SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »
  • 1. Cuál es el problema principal que se plantea en... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Human Rights, Multi-Stakeholder Approach Are European Priority For Internet Governance

    Published on 18 September 2009 @ 3:06 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    Stakeholders gathered this week to discuss a European approach to the governance of the internet in the lead-up to the next global forum on the issue.

    The second European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG) took place in Geneva on 14-15 September and brought together some 200 representatives.

    Access to the internet, online privacy, social networks, cybercrime, and the future of internet were among the issues discussed over six workshops and four plenary sessions. The debates were supposed to feed the European contribution to the UN-organised Internet Governance Forum, taking place in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt on 15-18 November.

    Coming from the private sector, governments, parliaments, and civil society, EuroDIG participants agreed, according to a EuroDIG press release, that all stakeholders should be involved in policymaking and regulation, that the internet should be accessed in an equal way by all users, that privacy and data protection should be considered primary and that legislation preventing cybercrime should rely on existing instruments.

    The event was co-organised by the European Broadcasting Union and the Swiss Federal Office of Communications, with the support of the Council of Europe.

    According to participants in a Monday workshop the ability of users to access the content services applications of their choice is related to their fundamental right to freedom of expression, freedom of communication, and freedom of information.

    One workshop summary called upon “countries to adopt and enforce data protection laws covering all sectors, both online and offline, based on international privacy standards that are built on the rule of law, that support democratic institutions, and safeguard human rights like the EU Data Protection Directive and the Privacy Convention 108.”

    There is the need for a user-centric legal regulation so that the users are in control of their privacy, said Virginia Paque of nonprofit DiploFoundation aimed at stakeholder participation in diplomacy, who was the rapporteur for the workshop on personal and professional privacy. Data protection and self-determination must be included in the concept and design of applications and information technology projects, she said, adding that “increasing vertical consolidation between search engines and online advertising companies gives them unprecedented control over large personal information databases.”

    It is important to provide fair and equal access to the internet, said Jean-Jacques Sahel of Skype, summarising a workshop on net neutrality. Most panellists found that the openness of the internet should be guaranteed, in the interest of both users and providers. “Content is worthless if users are prevented” from accessing it, he said.

    A European forum on network management bringing together internet service providers, regulators, users, and applications providers should be initiated to work on latest trends, as well as on the implications for the market, network investment and innovation, said Sahel.

    Strategies against cybercrime should take into account human rights, including data protection, democracy and the rule of law, said Alexander Seger of the Council of Europe during a workshop on cyber security. “Our data are wanted by many,” he said, like financial services, search engines, social networks, governments for security, and criminals for cybercrimes.

    A key issue, he said, is anonymity on the internet, the lack of traceability and security should be enhanced through authentication. To tackle cybercrime, rather than devise new legislation, using existing ones would be preferable, such as the international standards against cybercrime from the “Budapest” convention on cybercrime and the guidelines for the cooperation between law enforcement and internet service providers against cybercrime adopted at the global Conference on Cooperation against Cybercrime in 2008 at the Council of Europe.

    Alun Michael of the United Kingdom Parliament, moderator of the workshop, said that a new model of “cooperative regulation», including all stakeholders participation, should be developed.

    In a workshop on what the internet will be like 2020, participants said that it should be different, with denser communication networks. Innovation will have to be fostered and policymakers provided with better guidelines. The European Commission has issued several documents on the issue, like the information and communications technology policy agenda for 2015.

    A key topic is trust and awareness in the context of the internet 2020. Concerning copyrights, “The younger generation does not believe in the regulatory regime anymore,” the rapporteur said. However, some copyright protection seems to be necessary even if the system of collective licensing might prove the most appropriate, he said. Session participants predicted that public media likely will lose market share and said it should adapt its activities in making content available.

    Social networks like Facebook and Twitter might become more prominent and peer filtering and peer reviewing might play a larger role but a stable legal framework, addressing privacy and human rights should be implemented. Information technology policies need to encompass a multi-stakeholder approach, said participants.

    The human right approach is fundamental for EU stakeholders as this theme was constant throughout all the workshops and plenary, said Lee Hibbard of the Council of Europe.

    The public service value in term of universal access was also a major issue. “We depend very much on the internet, it is no longer a luxury” but participants see it becoming a necessity, he said.

    The Council of Europe is working on those issues and on users’ empowerment. “Users need to be fully informed before making a choice,” he said.

    There will be a common drafting of a document based on the EuroDIG conference by all stakeholders, collecting the main issues and listing the main points of discussion as the European perspective for the IGF in November, Hibbard said.

    Summaries of the discussions of the workshops can be found at: www.eurodig.org

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Banderas says:

      Thank God we still live in a world where you can get internet privacy, even if it comes at a price. Since we the people have been deemed unworthy to maintain our own internet privacy, what has the world come to?


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.