SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Latest Comments
  • So simply put, we have the NABP saying that all ph... »
  • The original Brustle decision was widely criticise... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    15 Years Later, Prospects For WTO Information Technology Agreement Examined

    Published on 15 May 2012 @ 8:01 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    The World Trade Organization this week celebrated 15 years of a tariff-cutting agreement on information technology products, and issued a publication charting the history of the agreement. Industry representatives invited to a symposium joined voices asking that the agreement be expanded, while some called for strategies to incorporate development into technology trade promotion. And a link was made between the agreement and a rise in patents on technology.

    The symposium on the Information Technology Agreement took place on 14-15 May and aimed at taking stock of the impact of the agreement since its inception, giving an overview of the latest developments in the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, and examining a further expansion of trade in ICT products.

    A number of the panels of the symposium have been recorded and can be accessed on the WTO website here.

    WTO Director General Pascal Lamy said at the opening of the session that ITA participants accounted for over 96 percent of world trade in IT products, and that the elimination of tariffs through the ITA “has substantially improved the affordable access to technology, in particular, for developing countries.”

    In recent years, he said, a shift “from passive consumption of ICT towards active use and participation in the production of ICT goods and services,” had been observed in low-income and least-developed countries.

    “It is my hope,” he said, “that through this outreach event, government representatives, policymakers, and trade negotiators can have an exchange of views and dialogue with the private sector, industry associations and also with academics on the latest developments in the ICT sector.”

    Lamy also launched a new WTO publication: “15 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Trade, Innovation and Global Production Networks” [pdf], retracing the history of the agreement and its effect on high tech global trade.

    “Fifteen years ago a group of visionaries overcame what at the time appeared to be insurmountable obstacles and negotiated one of the most successful sectoral trade agreements ever. Today, their successors, as I see it, have the responsibility to further expand that legacy,” he concluded. Lamy’s speech has been recorded and may be accessed here.

    The Ministerial Declaration on Trade in Information Technology Products (ITA) was concluded in 1996 and aimed at cutting tariffs on a list of information technology products covered by the agreement.

    Main product categories covered by the ITA, according to the new publication, include: “computers, semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, telecommunication apparatus, instruments and apparatus, data-storage media and software, and parts and accessories.”

    As of March, the ITA included 47 participants, representing 74 WTO members (with the 27 EU member states counted as one), according to the publication. It states that “while some progress has been made, outstanding issues (such as a review of product coverage and classification in relation to the World Customs Organization Harmonised System) remain in narrowing down the divergences in classification of ‘Attachment B’ products.”

    Attachment B contains items on the classification of which ITA participants could not agree. For example, in Attachment B computers are defined as “automatic data-processing machines” (ADPs) capable of performing certain specific functions.” Discussions to expand product coverage under the ITA are still ongoing.

    Patents in ICTs on the Rise for ITA Countries

    Wolf Meier-Ewert of the Intellectual Property Division of the WTO said at the event that IT as a general purpose technology facilitates innovation across downstream sectors. Developed countries as well as developing country members of the ITA have shown a rise in innovative activities.

    Patent activity in three main sectors of the ITA – computer technology, telecommunications and semiconductors – reveals that since 1996, a significant increase has been observed, although he said a lot of innovation escapes recording. This trend has been significant in ITA members, such as the United States, France, Germany or Sweden, but not in non-ITA members such as Russia, Brazil and Mexico, he said.

    “The patent system original function was to incentivise innovation by rewarding qualified technological inventions with a temporary exclusive right,” Meier-Ewert said. However, patents are increasingly used for strategic purposes, which can affect the system ability to deliver innovation, he said.

    There is a rising number of patents covering complex technologies, and potentially overlapping in the area of IT, in “patent thickets.” There is also a trend of increased patent litigation brought by non-practising entities, sometimes called “patent trolls,” which “focus on the acquisition and enforcement of strategic patent portfolios without themselves producing related products,” according to the WTO publication. Meier-Ewert said that both trends may block competition and discourage innovation in certain areas.

    Industry: Successful Agreement but Shows a Little Rust

    At the symposium, private sector representatives hailed the ITA as a successful agreement while almost drumming their fingers on the table in an impatient wait for a further expansion of products coverage and participating countries. “15 years is a very long time in our industry,” said an industry speaker, voicing the private sector concern about the difficulty to use the ITA when it comes to new products, in particular ones which can be used in different contexts.

    Robert O’Brian, director of market intelligence for US-based Corning Incorporated said, “the ITA should be proud of the crucial role played in the last 15 years.” But, he added, the ITA can be even more successful at it moves forward.

    Chih-Kung Lee, president of the Institute for Information Industry in Taiwan, concurred and said the need to expand product coverage and draw more participants is “now apparent and urgent.”

    For Akihiro Tanii, vice-chairman of the Trade Policy Committee of Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association, the ITA help boost the penetration of IT products, fostered economic growth, provided higher standards of living for people around the world, and contributed to innovation. However, the ITA needs to be updated regularly to adjust to new products arising from innovation and to include ITC products that are not currently recognised as such in the ITA.

    “With the WTO trade liberalization negotiations gridlocked, the WTO system has been unable to catch up with innovation by industry,” Tanii said, adding there is a need for “strong and tangible results [of ongoing discussions to expand or modify product coverage] to mark this 15th anniversary of the ITA.”

    ICTs, Innovation, Need to be Demand Driven in Developing Countries

    Paul Kukubo, chief executive officer of the state corporation Kenya Information, Communication and Technology Board, said social needs have “to be the basis for innovation.” He said the board felt the ITA was “extremely useful,” and that it could “certainly commit to be looking at the agreement from fresh eyes.”

    Developing countries are sometimes worried, Kukubo said, that as net importers of technology, opening markets could drive increased competition “when we are not yet fully ready to compete.” But in Kenya “we feel that already some of our companies which are doing quite well in the rest of Africa, and some indeed in the world … are ready for prime time.”

    “Remember that when this agreement was signed … a combination of people with technology and people with trade” was needed “to be able to understand this kind of agreements,” he said, before adding that at the time those competencies were probably lacking but “now we have a very nice pool of people who can straddle both,” he said.

    For Torbjörn Fredriksson, chief of the ICT Analysis Section, Division on Technology and Logistics for the UN Conference on Trade and Development, it takes more than infrastructure to optimise the ICT sector and proper legislation and regulation should be established to promote innovation but also to protect the users. There is a need for comprehensive strategies to reap the full development benefits from ICTs, he said.

    Partnerships between the private sector, civil society and governments are crucial, as it is very difficult for any one stakeholder to master the process to ensure maximum development benefits, he said. The innovation needs to move from supply to demand driven, and development objectives need to be put at the centre, he added, “and not just go for the latest technology and push it out.”

    A particular concern for UNCTAD, he said, is to promote the development of better data. “We still know far too little … and policy makers in developing countries have a hard time actually making policies and monitoring their policies” because they are lacking information about their ICT sector and “how they can make better policies to promote better use of ICTs.”

    Catherine Saez may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.82.22.63