SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Ten Questions About Internet Governance

On April 23 in Sao Paulo, Brazil, the “Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance,” also known as “NETmundial” in an allusion to the global football event that will occur later in that country, will be convened. Juan Alfonso Fernández González of the Cuban Communications Ministry and a veteran of the UN internet governance meetings, raises 10 questions that need to be answered at NETmundial.


Latest Comments
  • These obscured negotiations appear to this reader ... »
  • The EU or the US are not the banana states for whi... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Syngenta Opens Doors To Its Patented Technologies, For Easier But Not Free Access

    Published on 18 January 2013 @ 12:15 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    A new innovation platform launched yesterday by Syngenta, the international agri-business company, means to broaden availability to some patented traits and technologies for vegetables, but also aims at opening new ways to use the intellectual property system.

    The e-licensing platform, named TraitAbility, provides “quick and easy” access to patented native traits of Syngenta commercial vegetable varieties. It also provides access to patented enabling technologies, like plant transformation and protein targeting.

    In the perspective of a growing world population expected to reach nine billion people by 2050, Alexander Tokarz, head of the vegetables section at Syngenta said at a press briefing in Geneva on 17 January: “We need a concerted effort and a lot of innovation.”

    “We need more off the same land,” by increasing productivity through better agricultural inputs, in particular better seeds and better genetics, he said.

    Taking an example from a developed country, Tokarz said “If you are a farmer needing to increase productivity, you are not likely to save your seeds from last year anymore like you may have done 20 years ago,”  because that would achieve the opposite. The farmer would instead look for the best variety fitting his specific needs.

    But innovation goes beyond productivity, he said. For example, “[we need] vegetables that transport better, keep longer on the shelves, taste better, have different colours, different flavours, different textures than what we used to have 20 years ago,” he said. “We want our food to be more nutritional, more healthy and more readily available at low prices,” and all of this needs innovation, he said.

    “We find there is still a somewhat romantic view in the public about how to achieve this,” Tokarz said. People picture the farmers selecting the best seeds from the field but it is not like that anymore, he added, as seed plant breeding is a high-tech industry today.

    Farmer-saved seeds have long been a bone of contention between farmers and breeders, as the latter claim royalties on saved seeds from original protected varieties while farmers are fighting for the right to save, use and exchange their farm seeds. Seed exchange has also been praised by some as a key factor of agrobiodiversity conservation.

    “Like Killing the Goose that Lays the Golden Eggs”

    Michael Kock, head of intellectual property at Syngenta, said there is a lot of disagreement about the role of intellectual property in the context of agricultural innovation, with some seeing it as an innovation enabler while some others considered it as a disabler.

    “One thing is clear,” he said, “IP as such does not feed the world,” but innovation and breeding progress would. However, new plants are not created “in an empty space,” he added. Each new plant is built upon an existing plant and access to genetic diversity and to innovation is key, he said.

    “Abandoning IP to foster access to innovation is potentially a very short-sighted solution,” he said. “It is like killing the goose which lays the golden eggs,” with today’s innovations becoming accessible but jeopardising the incentive for future ones.

    New plants are high-tech products and developing them is very expensive, time-consuming and risky, he said. However, those products are easy to copy and can be propagated by other breeders, by farmers and even home gardeners, and IP is necessary to protect the incentive to invest and take risk, he added.

    Another benefit of the IP system is that it allows the disclosure of innovation, allowing further innovations. The negative perception of IP is based on its use, in particular its use to exclude others and to limit access to innovation, but Syngenta thinks that IP should not translate into an exclusion but rather foster innovation and technology dissemination, and at the same time ensure a fair return on risk-taking and investment, he said.

    Open collaboration and open innovation are fundamental drivers for innovation because no single company, regardless of its size, has all the elements together to address the many areas the plant industry needs to address, such as resistance against diseases, drought, or better nutritional value and performance.

    Innovation used to be largely driven by individuals and individual companies but today, innovation is driven more by collaboration and integration, and if the IP system is unable to adapt, it may become extinct, he said.

    TraitAbility will help breeders obtain licences on a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) basis, said Christine Gould, senior manager for global public policy at Syngenta. The resource is free for academic and non-governmental organisation as long as it is for research purposes, she said.

    The system will also help transparency in making public what varieties have patented traits and will alleviate concerns about the freedom to operate, she said. Syngenta is hoping that this initiative will be taken up by more companies and will represent a new way of doing business in the seed industry, she said. TraitAbility is a creative way to leverage the company’s innovations, not by blocking others but by making them more accessible than ever before, she added.

    Open Innovation Inevitable but IP System Will Adapt

    During a policy debate panel organised later in the day by Syngenta, several speakers commented on open innovation solutions.

    Among those speakers, Shaifali Puri, executive director of Scientists without Borders, said the new generation of scientists are not necessarily motivated by IP protection. They were born “digital natives” and some believe that knowledge should not be kept behind closed doors. Young scientists are part of an emerging crystalizing ethos that values notion of democratic dissemination of knowledge and science evolves with the scientists, she said.

    In this context of open innovation, Puri said, IP will not be driven by technology but more by a mindset shift. IP will not be viewed from its traditionally defensive posture but rather seen as a wealth of intellectual knowledge generated daily in labs of multilateral corporations and universities which is actually a source of potential untapped value. Institutions which will thrive will see themselves not only possessing the value of their IP but actually value global expertise to mix their own knowledge and resources with that existing value, she said. Some institutions already have opened up their IP to innovation outside of their traditional R&D network, such as patent pools, she added.

    Geertrui Van Overwalle, professor at the Centre for Intellectual Property Rights at the University of Leuven, Belgium, said the current IP framework might not have to be changed to accommodate open innovation but actors and stakeholders should tailor and use IP to make it more lenient for open innovation.

    Javad Mozafari Hashjin, chairperson of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, speaking through a recorded video message, said the crop production systems of the future should help farmers to achieve more with less.

    Innovation and breeding new adapted varieties with high yield and nutritional value becomes key to achieving food security, he said, adding that appropriate policies providing incentive for investing in plant genetic research and breeding are needed. “This is where IP policy becomes a key requirement for food security,” Mozafari Hashjin said. Open innovation systems can contribute to globally accessible and affordable crop technologies.

    The treaty recognises innovation made both by farmers, and innovation and research undertaken by breeders through modern science, said Shakeel Bhatti, secretary of the plant treaty.

    Luigi Guiarino, senior scientist at the Global Crop Diversity Trust said innovation also needs well-functioning gene banks, which need to be part of innovation, and need support and nurturing. Focusing on the business end of the pipeline can obscure the need for support and innovation at the other end, he said. Gene banks, given the means and support, could do much better to make their content available for breeders, he said.

    The concepts presented by the private sector, including the need for high-tech innovations as the unique solution to addressing the challenge of a growing population, has been challenged by a number of civil society groups. In particular they are opposing the use of arable land to produce biofuels, as this is competing with food production, and view patents as a potential risk for food security.

    The United Nations Special Rapporteur for the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter, has also been advocating [pdf] agroecology, in which there is a focus on famers’ knowledge and experimentation rather than techniques delivered “top-down,” and an agricultural system with less chemical inputs.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. TraitAbility and the Treaty says:

      [...] some way paved the way, or helped create the space, for what Syngenta at any rate is heralding as something of an innovation. And second, because, whether or not there was in fact such a causal link with the ITPGRFA, the [...]

    2. Report On Antitrust Concerns: Seed Companies Working To Extend IPRs To Control Global Food | Intellectual Property Watch says:

      [...] mentions the Syngenta’s e-licensing platform, named TraitAbility, and launched in January (IPW, Patent/Design policy, 18 January 2013). The platform, which claims to offer a “free research licence for academic or non-for-profit [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.204.68.109