• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Privatize, Don’t Internationalise, Internet Oversight, Academics Say

04/03/2014 by Intellectual Property Watch 8 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch

The Snowden revelations have spurred yet another discussion on how to internationalise or globalise the oversight over the management of core infrastructures of the internet, namely the so-called IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) functions. Why not let the private sector decide?

This week, academics Prof. Milton Mueller and Brenden Kuerbis of Syracuse University, experts in internet governance issues, filed their concept for reform with NetMundial, the upcoming conference in Brazil on the future of internet governance.

The NETmundial conference is scheduled for 23-24 April in Sao Paolo.

Instead of internationalising government control by moving oversight from the US Commerce Department National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to a more inclusive body of governments, they recommend privatisation.

A Domain Name System Authority (DNSA) governed by top-level domain (like .com) registries and the operators of the 13 authoritative root servers of the domain name system would be in charge of managing changes to the DNS root zone.

Development of policies would continue to be performed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) through its multi-stakeholder processes which involve government representatives.

The allocation of internet IP address blocs for further distribution through the five regional internet registries (RIRs) would for the time being also stay with ICANN, while the protocol parameter registry would be moved to its user, the Internet Engineering Task Force.

While proposing a bold step away from the much-debated US oversight, the proposal would allow the fulfilment of the original privatisation promise of the Clinton administration in the creation of ICANN, the authors said.

At the same time, it could cut the Gordian knot of how to involve other governments. One European Union commissioner years ago proposed a council of a dozen or so government members. Also, the existing ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) has been mentioned as a potential successor to the NTIA.

The Mueller-Kuerbis proposal, made through the Internet Governance Project at Syracuse, has already sparked some discussion, coming at a time when ICANN is trying to cut its original strong US ties a little more.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Privatize, Don’t Internationalise, Internet Oversight, Academics Say" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, English, ITU/ICANN, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Comments

  1. Riaz Tayob says

    04/03/2014 at 11:42 am

    Well Mueller started off well in his ‘Ruling the root’ but then got sidetracked… once even asserting that the laws of California are a good jurisdiction for an international resource (talk about non-cosmopolitan!)! Now we have the global genocide of privacy by the NSA and 5is, and American politicos talking about everyone else as if their privacy rights don’t matter. And the answer is, privatisation? Really now, after the financial crisis this is the solution… it seems like everyone has to be a neocon in the US just to be heard! This is absolutely crazy. Where are all the public interest technical experts that are supposed to be for human rights up to now? Not a single one I recall from IETF, ICANN, IANA, etc… and in civil society, let us not even start with the neocons that are enabled and encouraged by UN processes. In fact, much of the interests are private corporate sector, and net neutrality is even being trashed. We have had two examples of private regulation that have gone bad, the financial sector and the internet. The common sense rule (barring all the high falutent academic blather and frothing) is that you don’t let a drunk drive a school bus after having made an accident… duh!

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Privatize, Don’t Internationalise, Internet Oversight, Academics Say | DomainNewsAfrica says:
    12/03/2014 at 1:41 pm

    […] The Mueller-Kuerbis proposal, made through the Internet Governance Project at Syracuse, has already sparked some discussion, coming at a time when ICANN is trying to cut its original strong US ties a little more. Read more […]

    Reply
  2. La gobernanza de Internet: ¿Ensayo de la gobernanza del mundo? | La pupila insomne says:
    20/03/2014 at 2:31 pm

    […] [13] Monika Ermert, “Privatize, Don’t Internationalise, Internet Oversight, Academics Say”, Intellectual Property Watch, 4 de marzo de 2014. http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/03/04/privatize-dont-internationalise-internet-oversight-academics-say/ […]

    Reply
  3. Nuevas TIC´s. 2014: La gobernanza de Internet: ¿Ensayo de la gobernanza del mundo? | Liwen ñi Mapu & Asoc. Colectivo Red de Noticias e Información sobre Pueblos Indígenas y Derechos Humanos says:
    20/03/2014 at 3:37 pm

    […] Internet Oversight, Academics Say”, Intellectual Property Watch, 4 de marzo de 2014.http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/03/04/privatize-dont-internationalise-internet-oversight-academics-say/ %5B14%5D  Julia Powles, “US pledges to loosen grip on net. Don’t be fooled”, Wired, 18 de marzo […]

    Reply
  4. ¿ES LA GOBERNANZA DE LA INTERNET UN ENSAYO DE LA GOBERNANZA DEL MUNDO? | EL REVOLUCIONARIO ESCARLATA says:
    20/03/2014 at 6:17 pm

    […] [13] Monika Ermert, “Privatize, Don’t Internationalise, Internet Oversight, Academics Say”, Intellectual Property Watch, 4 de marzo de 2014.http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/03/04/privatize-dont-internationalise-internet-oversight-academics-say/ […]

    Reply
  5. Internet governance: Testing the governance of the world?. | Cuba Inside The World says:
    20/03/2014 at 7:21 pm

    […] Internet Oversight, Academics Say,” Intellectual Property Watch, March 4 2014. http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/03/04/privatize-dont-internationalise-internet-oversight-academics-say/ [14] Julia Powles, “U.S. pledges to loosen grip on net. Do not be fooled, “Wired, […]

    Reply
  6. La gobernanza de Internet: ¿Ensayo de la gobernanza del mundo? | Cuba Online says:
    21/03/2014 at 3:51 pm

    […] [13] Monika Ermert, “Privatize, Don’t Internationalise, Internet Oversight, Academics Say”, Intellectual Property Watch, 4 de marzo de 2014. http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/03/04/privatize-dont-internationalise-internet-oversight-academics-say/ […]

    Reply
  7. La gobernanza de Internet: ¿Ensayo de la gobernanza del mundo? #Cuba, #Francia, #España, #Madrid, #Càdiz,#Bélgica, #Bruselas, #Lusemburgo, #Argentina, #Bolivia, #Brasil, #Ecuador, #México, #Nicaragua, #Honduras, #Colombia, #Venezuela, #Miam says:
    23/03/2014 at 3:59 pm

    […] [13] Monika Ermert, “Privatize, Don’t Internationalise, Internet Oversight, Academics Say”, Intellectual Property Watch, 4 de marzo de 2014. http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/03/04/privatize-dont-internationalise-internet-oversight-academics-say/ […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.