SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Latest Comments
  • So simply put, we have the NABP saying that all ph... »
  • The original Brustle decision was widely criticise... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Conclusions From Top Trademark Offices Meeting

    Published on 22 December 2013 @ 2:38 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    Five top trademark offices, which call themselves the TM5, met earlier this month in Seoul, South Korea, and agreed on seminars, reports and other activities intended to improve their coordination and help fight bad practices.

    The meeting of the trademark offices of China, Europe, Japan, South Korea and the United States met from 5-6 December. According to a 6 December release by the Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the group “agreed to enhance cooperation in the trademark field focusing on users.” Japan will act as secretariat for the 2014 annual meeting of the TM5, it said.

    Intellectual Property Watch interviewed the Korean director of trademark and design about the event (IPW, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, 8 November 2013).

    A joint statement released on 20 December provides more details on the outcomes of the meeting.

    The full joint statement is as follows:

     

    TM5 ANNUAL MEETING

    Seoul, Republic of Korea, 5-6 December 2013

    JOINT STATEMENT

    The Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trademarks and Designs) (OHIM), the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), (hereinafter referred to as the “Partners”) held the 2013 TM5 Annual Meeting in Seoul, Republic of Korea on 5-6 December 2013.

    The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) was present as an observer, as it had been at the previous TM5 meeting. In addition, representatives of various user associations participated in the open session of the meeting. That session was productive and useful.

    During the Meeting, the Partners exchanged views and information on practices and programs, as well as on common projects aiming at promoting cooperation and collaboration among the Partners and contributing to increasingly user-friendly trademark systems.

     

    The Partners reached the following conclusions:

    Trademarks

    1. Continuation/ Expansion of Bad Faith- led by the JPO with the participating offices of KIPO, OHIM, SAIC and USPTO

    • The Partners agreed that JPO will host a seminar on bad-faith filing on the margins of the upcoming INTA annual meeting in Hong Kong, in May in 2014. JPO will extend invitations to each of the four TM5 partners.
    • The Partners agreed that at the upcoming mid-year meeting of the TM5 in Hong Kong, the JPO will present a draft Report on the TM5 partners’ respective laws and examination practices that pertain to bad faith filings. The partners further agreed that JPO will present a proposed final version of that Report at the annual TM 5 meeting in 2014.
    • The Partners noted that, before JPO finalizes its Report, certain of the Partners’ relevant laws and/or examination guideline may be amended. If that occurs, the Partner in question, may, as appropriate, either revise the answers it provided to the questionnaire that was the basis for the Report, or clarify that the law or examination guideline referred to in the questionnaire will come into effect on a particular date. The final Report that JPO will issue will reflect any such revisions or clarifications.
    • Concerning that questionnaire, the JPO will provide the Partners with copies of the responses it received from each of the Partners by the end of 2013.

     

    2. Image Search- led by the JPO with the participating offices of KIPO, OHIM, SAIC and USPTO

    • The Partners agreed that the Image Search Project is useful and it should be continued.
    • Future discussions regarding image searching may be devoted to identifying – and discussing possible solutions to – problems that arise in the area of image searching. In addition, those Partners that are developing image search systems may wish to share their experiences.
    • The Partners agreed that the JPO will host a working-level meeting in Japan in March or April of 2014, at which Partners can share information, and at which JPO may present its interim report on image searching.

     

    3. Common Statistical Indicators- led by the OHIM with the participating offices of JPO, KIPO, SAIC and USPTO

    • The JPO, the KIPO, the OHIM and the SAIC may exchange data once a year on a calendar year basis, in January of each year. In addition, the USPTO may provide its data based on its fiscal year, which commences on October 1 of each year.
    • With regard to KPI 1(Trademark Application), the OHIM may choose to provide data regarding filings at both OHIM and at the EU National Offices.
    • The Partners agreed that it could be beneficial to conduct working-level discussions on the statistics, including discussions on how to provide data regarding the number of examiners at each Partner office. Such discussions could be helpful, since the various Partners may define the term “examiner” differently.
    • The Partners will share their own forecast estimate on the condition that it is used for internal purpose. In addition, the Partners may determine whether they wish to share the information regarding forecasting methodologies.
    • Statistical indicators will be published in the TM5 website.

     

    4. User-friendly access to trademark information- led by the OHIM with the participating offices of JPO, KIPO, SAIC and USPTO

    • OHIM reported that trademark data from the USPTO and the KIPO will be searchable in TM view in December 2013. In addition, the feasibility study of JPO and SAIC will be carried out in 2014.

     

    5. Common Status Descriptors- led by the USPTO, with the participating offices of JPO, KIPO, OHIM and SAIC

    • The Partners agreed that each would adopt proposed levels 0 and 1 of the descriptors.
    • In addition, by January 15, 2014, the Partners will provide views on: the remaining proposed levels, on the visual status “ICONS” that the USPTO proposed, on the meaning of the term ‘dismissed’ in level 2, and on whether KIPO’s proposals with respect to use of the terms ‘invalidated’ and ‘abandoned’.

     

    6. TM5 Website- led by the KIPO, with the participating offices of JPO, USPTO, OHIM and SAIC.

    • The Partners noted their appreciation of the TM5 web site, and noted as that the web site can be of great use in enhancing cooperation among the Partners and in assisting users.
    • The Partners agreed to launch the website as soon as possible, and to provide feedback on the proposed “TM5 Website Operation Regulation” and on the interface, by December 20, 2013. The KIPO expects to launch the web-site in the beginning of 2014.

     

    7. Taxonomy and TMClass link-led by OHIM with the participating offices of JPO, KIPO, SAIC and USPTO

    • The Partners agreed that the technical meeting in Washington D.C was very useful and agreed to hold additional technical meetings if all agree that such meetings are both feasible and appropriate.
    • The OHIM noted that the Taxonomy project is not yet completed, and assured the Partners that once the structure of taxonomy is agreed to, the OHIM will not change that structure without the agreement of the Partners.
    • In the future, OHIM will provide the Partners with information regarding consultations on Taxonomy that it may conduct with other organizations, including WIPO.
    • The JPO proposed to provide Japanese translations to contribute to the development of TMclass and the Partners welcomed that proposal.

     

    8. ID list- led by USPTO with the participating offices of JPO, KIPO, OHIM and SAIC

    • The Partners agreed to adopt the proposal that, when rejecting a proposed new entry to the ID list, each Partner will signify the basis for its rejection by selecting one of the eight grounds for rejection identified at the technical meeting held in Washington in October in 2013.
    • The Partners agreed to invite IP offices from the ASEAN region to participate in the project, and further agreed that the USPTO, as the lead office, would send letters of invitation to such offices.
    • The Partners agreed that it would be helpful to conduct working-level discussions regarding the Draft Rules of Governance for the ID list project and the text of the Memorandum of Cooperation that memorializes the participation of non- TM5 members in the effort.
    • The Partners accepted the JPO’s proposal to invite WIPO to consider integrating the TM5 ID list into WIPO’s goods and services manager.

     

    9. Session with users- led by the host country with the participating offices of JPO, KIPO, OHIM, SAIC and USPTO

    • At the session for representatives of user organizations, KIPO introduced fifty one attendees from groups including GRUR and ICC(OHIM), JIPA, JPAA, JTA(JPO), KOTA, KINPA, KAPP(KIPO), ABA, AIPLA, INTA, IPO(USPTO). There were approximately forty questions from users.
    • The Partners noted that a central purpose of their joint work and of the annual meetings, was to benefit their users. The Partners further agreed that at future meetings, they should allow additional time for sessions with users.

     

    The following new projects were presented and discussed.

     

    10. Comparative Analysis on Examination Results- proposed by KIPO

    • The KIPO assured that the objective of this project was not the harmonization of each partner’s laws, practices. In addition, it confirmed that the partners will discuss and agree upon the subjects, detailed categories and the number of cases to be analyzed by the Partners.
    • The Partners agreed that the project would be beneficial to both the Partners and to users. The Partners adopted the KIPO’s proposals, with the understanding that the precise details of the project would be explored and agreed to at the working level. The Partners furthered agreed to cooperate with the KIPO in implementing the project, and agreed that they would discuss the details of such implementation, including the appropriate uses of the data to be gathered.

     

    11. Improve Convenience of Applicants of the Madrid Protocol by Enriching Information Provision- proposed by the JPO

    • The Partners welcomed this proposal, and agreed that they should conduct additional discussions regarding the proposal. In particular, the Partners agreed to conduct further discussions during the next mid-term meeting in 2014, and to provide views to the JPO in advance of that meeting.

     

    Discussion on TM5 Cooperation

     

    1. Project Maintenance
    • The Partners welcomed the OHIM’s proposal on project maintenance, and also agreed that the Partner Office that is responsible for maintaining a particular project should craft project maintenance plans whose form and content is based on characteristics of the project in question.

    2.   Proposal on Operating TM5 Working Group

    • The Partners welcomed the proposal by the KIPO to form Working Groups and decided to have Working Group meetings, in cases where such meetings are appropriate and feasible.
    • The Partners will also explore which means might be appropriate for conducting particular working group meetings, such as digital videoconferences.
    • At the 2014 mid-term meeting, the Partners will discuss how best to organize and operate the different working groups, and the details regarding any meetings they may wish to convene.

     

    2014 TM5 Secretariat

    • The Partners agreed that JPO will act as the secretariat for the 2014 TM5 meetings.

     

    Design

    The Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trademarks and Designs) (OHIM), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (hereinafter referred to as the “Design Partners”) and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) participated in the “TM5” Annual Meeting held in Seoul, the Republic of Korea on 5-6 December 2013.

    The OHIM as the lead office of design drawing and view catalogue project presented a draft of the catalogue and raised possible issues on the follow-up plan for the project.

    The Design Partners discussed the maintenance method and the possibility of publication for users filing design applications in all respective countries and territories (the United States of America, the Republic of Korea, Japan and the European Union) as well as international design applications with WIPO.

    The Design Partners agreed to refine the current draft of catalogue by March 1, 2014 and decide whether and how it is shared with users no later than the next TM5 Mid-term Meeting.

    The Design Partners updated each other on the latest amendments to design legislation. Additionally, the JPO shared a recent design-related court case with other partners.

    The Design Partners informed each other of their Hague Agreement accession and/or implementation efforts.

    The Design Partners exchanged information and views on the design system and practices in their respective offices and discussed specific issues (DAS for Designs, grace period, design search system, examination quality review system and registrability of minimalist design and architectural design).

    The Design Partners agreed to decide to consider the project proposed by the KIPO (development of a design registrability/patentability comparison report) at the next TM5 Mid-term Meeting. KIPO offered to take the lead of this project and share a project brief.

    The Design Partners discussed the impact of other design jurisdictions outside of the Design Partners.

     

    Possible areas for future discussion at the TM5 Annual Meeting in 2014

    • The Design Partners agreed to update each other on the latest amendments to their Design legislation.
    • The Design Partners agreed to discuss the quality review systems applied in their offices for Design Examination processes.
    • The Design Partners agreed to discuss the further enhancement of the design search system.
    • The Design Partners agreed to discuss the possible use of electronic priority document exchange via DAS in the future.

     

    2014 TM5 Secretariat

    The Design Partners agreed that JPO will act as the secretariat for the 2014 TM5 meetings.

     

     

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 213.136.75.83