SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Free Software Used To Fight Piracy, Broaden Knowledge Access In Ecuador

    Published on 22 April 2010 @ 10:26 am

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    A joint project being launched by a regional non-profit group along with the Ecuador’s intellectual property office (IEPI) aims to reduce software piracy by offering a free software alternative through public libraries. The initiative is meant to encourage the use of legal software and thereby lower the piracy rate.

    For the “Free Library” project, the Latin American Center for Intellectual Property Research for Development – known as Corporación Innovarte – has signed an agreement with the national IP office (IEPI), the Free Software Foundation of Ecuador and the associations of libraries. Corporación Innovarte aims to promote access to knowledge, innovation, and culture as tools for development.

    The project is meant to use libraries as a vector to build a distribution channel for free software available to users. Free software will be offered as part of the usual library collections. The initiative will disseminate free software among the population, serving two goals: offering people different options while supporting the “spread of educational and research possibilities,” and contributing to the limitation of illegal software use.

    According to the Free Software Foundation, free software allows the user “to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.” Access to the source code is a precondition for this. The copies can be redistributed either with or without modifications, for a price or free of charge “to anyone, anywhere.” Free software is a matter of liberty, not price, says the foundation’s definition of the term, which adds: “free, as in free speech, not as in free beer.”

    Free software advocates say that they are in favour of copyright as free software depends on copyright.

    The initiative is strongly supported by IEPI in Ecuador, according to Luis Villarroel, director of Corporación Innovarte, and former Chilean delegate to the World Intellectual Property Organization. “The Ecuador IP office is the first IP office to endorse a campaign of this type,” he told Intellectual Property Watch, making it a step to promoting the respect for copyright in a “positive and constructive way.”

    The project also was started in Chile, but the IP office has proved more reluctant to “support a campaign in favour of free software.” In this country, the NGO invited libraries to information workshops and approached libraries on a one-by-one basis. Libraries volunteering to participate were given “one or two CDs” containing the software, which they can lend, reproduce or even modify if they wish, Villarroel said.

    There is a pilot phase of the project in Nicaragua, and in Uruguay the librarians’ association has been approached in order to start the project later in the year. In Ecuador, the distribution of software is made through the library association and the free software community, he said.

    The financing of the project is a challenge and Corporación Innovarte is working on finding some additional funding. The free software companies might be asked to support the project with in-kind contributions, he said.

    According to Gina Brito, coordinator of the Ecuador Free Library project, in April 2008, Ecuador President Rafael Correa signed a decree allowing free software to be used in the state administration.

    There are 19 programmes in the CD distributed to libraries in Ecuador, she said, all of them usable on a Windows platform, and some alternatives to popular mainstream software. The software can be installed and the programmes come with a user’s guide.

    The project’s name is Biblioteca Libre and it is part of the campaign named “Legalízate.” This campaign means “legalise your activity by using free software,” according to Andrés Ycaza Mantilla, president of the Ecuadorean IP Office (IEPI). The campaign is based on “the understanding that one of the reasons for piracy is the high costs of ordinary software,” he told Intellectual Property Watch.

    IEPI has an active role in the Biblioteca Libre project but “it also currently supports anti-piracy campaigns organised by non-free software organisations, such as the Business Software Alliance,” he added. BSA produces statistics annually showing billions in lost revenues due to piracy. But some have questioned their calculation that any pirated version should be counted as a lost sale at full price.

    The campaign is part of IEPI’s campaign against piracy on internet, he said. “IEPI has a broad anti-piracy campaign called “Ecuador Original”. Biblioteca Libre is part of this campaign, Ycaza Mantilla said.

    The number of libraries involved in the project is not yet determined but IEPI would like to have “as many libraries as possible” but at the same time a minimum of infrastructure and organisation, Ycaza Mantilla said.

    At the same time, IEPI “supports the anti-piracy initiatives that have been done by the software industry. We believe that they have had a positive effect in fighting software piracy in the country, and wish that other international industries will follow their example in having a proactive role defending their IP rights in Ecuador,” he said.

    William New contributed to this story.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Mariana says:

      I highly appreciate the project. I think that this initiative should be followed on the international arena by libraries, no matter of what type they are – public, national, university.

    2. Free Software Enables Developing and Developed Countries to Unshackle Themselves From Intellectual Monopolies | Techrights says:

      [...] Watch has a decent new article about how “Free Software [Is] Used To Fight Piracy, Broaden Knowledge Access In [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.