• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Companies Can Inoculate Themselves Against Patent Trolls Through Their Supply Chain

24/02/2016 by Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and are not associated with Intellectual Property Watch. IP-Watch expressly disclaims and refuses any responsibility or liability for the content, style or form of any posts made to this forum, which remain solely the responsibility of their authors.

By Tim Wilson

The well-worn phrase “no man is an island” may reflect a fundamental truth about the human condition, but it also provides wisdom into how to protect your company against patent trolls.

Organizations aren’t islands either. Every business operates in an interconnected ecosystem of partners, competitors, vendors, customers, and unfortunately, patent trolls. Companies must use a multi-pronged approach to combat patent trolls, but one critical prong has been overlooked: the supply chain.

To help keep patent trolls at bay, each company in a supply chain should inoculate itself against patent trolls or risk becoming a glaring Achilles heel that trolls can exploit. No vendor, regardless of size, is immune, especially in the tech, financial tech and automotive industries, which are primary patent troll targets.  Reducing any company’s exposure to patent trolls improves the business environment for the entire supply chain.

Self-Inflicted Damage

With the rise of the internet and increasing globalization, supply chains across industries are more complex than ever before. For example, General Motors uses over 800 suppliers to produce the Chevy Volt and Apple has suppliers in more than 30 countries round the world. Software supply chains have also grown more complex as open source software has exploded, with 78 percent of companies running on an amalgam of open-source software (a number that has doubled since 2010).

At the same time, patent trolls have also grown more aggressive. The Boston University School of Law published a study which found that over six times as many patent lawsuits are filed today as in 1980. More than 10,000 companies have been sued at least once by a patent troll and litigation by patent trolls using acquired patents is increasing at an alarming rate.  Last year, patent trolls scooped up over 6,000 high tech patents, creating additional exposure for all companies. Where did the patent trolls get these patents?  More than 80 percent of patents litigated by patent trolls are acquired from operating companies, and nearly 1,000 companies have transferred patents directly to patent trolls in recent years. In the hands of patent trolls, patents are weapons and the damage those weapons caused is somewhat self-inflicted.

First, Do No More Harm

When a supplier is facing a patent assertion claim, everyone in the supply chain suffers. Companies concerned about increasing risk of patent assertions can help mitigate that problem by involving their supply chain. One thing we do at SAS is to encourage our vendors to tell us how they are addressing the patent troll problem during the RFP process.

We think this is important for a number of reasons. For one, it helps to protect our business. Buying from a supplier at risk of patent assertions increases the vulnerability of our supply chain. Once we buy a product and it’s on our premises, we could be hit by a patent infringement lawsuit related to that item. Even if the supplier provides indemnification, we still have to deal with the litigation process and all of the potential negative outcomes. Therefore, we prefer to work with suppliers that can demonstrate they are thinking about the patent troll problem strategically and are, at a minimum, not selling patents to patent trolls. If a supplier has taken measures to curb the patent troll problem, it demonstrates good corporate citizenship.

The impact of this effort will not be felt until a critical mass of corporations, whether they make cars, mobile phones or financial software, ask potential suppliers what steps they have taken to inoculate themselves and the supply chain against patent trolls. Only then will suppliers be highly motivated to find ways to do so. They will think twice before selling a patent to a troll if it means potential contracts are at risk.

So what steps can suppliers take? The most effective is to join a community that works together to curb Patent Troll activity.

Today, there are a number of communities out there, run by both nonprofit and for-profit organizations, that help keep patents away from trolls. For example, the non-profit LOT Network, of which SAS is a member, represents a coalition of companies wherein any time a member company’s patents fall into the hands of a troll, all other member companies are granted a license to it, thereby providing immunity against patent troll litigation for the affected patents.

If a supplier participates in LOT Network, it shows that they’re concerned about the patent troll problem and are committed to working against it. It elevates the level of trust we have with that supplier and reduces our concern about getting hit with a patent assertion claim through our supply chain.

Squashing patent trolls must be a collective effort. The supply chains of all major industries must work together to effectively diminish the ability of patent trolls to thrive. To cure our economy of patent trolls requires a widespread, top-down, bottom-up, and across-the-board approach.

Tim Wilson

Tim Wilson

Tim Wilson began his legal career working in private practice at the law firm of Jones Day primarily focusing on patent litigation. He then worked in the law firm of Brown, Raysman in New York, NY, before joining the Legal Division of SAS Institute Inc. in 1998. He currently leads the patent team at SAS. Mr. Wilson is admitted in Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York. He is a member of the American Intellectual Property Law Association and the North Carolina State Bar Association. Tim is a member of the Editorial Board of Intellectual Property Magazine. Mr. Wilson graduated from Pennsylvania State University in 1989 and received his J.D. from the Syracuse University College of Law in 1992.

 

Image Credits: SAS

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Companies Can Inoculate Themselves Against Patent Trolls Through Their Supply Chain" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: Features, Inside Views, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Enforcement, English, IP Law, Innovation/ R&D, North America, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Regional Policy, WTO/TRIPS

Trackbacks

  1. Companies Can Inoculate Themselves Against Patent Trolls Through Their Supply Chain – LOT Network says:
    25/02/2016 at 5:23 pm

    […] Intellectual Property Article […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.