SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Latest Comments
  • So simply put, we have the NABP saying that all ph... »
  • The original Brustle decision was widely criticise... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Meryl Streep, Other Top Actors, Urge WIPO To Finish Audiovisual Treaty

    Published on 21 June 2012 @ 3:55 am

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    World Intellectual Property Organization members yesterday resumed a 12-year-old top-level negotiation for a treaty on the protection of performers’ rights in audiovisual productions, this time with the eloquent urgings of some of the world’s top film and television actors to finish the job.

    The treaty is fairly high stakes for WIPO, which has not had a wholly new treaty in years (it has updated a couple), and for the multilateral system in general, which has been criticised for the inability of governments to reach agreements in those environments.

    The treaty negotiation – or diplomatic conference – is taking place in Beijing from 20-26 June. More information and all documents are available here.

    WIPO Director General Francis Gurry said in his opening remarks that there is universal agreement on the value of performers and the need to protect them. WIPO said today that more than 700 delegates attended the opening ceremony.

    The WIPO AV Treaty

    Negotiations on the short, 19-point audiovisual treaty stalled in the year 2000 after agreement could not be reached on Article 12, on the transfer of rights associated with performances. This time around, members have a tentative deal on that issue – essentially leaving it to the national level – and have a good likelihood of completing the treaty. The deal was reached in the WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) in June 2011.

    Related IP-Watch Article: WIPO Committee Sees Breakthrough On Audiovisual Treaty After 11-Year Delay, 24 June 2011

    Referring to the deal, the United States on behalf of the Group B developed countries said, “We are now in a position to conclude this treaty.” Doing so will reinforce WIPO’s role and show that the multilateral process can work, it said.

    The basic proposal is here.

    There still are issues to be worked out, however. There may be some disagreement over the inclusion of an Article 20 that contains provisions on enforcement of rights. This provision requires that countries have “enforcement procedures available under their law so as to permit effective action against any act of infringement of rights covered by this treaty….”

    Talks this week also will focus on additional explanatory provisions and overarching introductory language. Specifically, there likely will be discussion on administrative and final provisions to the text, plus three additional statements to accompany Articles 1, 2, and 15.

    Art. 1 deals with the relation of this treaty to other conventions and treaties; Art. 2 is the definitions; and Art. 15 relates to “obligations concerning technological measures,” requiring that contracting parties provide adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies against the circumvention of effective technological measures used by performers.

    And several regional groups, such as the African Group and the Group of Latin American and Caribbean Countries, are demanding that an additional clause be inserted into the treaty preamble recognising the importance of the 2007 WIPO Development Agenda. That agenda contains 45 recommendations aimed at infusing a development dimension into all WIPO activities.

    But all appear to agree on the need to get the treaty done, and now have the encouragement of top actors from their countries.

    In a video recording of actors from around the world, Oscar-winning American actress Meryl Streep urged negotiators to agree on the treaty as it is a “pivotal time in the performers’ battle for intellectual property protection,” due to digital technology. Spanish actor Javier Bardem explained that each performer is different, making each performance unique. Sonia Braga of Brazil told negotiators it is “absolutely necessary.”

    “The adoption of a new instrument would strengthen the precarious position of performers in the audiovisual industry by providing a clearer international legal framework for their protection,” WIPO said in a release. “Notably, for the first time, it would provide performers with protection in the digital environment.”

    WIPO also had an introductory press release explaining the processes, available here.

    Separately, in its opening remarks, the European Union said that it has been recognised as having competency on this treaty, and so can become party to it.

    African Perspective

    In its opening statement, the African Group, represented by Egypt, gave reasons why it supports the treaty. “To name but a few,” it said, it would be important to extend performers’ rights against unauthorised use of audiovisual performances to films and videos available on the internet, along the lines of the 1996 WPPT [the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty], especially when it comes to economic rights of performers in their unfixed performances, the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the right of rental, the right of making available of fixed performances and the right of broadcasting and communication to the public.”

    The instrument also will ensure, Egypt said, “that when a DVD is reproduced, sold, rented or broadcasted in a different country, equitable benefits will accrue to the country of origin, which can then be shared with performers.”

    It also said that the instrument will “grant performers moral rights to prevent lack of attribution or distortion of their performance.”

    “Indeed, for many actors and performers, especially in developing countries, the treaty will strengthen their economic rights and equitable and non-discriminatory benefit sharing,” the African Group said.

    Finally, it said, “the instrument contains sufficient flexibility for each WIPO member state to regulate, as part of their national laws, the best suited design to address the issue of transfer of rights from performers to producers.”

    Where Better than Beijing?

    Gurry and others said it is appropriate that the treaty be completed in China, which he said has a dynamic cultural sector. For instance, the country produced over 500 feature films in 2010 and had the largest number of television series in the world, he said.

    China joined WIPO in the 1980s and has risen in importance in the organisation. It is its own regional group at the organisation, the only single country to do so (it is not, for instance, part of the Asian Group). It also has its highest ever official in WIPO under Gurry, Deputy Director General for Brands and Designs Binying Wang. She has been notably reticent about press attention in the WIPO hallways.

    Several senior Chinese officials opened the ceremonies, with Chinese State Counselor Liu Yandong listing the progress the country has made in practice and in its observance of IP rights, while acknowledging the work still to be done by China, such as instilling a greater awareness of IP in its people and continuing to reduce infringement.

    “Respecting IP is … a mark of our civilization,” she said, and emphasised the importance of a balance between rights and the interests of creators, as well as taking into account the differences between nations and their unique situations.

    Members elected Liu Binjie, minister of the National Copyright Administration of China and president of the General Administration of Press and Publications, to be president of the conference. And closed discussions were held between regional group coordinators prior to the opening of the meeting, Gurry said.

    In his opening remarks, WIPO Assistant Director General for Copyright Trevor Clarke said, “This conference is called to deliver a baby that has been many, many years in the making.”

    At this point, it might be said, delegates have a pretty good idea what it’s going to look like, and all sides seem to be intent on bringing it into the world.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. La OMPI está firmando tranquilamente un acuerdo para darle a las estrellas de Hollywood su propia versión especial de Derecho de Autor | Partido Pirata says:

      [...] visto que su cultura floreció sin ella? Sorprendentemente, un funcionario chino en las reuniones anunció que : “El respeto de la IP es … una marca de nuestra civilización”, que parece ser [...]

    2. Diplomatic Conference on the Production of Audiovisual Performances | Intellectual Property Law Blog says:

      [...] the treaty is signed, it will be the first brand-new WIPO agreement in many years.  Click here for more details about the proposal and suggested processes for implementing [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 23.20.124.150