SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Latest Comments
  • So simply put, we have the NABP saying that all ph... »
  • The original Brustle decision was widely criticise... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    WTO: Antigua To Retaliate Against US By Suspending IP Rights Protection

    Published on 28 January 2013 @ 11:45 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    After years of unsuccessful negotiations between nations, the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body today gave Antigua and Barbuda the right to impose sanctions against the United States for blocking online gambling. The US was found in violation of WTO rules in 2007 and has failed to resolve the issue, so the Caribbean nation was given the right to retaliate in an area that is likely to force a US response: lifting US intellectual property rights. [Update: US DSB statement added]

    At the DSB meeting today, it was announced that the DSB agreed to the request by Antigua and Barbuda for authorization to apply sanctions against the US consistent with the arbitrator decision on the dispute concerning the cross-border supply of gambling and betting services, according to sources.

    Antigua and Barbuda said in its statement to the DSB that it has lost billions of dollars and thousands of jobs, that it has been “patient, open and creative,” and has never received a settlement proposal from the US. “They have simply failed to respond or do anything,” it said. The country said that the retaliation against US IP rights is sanctioned and not piracy, as the US is trying to make it out to be.

    The amount of sanctions requested by Antigua and Barbuda cannot exceed US$21 million annually. The violation was of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), but as the small country has little to sanction in that area without doing harm to itself, it was permitted to cross-retaliate under the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The related WTO documents are WT/DS285/25 and WT/DS285/ARB.

    Antigua and Barbuda in its statement rejected as “disingenuous” and an “unhelpful red herring” the US argument that the commitment in relation to gambling in the US GATS (services) schedule was an error or was unintentional. And it said it will apply the suspension of concessions and other obligations “in a reasonable and responsible manner”.

    And it rejected US arguments that it has banned all online gambling for health and safety reasons because of its pernicious nature, as it said the industry could be regulated. But it especially took issue with assertions that it will be engaging in piracy.

    “To accuse our country of somehow being an International outlier by doing what the rules provide we can do, while at the same time confiscating the money of our operators held in global accounts and subjecting our operators to prison terms under laws held inconsistent with GATS pretty much beggars belief,” it said.

    Dominica, on behalf of the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) members, made a statement in support of Antigua and Barbuda.

    Antigua and Barbuda issued a press release, available here.

    [Update:] The United States, in its statement to the DSB, available here [pdf, see item 6], called withdrawal of Antigua and Barbuda’s obligations under the intellectual property agreement “theft” and “government-authorised piracy.” It said it has offered “real and substantial benefits” to Antigua and Barbuda.

    The US expressed disappointment with Antigua and Barbuda’s “misplaced decision to abandon constructive settlement discussions.” It said it understood the two sides to be “making progress on a settlement that would bring real benefits to Antigua.” But a crux of the US position in the case is that it “never intended gambling and betting services to be included in its schedule under the GATS.” With GATS, countries volunteered commitments in different areas at the time of negotiation.

    “As a result of ambiguities in drafting, and despite the intent of the U.S. negotiators, the Appellate Body ultimately found that the U.S. schedule must be construed as including a market access commitment for cross-border gambling.” It said it has accepted the results of the DSB and has responded responsibly. It has reached agreement will interested WTO members, except Antigua and Barbuda, on a compensation package of adjustments to the US GATS schedule. It warned Antigua and Barbuda that proceeding with sanctions will undermine chances for a settlement and impede foreign investment in the country. [end update]

    Steve Metalitz, counsel to International Intellectual Property Alliance, a major US content industry group, said in a statement: “We are of the firm view that suspending intellectual property rights is not the right solution, and that state sanctioned theft is an affront to any society. Should Antigua determine to move forward in this manner, it would certainly interfere with the ability to reach a negotiated resolution, and would harm the interests of Antiguans.” But he did not give any indication why Antigua and Barbuda should believe more progress will be made now than in the past five years.

    The country had a response to this in its statement. “[N]o longer can we, or of most importance, our citizens, be placated with empty promises and dissembling,” it said. “If the United States wants to avoid the consequences of our resort to our rights under the DSU [WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding], we would encourage them to act, and act quickly.”

    Infojustice.org has prepared an analysis of the decision, here. It says Antigua will set up a website offering infringing American content.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Cross Retaliating Against Intellectual Property: Pirates of the Carribean? | Paper Ninja says:

      [...] holders. (I deliberately use the term “legally” pirate, if only to evoke a paradox). Several articles cover this interesting development which will no doubt have significant ramifications on our [...]

    2. Caribbean copyright showdown | Inside Story says:

      [...] from copyright industry groups. The International Intellectual Property Alliance immediately warned of lost revenue, jobs and “state-sanctioned theft.” Certainly, the term pirate site brings to [...]

    3. Infojustice: Antigua And Barbuda Prepares To Suspend US Intellectual Property Rights | Intellectual Property Watch says:

      [...] Background on the dispute and the WTO rules can be found here. [...]

    4. KRISHNA says:

      The retaliation by Antigua should be supported by all Developing countries. US’s strong arm twisting methods should be condemned.


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.226.207.27