• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Ecuador, BRICS Moving Away From International Investment Dispute Regime, Paper Says

18/08/2015 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

As part of a series of publications on investment treaties and investor-state dispute settlement, a developing country multilateral organisation released a policy brief focusing on Ecuador’s experience and action against the current dispute settlement system.

The policy brief [pdf] is authored by Andres Arauz, now the Ecuadoran Minister of Knowledge and Human Talent, and published by the Geneva-based South Centre. It lays out the historical and geopolitical context of Ecuador’s decisions on bilateral investment treaties and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) procedures, and the current alternatives pursued by the Ecuadorian government.

Ecuadoran President Correa established in 2013 a joint government/civil society commission to study and audit its bilateral investment treaties and the international investment arbitration system, according to the policy brief.

According to the brief, some BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) “are moving away from the international investment arbitration regime.”

Such is the case of Brazil, which according to the brief, “has not ratified any treaties to date and is not a part of ICSID [International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes],” India, which “is reviewing all of its treaties and has signalled that it will withdraw from them, and South Africa, which “is withdrawing from all of these treaties and is not part of ICSID.”

The brief also remarks that Bolivia withdrew from all its treaties and from ICSID, and South America is establishing its own investment dispute settlement forum. Ecuador, according to the brief, is “leading the establishment of an international global South observatory of transnational investment disputes, in partnership with the South Centre, which hopes to share strategic information for legal defence and motivate collective action regarding the investment regime.”

Last month the South Centre published a policy brief on Argentina’s experience with ISDS (IPW, Bilateral/Regional Negotiations, 21 July 2015).

Image Credits: Flickr – Torl Rector

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Ecuador, BRICS Moving Away From International Investment Dispute Regime, Paper Says" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Africa, Asia/Pacific, Bilateral/Regional Negotiations, Development, Enforcement, English, Finance, Latin America/Caribbean, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Regional Policy, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, WTO/TRIPS

Trackbacks

  1. Moody's: International Investment Bank (IIB) benefits from strong financial … says:
    24/08/2015 at 7:59 pm

    […] Ecuador, BRICS Moving Away From International Investment Dispute Regime, Paper … As part of a series of publications on investment treaties and investor-state dispute settlement, a developing country multilateral organisation released a policy brief focusing on Ecuador's experience and action against the current dispute settlement … Read more on Intellectual Property Watch […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.