Latest Draft Of European Patent Court Agreement Released 28/09/2012 by Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)A new draft of the agreement on creation of a European Unified Patent Court has been issued by the Council of the European Union. The latest version shows the changes agreed earlier this year, including to locate the central office in Paris with divisions in London and Munich. The new version is available here. The release was first reported by the London-based IP Kat blog. The new version highlights major changes to the text, as such: 1. The definition of “European patent” in Art. 2 point (5) has been adapted to make it clear that the Court shall have the same jurisdiction with regard to European patents as national courts currently have. In this context, Art. 15b has been moved up as Art. -15 in order to clarify that the jurisdiction of the Court does not lag behind the jurisdiction of national courts in the area of patents as far as the exclusive competence of the Court in that area is concerned. 2. Article 5(3) has been amended in order to clarify that it will be possible to set up an additional local division for every one hundred patent cases. 3. Article 6(3) was amended in order to clarify what happens in situations where the exact number of 50 cases occurred. 4. In Article 6(4), the term “permanent” in the expression “permanent legally qualified judge” was deleted in order to align the wording with the preceding paragraphs. In the same paragraph, the reference to “regional list” was deleted, given that no such list is provided for in Art. 15. 5. The institutional provisions relating to the Administrative Committee, the Budget Committee and the Advisory Committee have been moved into Chapter I. For the Budget Committee, a new paragraph (3a) has been added to allow for the Budget Committee to adopt its rules of procedure. 6. In order to avoid possible misunderstandings, Union law was moved up in the list of sources of law for the UPC in Art 14e. 7. The terminology of Articles 14f to 14h has been aligned with that of Articles 6-8 of the draft UPP Regulation, the acquis and international Treaties. 8. In Article 21, the reference to the Statute was erroneous given that the latter does not contain any provisions on the costs relating to the functioning of the Centre. The current version proposes therefore that such costs be covered by the budget of the Court, in line with the costs for the training framework for judges (see Art. 20). 9. The previous Article 27 was split into two Articles (i.e. 26a and 27) in order to distinguish more clearly the question of legal capacity from the question of who may have legal standing before the Court. 10. In Article 28, an effort was made to clarify the status and the role of patent attorneys in the proceedings before the Court. Account has been taken of the fact that the concept of “patent attorney” might not be known in all Contracting States. 11. The provisions of Chapter IV (Powers of the Court) have been aligned more closely to the corresponding provisions of the Enforcement Directive 12. The Final provisions have been streamlined. Article 58f (Languages of the Agreement) has been aligned on the corresponding provision of the EPC. Finally, Article 59 provides now for a single entry into force of the Agreement, which shall depend inter alia upon the prior entry into force of any amendments of Regulation (EC) 44/2001 are deemed necessary to accommodate the setting up of the UPC. 13. Finally, in Article 6 of the Statute (Immunity of judges) the wording has been aligned to that concerning judges of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The agreement should give a means for European patent proprietors to seek unitary patent protection in all of the participating nations of the agreement. The agreement is scheduled to take effect on 1 January 2014 or “on the first day of the fourth month of the 13th deposit” with some additional conditions. The unified patent court took years to reach agreement, which finally occurred this year (IPW, European Policy, 29 June 2012). Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Related "Latest Draft Of European Patent Court Agreement Released" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.