SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »
  • 1. Cuál es el problema principal que se plantea en... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    UN Eyes Next Steps On Food Security; Biotech Pleased With Summit Mention

    Published on 26 November 2009 @ 6:12 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    The United Nations food agency is working to strengthen a global food security committee following last week’s World Food Summit in Rome, but key observers deplored the lack of firm commitments at the gathering, while industry welcomed the mention of biotechnology in the summit declaration.

    The UN Food and Agriculture Organization agreed to strengthen its Committee on World Food Security (CFS) during the organisation’s biannual conference on 18-23 November, which immediately followed the summit. It hopes to establish a stronger system of global food security governance, but some groups have voiced concern about funding and accountability of the committee.

    This follows a strategic objective of the 16-18 November World Summit on Food Security, which adopted a declaration that included the statement that the CFS should be a major component of a UN-wide global partnership for agriculture, food security and nutrition, a project initiated at a 26-27 January 2009 meeting in Madrid.

    The renewed CFS will include not only FAO and UN member states but also representatives of other international organisations, non-governmental organisations, private sector and civil society.

    The Rome declaration [pdf] adopted during the summit pledged efforts from members to meet the targets of the Millennium Development Goals by 2015 and set strategic objectives but activists denounced the absence of most of the head of states of the Group of 8 industrialised countries and the absence of concrete measures taken to tackle hunger.

    Although the summit produced commitments, FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf regretted that the declaration contained “neither measurable targets nor specific deadlines which would have made it easier to monitor implementation,” according to a UN press release.

    Strategic objectives were set in the declaration, such as the reversion of the decline in domestic and international funding for agriculture, food security and rural development in developing countries, the promotion of new investments to increase sustainable agriculture production and productivity.

    According to the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter, although the declaration may indicate a “promising era of global cooperation in achieving food security,” and emphasises the need for accountability at national and international levels, it is weak on issues such as the production and use of agrofuels, or speculation by commodity index funds.

    “The food economy today is characterised by the global supply chains and the importance of added-value production led by private corporations, who set the prices and link the producers to the consumers, without any sort of control and with often extremely high levels of concentration that represent a serious market failure,” he said.

    A parallel forum including over 600 people representing 450 organisations of peasant and family farmers, small scale fishermen, pastoralists, indigenous people and others was organised in Rome from 13-17 November. The Parallel Forum of Civil Society declared support for the renewed CFS but were concerned that the committee is lacking funding to achieve its programme. They also stated their refusal of “intellectual property rights over living resources including seeds, plants and animals.”

    Industry Welcomes Declaration Mention of Biotechnologies

    Paragraph 26 of the declaration recognised that the increase of agricultural productivity is key to meeting food demand and resources needed to increase productivity will have to be mobilised including “the review, approval and adoption of biotechnology and other new technologies and innovations that are safe, effective, and environmentally sustainable.”

    “We are obviously pleased to see a mention of biotechnology in the declaration,” Denise Dewar, executive director for plant biotechnology at Croplife, a global federation representing the plant science industry, told Intellectual Property Watch.

    The mention of the biotechnologies and innovations in the declaration is an encouragement for FAO members to use those technologies, she said, adding that the industry participation in the CFS is “a step in the right direction” to solve issues relating to climate change and food security.

    The declaration also proposed to “address the challenges and opportunities posed by biofuels, in view of the world’s food security, energy and sustainable development needs.” Croplife believes that with technology and proper crop management, food and fuels can be done “although food is the number one priority,” said Dewar.

    Although “very pleased” by the recognition of the use of biotechnologies to increase productivity in the declaration, that goal will be achieved only if “the committed resources are sustained, if research receives committed and coordinated government support, and farmers are effectively trained and supported in their adaptation needs,” Dewar said.

    On 1-4 March 2010 in Guadalajara, Mexico, the FAO will hold an international technical conference co-organised with the government of Mexico, on agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries. The event is co-sponsored by the International Fund for Agricultural Development. Major partners are: The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, the World Bank and the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Georgie says:

      Does anyone know – or know where to find – who, to date, has signed up to the Global Partnership for Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition and who hasn’t?

      It would also be interesting to know if it has received all or any of the funding it has been promised – is there a concrete basis to the complaints being made about its lack of resources?


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.