SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Latest Comments
  • So simply put, we have the NABP saying that all ph... »
  • The original Brustle decision was widely criticise... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    WIPO Shows Record Growth Across International IP Filing Systems

    Published on 13 March 2014 @ 7:03 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch and for Intellectual Property Watch

    “Intellectual property, in general, is in a growth mode, and in a growth mode which is considerably in excess of either the national GDP growth rates or the world GDP growth rates,” World Intellectual Property Organisation Director General Francis Gurry said today.

    At a press briefing in Geneva launching WIPO’s latest reports, Gurry presented the estimated number of filings under WIPO’s international IP filing systems for 2013. All three systems (the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), the Madrid system for trademarks, and the Hague system for industrial designs) experienced “considerable growth” in 2013.

    These numbers are an “indication of the use of IP around the world by different entities,” said Gurry.

    US and China Drive Record Filings Under PCT

    The PCT experienced a growth rate of 5.1 percent in 2013 as compared with the preceding year. For the first time, there were more than 200,000 patent applications filed in one year. It is also the IP system with the most number of participants – 150 countries.

    “The PCT is one of the best measures of the output of innovation of a corporation at the international level,” Gurry said.

    Gurry pointed to the US and China as the “principle drivers” of patent growth this year, together accounting for over 80 percent of the growth. The US filed an estimated 57,239 patents and Japan 43,918 patents in 2013. After these two countries, China stands in third place and for the first time overtook Germany.

    Gurry emphasised the “extraordinary” increase in growth of the leading Asian countries – China, Japan and South Korea – which accounted for 25 percent of the total share of PCT applications in 2007 and increased to 38 percent in 2013. [corrected]

    No other developing countries are in the top 10 countries for patent applications. Of developing countries, India saw the greatest number of patents filed in the PCT (1,392 patents), followed by Turkey (835), Brazil (661), South Africa (350) and Malaysia (310).

    In response to this, Gurry explained that it “requires considerable time, investment and development in order to have the technological capacity to be able to compete on that.”

    The findings “reflect that to become a producer of new state of the art technology, it requires an enormous effort across the whole of the economic system to construct a well functioning innovation ecosystem. That goes for everything from having an educational system through to having capital markets,” he said.

    When asked whether the findings show that the patent system does not benefit all, Gurry responded: “Innovation does benefit us all, our quality of life is improved significantly by innovation. We depend upon innovation in order to be able to respond to all social challenges we face as a society.”

    He also pointed to the “meteoric” rise in patent filings in China since 30 years ago when it established its patent law, to now overtaking Germany. He recognised that development is slower in other countries, but there is development, in Singapore and India for example.

    Looking at individual companies, Panasonic moved into first place again (as it has previously been first), surpassing ZTE in second place, last year’s top filer, and Huawei in third place. Gurry emphasised the country of origin of these companies: Japan, followed by 2 Chinese companies.

    For university users, Gurry said: “in the top 10, all but one of them are American institutions.”

    Significant growth in patent filings was noticed in the car manufacturing industry. Filings have almost doubled in the last 3 years, said Gurry, suggesting “lots is going on in the automobile industry in terms of innovation.”

    WIPO Chief Economist Carsten Fink said that the most important area of development in this industry relates to engine technology (fuel cells [corrected] and hybrid engines) and adapting information technology to the needs of the car.

    Fink noted that some of the big US car companies are not using the PCT system to the same extent as Japanese companies, so he advised against making comparisons between companies using PCT filings as an indicator. But he does believe the statistics reflect growth trends in this industry.

    Steady Increase in Applications for Industrial Designs

    Applications for industrial designs under the Hague system reached 2,990 in 2013, increasing by 14.8 percent since 2012. In total, these applications encompass 13,172 designs, as an application can contain up to 100 industrial designs.

    Switzerland, Germany and Italy were the top three countries for industrial design filings in 2013, filing 662, 643 and 419 applications respectively. These three countries accounted for 58 percent of the total Hague system applications, according to a WIPO press release.

    Swiss company Swatch was for the second consecutive year the top applicant for protection under the Hague system, with 113 applications, followed by Philips (Netherlands, 82 applications) and Procter & Gamble (United States, 76 applications).

    Gurry announced that he expects the Hague system to grow very significantly in the coming 12 months, as South Korea, United States, Japan, Russia and China could join the system, which he said will help them become much more globalised.

    New Members Drive Rise in Trademark Applications

    Under the Madrid system of international registration of marks, 46,829 applications for international protection of trademarks were filed in 2013, representing a growth rate of 6.4 percent.

    However, “this evolution does not give as accurate a reflection as the PCT system” of global IP growth in the area of trademarks, said Gurry, because several countries recently joined the Madrid system, such as India, Mexico, the Philippines and New Zealand.

    Swiss company Novartis was the top company to file trademarks, filing 228 trademark applications in 2013, followed by the Zentiva Group (Czech Republic, 114 applications) and Egis Gyógyszergyár (Hungary, 111 applications).

    Germany (6,822 applications), United States (6,043 applications) and France (4,239 applications) were the top three countries of origin of trademark registrations.

    Computers & electronics (9,978), services for business (8,432), and technological services (6,112) were the top classes of trademarks reflected in applications. But the fastest growth in 2013 related to trademarks filed for pharmaceuticals and other preparations for medical purposes, and foodstuffs of plant origin.

    The countries and areas in which applicants most seek to protect their trademarks are in China, Russia and the EU.

    Switzerland’s Notable Performance; Big Increase for Turkey

    Gurry singled out the notable performance of Switzerland, as the top applicants of the Hague and Madrid systems were Swiss companies. Moreover, Switzerland came 8th for PCT filings, 1st for design applications and 4th for trademark applications. “It is a position well above its weight in terms of population and economic growth,” Gurry considered.

    The greatest growth of international IP applications filed by middle-income countries was seen in Turkey. It showed an increase of applications under the PCT of 56.1 percent since 2012, a less significant increase under the Madrid system of 1.67% and despite a minor decrease in applications under the Hague system for industrial design, Turkey occupies 7th place.

    A press release on the event and further statistics can be found here on the WIPO website.

    Maëli Astruc may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

    Julia Fraser may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.227.63.195