SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Latest Comments
  • So simply put, we have the NABP saying that all ph... »
  • The original Brustle decision was widely criticise... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    WIPO Design Treaty: Work On Articles, Capacity Building Next Time

    Published on 15 December 2012 @ 6:27 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    At the close of a World Intellectual Property Organization meeting dedicated solely to a potential new treaty on industrial design law and practice, delegates agreed to continue working on the draft instrument at the next session. But they will also have to address divergent views on how to integrate technical assistance and capacity building into the treaty.

    The 28th session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) met from 10-14 December.

    The summary by the meeting chair [pdf] was released at the beginning of the afternoon of the final day and was followed by a long informal discussion on the wording of the document, in particular on two proposals on technical assistance and capacity building which will become working documents at the next session of the meeting. One of those proposals was made by the African Group, the other one by the European Union (IPW, WIPO, 13 December 2012). The summary of the chair was adopted with some changes in the wording.

    The chair of the SCT, Imre Gonda of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, told Intellectual Property Watch that progress was made on the draft articles and regulations, though he did not specify.

    The conclusion adopted by the WIPO General Assembly in October prompted a deeper involvement by delegates in drafting discussions. The General Assembly requested SCT members to expedite work with “a view to advance substantially the basic proposals for a Design Law Treaty” (IPW, WIPO, 10 December 2012). Gonda said this decision prompted work from the experts on a technical level.

    In addition, “a number of delegations used the time between the last session and this one to reconsider their position and some individual proposals were withdrawn,” he said. One of such example was Brazil withdrawing its proposal to include “indications concerning the identity of the creator of the industrial design” to the list of filing-date requirements in paragraph (1)” in Article 5 (Filing date). Most draft articles and draft regulations include a series of footnotes reflecting proposals by countries at previous sessions.

    Pricklier was the second mandate of the General Assembly, which required that the SCT consider including ““appropriate provisions regarding technical assistance and capacity building for developing countries and LDCs [least-developed countries] in the implementation of the future Design Law Treaty.”

    To this effect, at the beginning of the week, the African Group issued a proposal [pdf], followed by a proposal on 13 December by the European Union. The African Group proposal requests the addition of four articles in the text of the treaty, while the European Union proposal [pdf] is a resolution supplementary to the potential treaty.

    According to the summary by the chair, both documents will become working documents at the next session. Paragraph 9 of the summary was divided into two distinct paragraphs each presenting one proposal. The one devoted to the African Group proposal now includes a mention which reads: “draft articles on technical assistance and capacity building to be integrated in the industrial design law and practice treaty.”

    Paragraph 10 of the chair’s summary was amended and now reads: “The SCT requested the Secretariat to publish them [the two proposals] as SCT working documents for further consideration of the committee at its twenty-ninth session.” On 13 December, given the very different nature of the proposals tabled by the two groups, and the fact that the EU proposals came late in the week, the SCT decided to give more time to delegations to study the proposals, and that equal treatment should be given to them.

    According to the chair’s document, the WIPO secretariat is requested to revise the document SCT/28/4 (Overview of provisions regarding technical assistance and capacity building in treaties administered by WIPO) to include the text of the provisions on financial assistance in the treaties referred to in Section 1 of document SCT/28/4 (Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances, Washington Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits, WIPO Copyright Treaty, and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty).

    The document should be complemented with detailed information concerning the current practices, in WIPO, of financing the participation of delegations in meetings of the assemblies of treaties administered by WIPO.

    This followed a discussion on the African Group proposal asking that developing countries and LDC contracting parties of the future treaty be granted “adequate financial assistance by WIPO to facilitate the participation of at least one delegate … in all ordinary and extraordinary sessions of the Assembly, and any inter-sessional meeting, working group, revision conference or diplomatic conference” in relation to the treaty and its regulations.

    Study Resuscitated

    Members agreed to reopen a study on the impact of the potential treaty, in particular on developing countries, after those countries refused to let go of the issue.

    On the first day of the meeting, the Development Agenda Group requested that discussions on the study on the potential impact of the work of the SCT on industrial design law and practice be continued, and that an agenda item be added to this effect.

    At the last session of the SCT, from 18-21 September, countries could not agree on future work on this study. The European Union and Group B developed countries found the study met the requirements of the terms of reference, while developing countries said more work should be done on the study and in particular to allow more application and IP offices in developing countries to provide answers to the surveys upon which the study was constructed.

    On 13 December, delegates spend the afternoon in informal discussions. It was agreed that the study would be reopened and two additional months would be given to collect additional responses from members, including members which had provided incomplete answers.

    Paragraph 11 of the chair’s summary was amended so that it now reads: “Following informal consultations among delegations, the Chair concluded that without prejudice to the work on the Draft Design Law Treaty, the Secretariat was requested to extending for an additional period of two months the surveys that were conducted in preparing the Study… in order to increase the available data sample by way of new responses, as well as by way of the possibility of amending or completing earlier responses. The Study should be updated for consideration of the SCT at its twenty-ninth session, taking into account additional replies received. The general structure of the Study should be maintained. Some delegations were of the view that such a request was on an exceptional basis.”

    This followed a request by Brazil on behalf of the Development Agenda Group, and the last sentence was proposed by the European Union. The numbering of the paragraphs will be changed as paragraph 9 was split in two paragraphs.

    The tentative dates for the 29th session of the SCT are from 27-31 May.

     

    Catherine Saez may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.196.189.229