SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Bill Gates Calls For “Vaccine Decade;” Explains How Patent System Drives Public Health Aid

    Published on 17 May 2011 @ 11:03 pm

    By and , Intellectual Property Watch

    Microsoft legend Bill Gates is impassioned about helping to save lives as head of a large-scale foundation. Today, he explained to Intellectual Property Watch how intellectual property rights help drive that process forward and make it sustainable.

    Gates, chairman of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, spoke candidly to journalists after addressing the 64th World Health Assembly today. In his address, Gates called on governments to help take the world into a “Decade of Vaccines,” and predicted there will be five or six new vaccines available to all countries “at prices they can afford to pay.”

    IP rights play a role in that vision.

    Gates’ speech to the assembly is available here.

    “In terms of IP what we do is actually quite simple,” Gates said in response to a question from Intellectual Property Watch. “We fund research and we actually ourselves or our partners create intellectual property so that anything that is invented with our foundation money that goes to richer countries, we’re actually getting a return on that money.”

    “By doing that we have more money to devote for research into neglected diseases and the diseases of the poor,” he said. “Now when our medicines go into the poor countries, they are always going in without any intellectual property fee, at very lowest cost pricing.”

    “In fact,” he added, “we’re a pioneer of going to vaccine manufacturing to making volume commitments to allow them to build high volume facilities that are very, very low cost – so working with people on getting the prices down.”

    “But,” he said, “the intellectual property system has worked very well to protect our investments so that when they are used in rich countries we get a payback and then we have the control to make sure that it is not creating any financial burden on the countries that are the poorest.”

    Gates spoke to a standing-room only assembly hall with packed overflow rooms broadcasting his speech. He responded with some visionary language – in a computer-guy kind of way.

    “Thirty years ago, my colleagues and I envisioned a computer on every desktop,” he told the assembly. “Now, I join you in seeking access to good healthcare for every human being.”

    The vision for the decade also includes the need for countries to build delivery systems to deliver vaccines to “every last child.”

    Gates was particularly focussed on the eradication of polio, already about 99 percent gone from the earth.

    He also praised governments for maintaining their financial commitment to vaccines and immunisation despite budget difficulties.

    And he said pharmaceutical companies “must make sure vaccines are affordable for poor countries. Specifically, you must make a commitment to tiered pricing.” Some activists have said that tiered pricing, in which treatments are offered at reduced prices in poorer countries, still can be too high for many people.

    He said in the past, drug companies developed vaccines for rich countries, and it took more than a decade before they were introduced in poor countries, but that it is changing.

    Gates described efforts involving the WHO and an organisation called PATH to produce a vaccine at a target price of .50 cents that required a new approach to drug development around meningitis. The project “worked with a Dutch biotech company to obtain key raw materials and arranged a technology transfer from the United States Food and Drug Administration. Then, the Serum Institute of India agreed to manufacture the vaccine at the target price,” he said.

    “To keep the promise of equitable access to health care, all new vaccines must be priced low enough so that all countries can afford them,” he said in his speech. “The Gates Foundation is working with many vaccine manufacturers to ensure that vaccines are available at a reasonable price.”

    In sum, he said, vaccines are “one of the best investments we can make.”

    In the press briefing, Gates said that with advanced market commitments, in which companies are essentially promised a market for developing a drug, it might be helpful to have other companies from other regions become involved.

    He also made favourable remarks about generic vaccine producers and said there is room for expansion. High volume suppliers bring costs down, he said.

    Sanofi-WHO Neglected Disease Partnership

    Separately, at a side event tonight, drug maker Sanofi and the WHO celebrated the 10th anniversary of a partnership to fight neglected tropical diseases, and in particular human African trypanosomiasis, more commonly known as sleeping sickness.

    The aim of the partnership is to screen patients and give them early treatment, Robert Sebbag, vice president for access to medicines at Sanofi told Intellectual Property Watch.

    The company is spending US$ 5 million a year on the project, part of which includes the supply of the drugs, he said. Sanofi invented the three major treatments against the sickness. The remainder of the contribution goes to logistics.

    Since the beginning of the partnership, some 150,000 patients have been treated. Without treatment, trypanosomiasis is fatal, Sebbag said. There is also a sharp decline of new cases of the disease, he said.

    According to a WHO document, the partnership started with a 5-year commitment to fight trypanosomiasis. A second 5-year commitment expanded the scope of collaboration to include leishmaniasis, Buruli ulcer, and Chagas disease. Sebbag said the company had a moral responsibility to help address the problem.

    The partnership is now entering a third round with Sanofi in March making an additional 5-year commitment, until 2016.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. The Role of Intellectual Property in Global Health | BIOtechNow says:

      [...] can read the full article on Intellectual Property Watch’s website (subscription required).  |  Email [...]

    2. The Gates Foundation: Hand In Hand With Pharma « The Vaccine Xchange says:

      [...] as explained by Gates in response to a question from Intellectual Property Watch earlier this year (IPW, Public Health, 17 May 2011). Developing countries, meanwhile, have been fighting for the right to [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.234.42.16