• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WHO-Led Study: Hepatitis C Treatment Unaffordable Globally, Threatens Health Systems

01/06/2016 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

According to a new study by experts at the World Health Organization, prices of hepatitis C treatments are unaffordable globally and put a major strain on national health systems. Hepatitis C can cause liver cirrhosis and cancer, and with an estimated 80 million people affected in the world, if untreated, the sickness could lead to 700,000 deaths per year worldwide, the study said, suggesting that governments and industry stakeholders should develop and implement fair pricing frameworks.

New hepatitis C virus medicines have “markedly improved treatment efficacy and regimen tolerability. However their high prices have limited access, prompting wide debate about fair and affordable prices,” the study [pdf] said. The study was published open access on PLOS.

The authors of the study are: Swathi Iyengar, Kiu Tay-Teo, Sabine Vogler, Peter Beyer, Stefan Wiktor, Kees de Joncheere, and Suzanne Hill. All are listed as officials at the WHO except Vogler, who is at the WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Health Economics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, Vienna, Austria.

The study compares the price and affordability of sofosbuvir, and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir across 30 countries, assessing affordability to health systems and patients.

Sofosbuvir belongs to Gilead Sciences.

The authors found that “the median nominal ex-factory price of a 12-week course of sofosbuvir across 26 OECD countries was US$42,017, ranging from US$37,729 in Japan to US$64,680 in the US [United States.]” The initial published list price in the US for a 12 week course of treatment with sofosbuvir andledipasvir/sofosbuvir were US$84,000 and US$94,500, respectively.

According to the study, “The manufacturer claimed the new regimen was equal to or less expensive than prior standard of care regimens because the new regimen had much higher cure rates and would reduce the total treatment costs of HCV, including the costs of medications, side effects, complications, and additional health services required.”

Another recent study estimated the cost of production of sofosbuvir to be US$68-US$136 for a 12 week course of treatment, “based on the same manufacturing methods used in the large-scale generic production of HIV/AIDS medicines,” the authors said, adding that the findings of this study have not been challenged.

The study underlines that tiered pricing agreements have been negotiated with some low- and middle-income countries, and voluntary licensing agreements established with 11 India-based generic pharmaceutical manufacturers to produce and distribute sofosbuvir in 101 countries. However, the licence does not cover 39 middle-income countries, including Brazil, China, Mexico and Turkey, the report says, while it is suggested that 73 percent of people with chronic hepatitis live in middle-income countries.

In their research, the authors said they found no observable relationship between the purchasing power parity (PPP)-adjusted price and potential market size.

For example, according to the study, Nordic countries had fewer people requiring treatment and had higher GDP per capita than countries such as Japan, Italy and Spain, but the PPP-adjusted prices of both medicines were much lower. “Although the GDP per capita in Turkey was only about $3,000 higher than in Brazil, the PPP-adjusted price of sofosbuvir in Turkey (PPP $70,331) was 7.2-fold higher than in Brazil (PPP $9,708).”

For countries, the budget impact estimates vary from PPP US$100.9 million (in Luxembourg) to PPP US$166.6 billion in the United States. Those numbers do not include the costs of diagnostic testing, other medicines, or other associated health service costs, the authors said.

For individuals having to pay out of pocket, the medicines would be virtually impossible to buy, they said, as the PPP-adjusted price of a full course of sofosbuvir would be equivalent to at least one year of the PPP-adjusted average earnings for individuals in 12 of the 30 countries analysed.

The report notes that some patients in high-income countries have been reported to import sofosbuvir at lower prices or even devise plan to receive treatment in India.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WHO-Led Study: Hepatitis C Treatment Unaffordable Globally, Threatens Health Systems" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, English, Finance, Health & IP, Human Rights, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, WHO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.