• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Indonesia, Cuba Do Not Appeal WTO Plain-Packaging Ruling

27/08/2018 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 4 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The governments of Cuba and Indonesia today chose not to appeal a June ruling at the World Trade Organization that upheld Australia’s law requiring tobacco products sold in the country to be packaged without logos or other trademarked designs. That leaves Honduras and the Dominican Republic alone in their appeals of the decision.

At the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) meeting today,neither Cuba nor Indonesia appealed the panel ruling, letting it stand in relation to their cases as the DSB adopted the report.

Cuba had accusatory words for Australia and the dispute settlement panel in the case, and said that because of these, it would not pursue the appeal, according to a copy of its statement. It did not admit wrong or agree to make changes to its practices.

Cuba said tobacco accounts for some 9 percent of its exports and that the adoption of “generic” packaging measures affects its legitimate economic interests and is not proportional. It argued that there is still no evidence or proof that the plain packaging measures are working to stop tobacco use or improve health in the country.

The Cuban government accused Australia of causing “down-trading” by tobacco users as there is no distinction between tobacco products any longer, rather than actually reducing smoking. It repeated assertions about specific WTO agreements, including a reference to protection of geographical indications.

Cuba called the panel’s report “very deceiving,” said it relied on fundamentally non-objective analysis, and that it was structured to reach a predetermined outcome. “In other words,” it said, the report was subjected to “reverse engineering.” Notwithstanding its serious concerns about the report, the country chose not to participate in the next phase. Indonesia reportedly also indicated its displeasure with the ruling but chose not to appeal.

Australia, for its part, praised the panel for confirming that WTO rules do not inhibit the right of members to “implement legitimate, non-discriminatory public health measures.” It also noted the number of other countries which have since adopted their own plain packaging laws, including the United Kingdom, France, Ireland, New Zealand, Hungary and Slovenia. It named others that are currently working to adopt such measures, including Canada, Uruguay, Singapore, Belgium and Chile.

Canada, a third party to the case, applauded the panel’s decision, saying it reflects a “careful balance struck between rights and obligations to facilitate trade and a Member’s right to take legitimate public health measures.” Canada confirmed it is currently working to adopt plain packaging measures.

Honduras, Dominican Republic, Cuba and Indonesia had each brought a case against Australia after it implemented its tobacco plain-packaging law in 2012. Their cases were eventually joined together and the decision came in June. Honduras appealed in July, and the Dominican Republic appealed on the eve of today’s meeting.

 

Image Credits: -Oncology News Australia

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Indonesia, Cuba Do Not Appeal WTO Plain-Packaging Ruling" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: Language, Themes, Venues, English, Health & IP, IP Law, WTO/TRIPS

Comments

  1. Mandrake says

    30/08/2018 at 2:22 am

    No more Cuban cigars for you, 3 years, lol

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Links 29/8/2018: Solaris 11.4, More Intel Issues | Techrights says:
    29/08/2018 at 1:32 pm

    […] Indonesia, Cuba Do Not Appeal WTO Plain-Packaging Ruling […]

    Reply
  2. The Tobacco Plain Packaging Wars Continue Following Appeal of WTO Ruling - Regulating for Globalization says:
    12/09/2018 at 1:57 am

    […] then there were two Although Cuba and Indonesia chose not to appeal the WTO plain packaging ruling, Honduras and the Dominican Republic did. WTO appeals must […]

    Reply
  3. An Update on the Tobacco Plain Packaging Case at the WTO | SpicyIP says:
    02/07/2019 at 6:55 pm

    […] all four countries have unanimously decried the decision of the Panel, only Honduras and the Dominican Republic have decided to pursue an appeal before the Appellate Body.  In their public statements, however, Indonesia and Cuba have […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.