “are very complex molecules made in living organisms by genetically engineering DNA.”

“Regulatory authorities are continually faced with new issues,” according to the WHO, including globalisation, the extension of free trade, improvement and sophistication of products which increase the demand on regulatory systems, and extensive use of the internet.

For the IFPMA, “biotherapeutics are the new generation of medical treatment that is making a genuine difference in people’s lives who are suffering from cancer, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, hepatitis C, and chronic renal failure.”

“Access to biotherapeutic products, including biosimilars, and ensuring their quality, safety and efficacy will be important challenges in the future,” IFPMA stated, underlining the importance of pharmacovigilance systems.

Civil Society: Keep Prices Within Reach

A long list of civil society groups issued a statement on the pre-conference and the conference itself. In their statement, circulated on the Knowledge Ecology International ip-health listserv, the groups recognise the potential of biotherapeutic products to address healthcare needs but warned about high prices of such products. The groups said those high prices prevent millions of people from getting access to those products and are preventing governments from including biotherapeutic products in public health programmes in a sustainable manner.

“The promotion of biotherapeutic products should not be driven by market interests,” they said. Two factors act as barriers to biotherapeutic products, the group said, one of which is intellectual property rights and a stringent regulatory framework. The group also suggests that the WHO guidelines are based on the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) standards for the regulation of biotherapeutic products, which according to them is “an exclusive club of originator companies and drug regulatory authorities of US [United States], EU [European Union] and Japan.”

The group called upon governments and regulatory authorities “to establish regulatory frameworks that facilitate access to affordable, safe and efficacious biotherapeutic products.” “Regulation cannot pose a new barrier to competition and access…” they said, mentioning the World Health Assembly resolution (67.21) on access to biotherapeutic products adopted in May 2014 .

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"World Drug Regulatory Authorities Meet In Brazil; Biosimilars In Focus" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, English, Health & IP, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, WHO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.