• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WIPO Assembly: IP-Watch Tally Of Finished And Pending Items

10/10/2016 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

As the 2016 World Intellectual Property Organization General Assemblies near their close on 11 October, Intellectual Property Watch provides an update on what’s been agreed and what’s still outstanding among the key issues.

WIPO - Catherine Saez (13)Delegates have made decisions on a number of topics, but the touchiest are still open. For instance, the General Assembly needs to decide whether or not to organise a high-level meeting to conclude a new treaty on industrial designs, and which countries will be hosting the next WIPO external offices. They are also working to complete changes to the organisation’s Internal Oversight Charter.

The WIPO General Assemblies, being held this year from 3-11 October, are the main policy and decision-making bodies of WIPO. Treaty unions administered at WIPO meet during the Assemblies, such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty Union. The General Assemblies also consider reports of WIPO committees, such as the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SCP), and the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT).

Agreed Items

Decisions have been adopted on WIPO committee reports, such as the SCP, the SCT, the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC), the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP), the Committee on WIPO Standards, and the Advisory Committee on Enforcement (ACE).

General Assembly consensus was also reached in the different unions WIPO administers, such as: the Patent Cooperation Treaty; the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs; the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks; the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration; and the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled.

Delegates also agreed on an update on the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center’s activities “as an international resource for time- and cost-efficient alternatives to court litigation of intellectual property (IP) disputes,” according to the document [pdf].

Still Pending

Delegates are holding intensive informal sessions today and by tomorrow night are expected to come to agreement on the following remaining items on the agenda [pdf]:

Copyright Committee

During the report of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR), a decision could not be approved. The committee is currently discussing a potential treaty protecting broadcasting organisations, and exceptions and limitations to copyright for libraries, archives, education, research institutions, and persons with other disabilities than visual impairment.

Argentina requested on 5 October that the decision emphasise the need for expedited discussions on the broadcasting treaty. The decision has been discussed in informal consultations which had not been conclusive by press time today.

Industrial Design Treaty

Consensus also is still needed on whether to convene in 2017 a high-level meeting (diplomatic conference) to conclude a procedural treaty on industrial designs. Two unresolved issues in the draft treaty text could not find consensus at the meeting of the SCT this year. One of these is the inclusion of an article on technical assistance in the body of the treaty, rather than in a separate document. The other is the inclusion of an article allowing countries to request mandatory disclosure of origin in industrial design applications (IPW, WIPO, 28 April 2016).

Informal meetings have been conducted by the SCT chair Adil El Maliki of Morocco during the first week of the General Assembly, and delegates still have to agree on his language proposal for a decision.

WIPO External Offices

Informal consultations have also been conducted on the opening of new WIPO external offices in countries, and which three candidate countries should be chosen for the 2016/2017 biennium among a list of candidates. The last WIPO GA decided that preference should be given to Africa, which has two candidates designated by the African Group: Algeria and Nigeria. The Group of Latin American and Caribbean countries (GRULAC) has chosen Colombia as their candidate. Other candidates include India, Iran, Romania, and South Korea.

Three other candidates are to be chosen for the next biennium, 2018/2019. But that decision had not been foreseen to be taken this year. However, in order to relieve some tensions and agree on the three first countries this year, there might be a decision in the General Assembly for countries for 2018/2019 as well.

Internal Oversight Charter

A decision also has to be reached on a revision of the WIPO Internal Oversight Charter. Amb. Juan Raúl Heredia Acosta of Mexico conducted informal consultations last week and issued a proposed revision on 7 October (IPW, WIPO, 10 October 2016). The African Group said this morning that it is still reviewing the proposal.

New Electoral Cycle of the WIPO General Assembly Officers

Latvia proposed [pdf] that the electoral cycle of the WIPO General Assembly officers be revisited. WIPO has experienced “rather chaotic Assemblies with few outcomes,” the proposal said, and in order to increase efficiency, “election of a knowledgeable Chair is an important element.”

The new chair of the General Assembly should be elected at the end of the ordinary Assembly session, not at the beginning of it, so that the new chair can prepare his/her ordinary Assembly, the proposal said. Delegates still have to reach a decision on this proposal.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WIPO Assembly: IP-Watch Tally Of Finished And Pending Items" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, Enforcement, English, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.