• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

OECD Ministerial On Internet: Trust, But Whom?

23/06/2016 by Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Beware “digital protectionism.” That was one of the key messages of United States Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, speaking at the official opening of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Ministerial on the digital economy in Cancun, Mexico.

OECD logoThe high-level conference is the third OECD ministerial on the internet after 1999 and 2009, and overdue, OECD Secretary General Angel Gurria said on 22 June. He called for more rapid steps of governments to adapt to the digital world.

In opening speeches and the discussion with the stakeholder groups represented at the OECD for business, civil society, unions and the technical community, differences over the core agenda point of “trust” were visible.

Pritzker warned in her speech, “too often, well-intentioned efforts to address legitimate concerns over issues like privacy and security lead to unintended consequences.” In recent years there has been a “rush to throw up digital walls,” she said, listing “data localization laws,” “content controls,” and “onerous technical standards” as barriers to competition, innovation, and free expression.

On challenges for governments, Pritzker said: “cybersecurity threats are on the rise. Notions of privacy are being upended.” Different approaches in privacy between the US and the European Union currently are resolved through the “privacy shield,” Pritzker noted.

Balancing privacy with ease of data flows was on the other hand rejected most clearly by Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy Information Center [corrected]. Rotenberg is a member of the Steering Committee of the Civil Society Information Society Advisory Council (CSISAC), which spoke extensively on privacy, data protection and topics like “the secrets of surveillance capitalism” in their pre-ministerial meeting. Balancing rights was always tempting in politics, Rotenberg said, but fundamental rights cannot be traded.

Kathy Brown, speaking for the Internet Technical Advisory Committee (ITAC), put a new “trust framework” ISOC Trust Framework on the table to solve the trust issue by combining work in four dimensions: “user trust, trusted networks, technologies for trust and a trustworthy ecosystem.”

Earlier on the opening day, Ildefonso Guajardo Villareal, Mexico’s Minister of Economy and chair of the meeting, underlined that his government found most important the guarantee for healthy competition, strong protection of intellectual property and a commitment to free trade in services – for example by finalising the Trade in Services Agreement.

The OECD meeting will conclude on 23 June with the adoption of a joint declaration.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Monika Ermert may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"OECD Ministerial On Internet: Trust, But Whom?" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, English, ITU/ICANN, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Other International Orgs, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Trackbacks

  1. Links 23/6/2016: Red Hat Results, Randa Stories | Techrights says:
    23/06/2016 at 3:18 pm

    […] OECD Ministerial On Internet: Trust, But Whom? […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.