Medicines Patent Pool Signs Deal With Indian Generics Producer

Published on 11 October 2011 @ 7:12 pm

By William New, Intellectual Property Watch

The Medicines Patent Pool, which negotiates voluntary licences for lower pharmaceutical prices, today announced the signing of an agreement with generics producer Aurobindo Pharma Limited to manufacture antiretroviral medicines. The Patent Pool has recently come under criticism from AIDS activists concerned about its July licence agreement with drug company Gilead, and it remains to be seen if this action will address their concerns.

The Medicines Patent Pool said in a release that the agreement “will enable Aurobindo to manufacture products licensed to the Pool by Gilead Sciences in July: emtricitabine (FTC), cobicistat (COBI), elvitegravir (EVG), and the fixed-dose combination of these medicines known as the Quad (a combination of FTC, COBI, EVG, and tenofovir). COBI, EVG and the Quad are new products in development. Their uptake by generic manufacturers will help close the gap between the arrival of new medical technology in developed country markets and its often delayed arrival in developing countries.”

In particular, it said, Aurobindo took advantage of a “key provision negotiated by the Pool so it can sell tenofovir to a larger number of countries and without paying royalties.” The Pool negotiated for its licences with Gilead to be “unbundled,” allowing a generic manufacturer to take up licences on a product-by-product basis. Aurobindo took licences on the other medicines but not tenofovir, for which there is no patent in India. This should make it possible for Aurobindo to sell tenofovir to a larger number of countries than before, the Patent Pool said in a release.

“The Pool’s patent status database indicates that there are several significant middle-income countries that were excluded from the Gilead licence that may now be able to purchase tenofovir from Aurobindo,” Patent Pool spokesperson Kaitlin Mara said in an ip-health listserv posting.

Those countries include: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Malaysia, Peru, Philippines, Ukraine, and Uruguay, she said, adding: “In addition, there are several middle income countries on which we do not have definitive patent data but on which there are potentially no TDF patents, including Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Panama, and Russia.”

Meanwhile, a newly launched petition against the MPP-Gilead agreement is being led by the International Treatment Preparedness Coalition, and is based on their assessment that the deal with Gilead represents a “setback” for people living with HIV, and that the process is not sufficiently transparent.

The petition is here. It calls for a renegotiation of the voluntary licence agreement, and a moratorium on agreements by the Patent Pool with Indian generics producers until a model can be created. The petition followed a 2 October meeting between activists and the MPP, and has dozens of signatures of individuals and groups.

Defenders of the Patent Pool’s Gilead agreement view it as having likely been the best possible at the time, and having moved the status quo further to the side of patients.

Denis Broun, executive director of UNITAID, which helped create the Patent Pool in 2010, said: “Competition from generic producers has been one of the most powerful tools to reduce drug prices. This agreement shows that generic manufacturers believe in the Patent Pool, and this is good news for people living with HIV across the developing world who will be able to access affordable, quality medicines.”

Another generics producer, MedChem, also entered into agreement with the Patent Pool, the release said.

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Categories: Education/ R&D/ Innovation, English, Patent/Design Policy, Public Health, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, WHO

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Comments

Medicines Patent Pool Responds To Critics Of Gilead Licence | Intellectual Property Watch says:
8 November 2011 at 1:38 am
[...] The licence agreement with Gilead has drawn criticism from some nongovernmental groups for not going far enough to open access to middle-income markets. The International Treatment Preparedness Coalition (ITPC) circulated a petition opposing the Gilead-Pool agreement (IPW, Public Health, 11 October 2011). [...]
Intérêt de l’entreprise et choix stratégiques : les licences concédées par Gilead au Medicines Patent Pool | Intellectual Property Watch says:
15 March 2012 at 12:19 pm
[...] Liens dans cet article : [1] The Patent Status Database for HIV Medicines [2] Medicines Patent Pool Signs Deal With Indian Generics Producer [...]

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Medicines Patent Pool Signs Deal With Indian Generics Producer

Comments

Leave a Reply