SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Ten Questions About Internet Governance

On April 23 in Sao Paulo, Brazil, the “Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance,” also known as “NETmundial” in an allusion to the global football event that will occur later in that country, will be convened. Juan Alfonso Fernández González of the Cuban Communications Ministry and a veteran of the UN internet governance meetings, raises 10 questions that need to be answered at NETmundial.


Latest Comments
  • Justice Roberts seems to think that adjusting ones... »
  • These obscured negotiations appear to this reader ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    ITU To Hold High-Level Talks On “Innovation-Stifling, Rampant” Patent Litigation

    Published on 6 July 2012 @ 5:37 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    The UN International Telecommunication Union (ITU) today announced it will hold a high-level meeting on the global surge in standards-related patent litigation which it said is stifling innovation in information and communications technology.

    The high-level ITU Patent Roundtable will be held at the ITU in Geneva on 10 October 2012, and will include standards organisations, industry representatives, and government officials, the organisation said in a release. The ITU considers public interest groups to be represented by their governments.

    To be addressed will be a “growing lack of adherence to standards bodies’ existing patent policies,” as “standards essential patent” litigation rises. Topics will include: potential improvements to existing policy frameworks, entitlement to injunctive reliefs, and definitions of what constitutes a royalty base, it said.

    There will also be discussions on the relevance of current arrangements based on reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) patent policies.

    “RAND-based policies have thus far been an effective way of managing natural tensions between patent holders, standards implementers and end-users,” it said. “However, the definition of what constitutes ‘reasonable’, and whether or not holders of SEPs are entitled to injunctive relief are now emerging as major points of contention.”

    Standards are increasingly anticipating technologies rather than following them, the UN agency said, which affects the market. The ITU said it is the “pre-eminent global standards-making body,” and strives to balance both user and intellectual property requirements.

    Patent litigation is particularly affecting the ICT industry, it said, as key protocols in devices sometimes encompass as many as hundreds of patents. “If just one patent holder decides to demand unreasonable compensation for use of its intellectual property (IP), the cost of the device in which that IP is implemented can skyrocket,” ITU said. In addition, shipments are being impounded and held at docks.

    “There needs to be an urgent review of this situation: patents are meant to encourage innovation, not stifle it,” ITU Secretary-General Hamadoun Touré said in the release. “Acknowledging patent holders and user requirements, as well as market needs, is a balancing act. This timely multi-stakeholder roundtable will help press for a resolution on some of the critical issues.”

    Related Intellectual Property Watch article: A Bigger, Meaner Patent War, (IPW, US Perspectives, 25 June 2012).

    Below are quotes provided by ITU:

    Amy Marasco, General Manager, Standards Strategy and Policy, Microsoft Corporation: “Microsoft is pleased that the ITU is organizing this global event to explore current issues related to RAND licensing commitments made to standards-setting bodies. We look forward to participating in this timely discussion.”

    Knut Blind, Chair of Innovation Economics, Berlin University of Technology: “Standards and patents are crucial indicators of technological development, the central force driving growth in modern information and knowledge economies. However, complexity arises because, while patents restrict the use of technologies, international standards aim to make technologies globally-accessible. As a result, standards developers and patent holders are sometimes at odds, so I thank ITU for convening this roundtable to discuss the RAND-based IPR policies which should continue to mediate this fierce, but in general fruitful relationship.”

    Feng Pan, Deputy Director-General, China Communications Standards Association (CCSA): “International standards should represent globally-agreed best practices for the cutting-edge of technology, reflecting innovation occurring across the world. As a consequence, international standards bring all countries up to speed with the latest technological developments, enabling further, internationally-harmonized ICT development. Standards thus often demand the inclusion of patented technology, and CCSA looks forward to ITU’s IPR roundtable where standards-developers and patent-holders can express their concerns with RAND-based policies and suggest means of balancing the relationship between standardization and intellectual property.”

    Jongbong Park, Telecommunications Technology Association: “TTA is a standards developing organization (SDO) in the Republic of Korea and, given the imperative of cooperation and collaboration between national SDOs when developing international standards, TTA will definitely join other SDOs at ITU’s IPR roundtable to deliberate the IPR issues of critical importance to us all.”

    Yoichi Maeda, CEO of Telecommunications Technology Commission: “TTC in Japan is pleased to send an IPR expert to ITU’s roundtable on RAND-based patent policies to exchange innovative ideas that can guide future discussions on whether current patent policies and existing industry practices adequately respond to the needs of various stakeholders.”

    Florian Mueller, Analyst and author of Foss Patents blog: “Litigation over standard-essential patents is on the rise, worldwide. Judicial and regulatory decisions can help give meaning to FRAND, and this is the right time for leading standard-developing organizations to brainstorm about clear rules able to limit the scope of future disputes involving standards.”

    Michel Goudelis, European Patent Office: “Patents are an exception to the general principle of free competition and enterprise and accordingly need to be granted very judiciously, applying a rigorous quality policy. That policy includes taking into account all relevant documents accessible and revealing the state of the art, including technical standards, in order to ensure the granting of legally safe and transparent patents commensurate with the inventions they protect. EPO has a long-standing involvement in the area of standardization. It is committed by its mission to the delivery of high-quality services, to transparency and to advocacy. Therefore, we have signed agreements with the leading Standardization Organisations, such as ITU, IEEE and ETSI, to include documentation from standard developing organizations in our patent searching activities. We also pursue a harmonized approach in this field across the major economic regions. A first step has been reached with the enhanced technical cooperation of the EPO with the patent offices of the US, China, Japan and Korea, where patent harmonization with a view to improving and securing quality is a key perspective. We are convinced that patent litigation frequency and intensity can be significantly reduced through the institutional cooperation between the standardization and the patent systems.”

    Brian Scarpelli, Government Affairs, Telecommunications Industry Association: “TIA, a leading developer of voluntary industry standards and specifications for ICT industry, applauds ITU for convening a roundtable where reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) patent policies can be discussed with key stakeholders. TIA believes that RAND patent policies balance implementers’ need to access and use patented technology included in a standard with patent holders’ need to preserve their rights in a way that encourages them to innovate and contribute their inventive solutions to the standardization effort, making patented technology available to all on RAND terms and conditions. This roundtable is very timely, and we look forward to hearing from and engaging with others on this topic at October’s event.”

    Thomas Goode, General Counsel, Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS): “Since ATIS’ inception over 30 years ago, it has maintained a patent policy that balances the interests of standards-essential patents (SEP) owners and standards implementers. ATIS believes that it is important to provide the opportunity and incentives for SEP owners to make their intellectual property available for inclusion in standards, while allowing implementers broad access to such technology. ATIS is aware that disputes have arisen with greater frequency, recently involving RAND/FRAND issues. While such disputes have generally not been directed toward ATIS standards, ATIS is pleased to take part in the discussions being hosted by the ITU on this subject.”

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 157.56.229.247