SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »
  • 1. Cuál es el problema principal que se plantea en... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Record Cybersquatting Cases As WIPO Seeks New Trademark Protections

    Published on 16 March 2009 @ 11:03 am

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    A record number of cybersquatting complaints were filed at the World Intellectual Property Organization in 2008, and the organisation is preparing for a potentially much larger set of concerns as the launch of an unknown number of new domains approaches.

    WIPO is one of the locations complaints about rights over internet domain names may be filed. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the internet technical coordinating body, is working to open the internet broadly to new domains by late 2009. WIPO has made proposals to ICANN’s comment process for ways to minimise the impact on trademark owners of the new domain launch.

    ICANN’s decision to open the internet is a “watershed moment in the development of the domain name system and is of genuine concern for trademark holders,” WIPO said in a release. Rights holders have been asked by ICANN to come up with suggestions on how to address their concerns (IPW, Information and Communications Technology, 12 March, 2009).

    “The creation of an unknowable and potentially vast number of new gTLDs raises significant issues for rights holders, as well as internet users generally,” said WIPO Director General Francis Gurry. The broad expansion of domains in the open market could provide “abundant opportunities for cybersquatters to seize old ground in new domains.” Gurry told reporters at a press conference last week that there is “potential for strife,” and that it could become a “nearly unmanageable task” for trademark owners to monitor and protect their brands online.

    WIPO has proposed a “pre-delegation” procedure to allow trademark owners to protect their rights before a new top-level domain is introduced. The pre-delegation procedure was included in ICANN’s draft guidebook for applicants for new domains, and is being further finalised by WIPO.

    Now, WIPO also has proposed a “post-delegation” procedure for ICANN’s consideration. It would offer trademark owners a method for addressing concerns after award of a domain, and if concerns arise with the operator of a registry for certain domains. The WIPO proposal also contains expedited take-down measures.

    WIPO’s proposal was discussed at the early March ICANN meeting in Mexico City, and will be discussed further before the next ICANN meeting in Sydney in June, WIPO officials said. “It is our hope that ICANN will somewhat get behind this,” Gurry told reporters.

    WIPO set out its proposals in a 13 March letter to ICANN, available here.

    WIPO saw a record 2,329 complaints filed in 2008, an 8 percent increase over the previous year. Complaints at WIPO are filed under the Uniform Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), which is administered by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre. The centre handles cases involving generic top-level domains (gTLDS), such as .com, and country code top-level domains, such as .fr for France.

    [Update: the National Arbitration Forum, another ICANN-approved dispute resolution body based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, reported that it handled 1,770 domain name disputes in 2008.]

    To handle the increase in cases WIPO proposed in December a “eUDRP initiative” that would make the UDRP process paperless and electronic. Gurry said he hoped the idea is receiving favourable consideration by ICANN.

    The top areas for complaints in 2008 were biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, followed by banking and finance. Drugmakers are most active in fighting online sales of medications.

    From the UDRP’s inception through 2008, almost 44 percent of complainants in dispute cases filed were from the United States, and about 40 percent of the respondents also were in the United States. Nearly 80 percent of cases in 2008 involved the .com domain. Almost 30 percent of cases filed at WIPO were settled without a panel decision. Of the remainder, 85 percent of decisions were in favour of the complainant, WIPO said.

    The number of ccTLD cases filed jumped from one percent of the total in 2000 to 7 percent in 2007 to 13 percent in 2008, as more ccTLD registries are brought into the system.

    WIPO’s Arbitration and Mediation Centre will hold a conference in Geneva on 12 October, 2009 looking back at the first 10 years of the UDRP and ahead to the future.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Latest Cybersquatting Stats from WIPO | domain names | says:

      [...] Trends Antony Van Couvering, Mar.18.2009 WIPO’s Misleading Release Michael Geist, Mar.17.2009 Record Cybersquatting Cases As WIPO Seeks New Trademark Protections IP Watch, Mar.16.2009 Record cases of ‘cybersquatting’ in 2008: UN Reuters, Mar.16.2009 [...]

    2. Latest Cybersquatting Stats from WIPO says:

      [...] Trends Antony Van Couvering, Mar.18.2009 WIPO’s Misleading Release Michael Geist, Mar.17.2009 Record Cybersquatting Cases As WIPO Seeks New Trademark Protections IP Watch, Mar.16.2009 Record cases of ‘cybersquatting’ in 2008: UN Reuters, Mar.16.2009 [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.