SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Global Internet Conference Opens With An Air Of Possibility

    Published on 24 April 2012 @ 4:38 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    Maintaining openness and promoting access were two major themes that emerged during the Global INET conference opening session yesterday. A panel of key internet actors gave their perspectives on the past, present and future of the internet, in line with the conference theme, “Meeting at the Crossroads: Imagining the Future of the Internet.”

    The three-day conference, organised by the Internet Society, is taking place in Geneva through 24 April (IPW, 22 April 2012).

    Opening the panel of keynote speakers, Leonard Kleinrock, distinguished professor of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, presented the history of internet during his intervention, running through a dense 20-year timeline of some of its greatest milestones. He noted that the internet has been “growing exceptionally ever since day one and it continues to grow.”

    Integral to its inception, Kleinrock established ARPANET, the precursor to the internet, in 1969 at UCLA under the auspices the US Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). He emphasised the free and benevolent environment in which the internet was created.

    “The funding profile was long-term, with minimum interference,” Kleinrock said. “People could do what they wanted. It was very open.” He said that this kind of environment is conducive to creativity. The subtext of the importance of internet openness hardly needed to be stated and it was a theme that was revisited by the following key note speakers.

    The Future of Connectivity

    The theme of Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales’ intervention was the future of the internet. As a caveat, he quoted the speaker who came before him by saying, “It’s safe to predict that we will be unable to predict the future of the internet.” Nonetheless, he made two predications on the internet’s future.

    “No one will notice when Hollywood dies.” – Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales

    First, he banked on continued, widespread, worldwide connectivity in the future. “Imagine a world in which every single person has access to all knowledge,” he said. Second, he predicted that “No one will notice when Hollywood dies.” He said that in the same way that no one could imagine the death of the hardbound encyclopaedia in Wikipedia’s early days, that large scale collaborative video-making communities would destroy the film-making industry’s current model.

    “We will be rolling out nearly unthinkable bandwidth,” Wales said. “Communities will produce Hollywood-and-better quality films collaboratively and these will become more popular than Hollywood and it will destroy their model. Mass collaboration, mass creativity will change everything.”

    Hamadoun Touré, secretary general of the UN International Telecommunication Union (ITU), brought the conversation back to present day progress on making Wales’ first prediction, mass connectivity, a reality. He said that although progress has been made, there is still a lot of work to be done.

    “Two thirds of the world’s population still does not have access to internet,” Touré said. “Broadband networks must be considered in the 21st century as basic services, like roads, rail, and electric services.” He highlighted some of the global initiatives being pursued to achieve connectivity goals. For example, the ITU and UNESCO have set up a Broadband Commission for Digital Development in 2012 to encourage implementation of national broadband plans.

    Challenges to Openness

    Finally, Lynn St. Amour, president and CEO of the Internet Society, emphasised the importance of promoting internet’s openness during her intervention [doc]. “The internet has always grown organically, responding to needs of individuals and the network itself. Its distributed, open, and building-block structure has paved the way for years of amazing creativity and value,” she said. “The freedom that individuals have to provide online services without the approval of a governing body or central authority is critical to its utility and its value creation.”

    St. Amour noted that one of the main challenges to this open internet are restrictive examples for national legislation, citing proposed US legislation to protect copyright holders, such as the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA). She said that both of these proposals would have had a “negative impact” on the experience of internet users.

    Furthermore, she raised concerns over upcoming international proposals. “This year there are a number of international proposals that threaten to jeopardize some of the core principles of the internet. These proposals could result in countries assessing higher fees for data traffic – this would result in higher costs for everyone and raise the likelihood that some people would not use these services because they are more expensive,” St. Amour said.

    In defending an open internet, St. Amour called on conference participants to be “vigilant in defending the internet’s principles and continue to support the multi-stakeholder model.”

    Rachel Marusak Hermann may be reached at rachel@rachels-ink.com.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 107.20.129.212