• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WIPO Members Set To Decide On Industrial Design Treaty Negotiation

25/04/2016 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

A potential treaty to facilitate international applications for industrial designs for creators is on the agenda of a meeting next week at the World Intellectual Property Organization. Also on the meeting agenda is the protection of country name registration and use as trademarks, and a proposed geographical indications filing system.

The 35th session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) is taking place from 25-27 April.

Two open issues have held up the decision to move to a high-level final negotiation on a design law treaty.

The SCT has been trying to agree on a set of draft articles [pdf] and draft regulations [pdf] for the treaty on industrial design. Two issues have prevented a consensus. The first one is whether an article on technical assistance and capacity should be included, as favoured by developing countries, or if technical assistance and capacity building should be dealt with through a resolution, which is the option supported by most developed countries.

The second issue is whether a requirement for disclosure of the origin of industrial design should be included in the treaty. The African Group has put forward a proposal for “disclosure of the origin or source of traditional cultural expressions (folklore), traditional knowledge or biological/genetic resources utilized or incorporated in the industrial design.” This is resisted by a number of developed countries.

If enough consensus is found on those two issues, a Preparatory Committee of the Diplomatic Conference of the Adoption of a Design Law Treaty (DLT) is expected to take place from 28-29 April. According to several sources from developed and developing countries, the issue of disclosure of origin is expected to be difficult this week.

According to the agenda [pdf] of the preparatory committee, the committee is expected to consider the Draft Rules [pdf] of Procedure of the Diplomatic Conference; and the draft agenda, dates, and venue [pdf] for the Diplomatic Conference.

The proposed date for the high-level treaty negotiation, or diplomatic conference, is from 12-22 June 2017, and the proposed venue is Geneva.

The United States and Japan have submitted a new proposal [pdf], which suggests discussions on the protection of new technological designs “in light of the current varied laws and practices regarding the protection of new technological designs and the clear absence of readily accessible information on this same topic.”

Protection of Country Names

The agenda [pdf] of the SCT meeting further includes discussions on the protection of country names against registration and use as trademarks.

In particular, delegates are expected to consider a document [pdf] prepared by the WIPO secretariat identifying different practices and approaches. Also on the table is a revised version of a 2014 proposal [pdf] by Jamaica on the protection of country names.

Geographical Indications

The SCT is also expected to consider several proposals dating back to previous sessions of the SCT on geographical indications.

In particular, a 2013 proposal [pdf] and a 2014 proposal [pdf] by the US suggesting to explore the feasibility of a geographical indications filing system “that would be inclusive for all national law protection mechanism.” It also asks the secretariat to undertake a study “to examine the various national law approaches to specific geographical indications topics where there is a lack of international understanding.”

Those proposals came in reaction to the work on an update of the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration to include geographical indications. The 2015 Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications was adopted amidst strong protests from non-members of the Lisbon Agreement prevented from a voting right in the diplomatic conference establishing the new act.

Another document on the agenda is a 2015 proposal [pdf] by France requesting the examination of national legislation and procedures relating to the protection of geographical indications.

Also on the agenda a 2015 proposal [pdf] of the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Moldova, Spain and Switzerland on the protection of geographical indications and country names in the domain name system.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WIPO Members Set To Decide On Industrial Design Treaty Negotiation" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Enforcement, English, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.