SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    NGO-Industry Drug For Poor Countries Sets Non-Patent Standard

    Published on 5 March 2007 @ 4:09 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By Tove Iren S. Gerhardsen
    A new anti-malarial, non-patented drug available cheaply to the public sector is being hailed as proof that it is possible for the private and public sectors to overcome differences over patents and reach concrete results for public health in poor countries.

    The not-for-profit research organisation, Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), and the French pharmaceutical company, Sanofi-Aventis, are the partners behind the new drug, which soon will be available “non-patented for the public” in Sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere, a DNDi spokesperson told Intellectual Property Watch.

    Robert Sebbag, vice president of the Sanofi-Aventis access to medicines department, told Intellectual Property Watch that this was an “original partnership,” and the process had been a “discovery” for both partners. The idea had been to develop a malaria product that would be available for less than US$1, without filing a patent, and all three had now been achieved.

    The drug (to be named “ASAQ”) will be available at production cost to the public, meaning national public health systems, non-governmental and intergovernmental organisations, the DNDi spokesperson said. For this sector, it will be available cheaply (less than $0.50 per treatment for children under 5 years old, and less than $1 for older children and adults).

    Sanofi-Aventis also will sell it under a brand name (“Coarsucam”) in the private sector, meaning private hospitals and private pharmacies, with a third production cost version available in private markets in low-income countries such as Madagascar, Burkina Faso and Cameroon, Sebbag said.
    The drug will be available in three versions under different packaging, which NGOs such as Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have helped develop, the spokesperson said.

    For the private markets there also will be no patent, he said, adding that the idea is that “the rich have to pay for the poor,” he said. But even in the private market, big revenues are not expected, he said.

    The drug will be produced at Sanofi-Aventis’s manufacturing plant in Morocco, and the first orders are already underway to Africa. Ten countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have registered the drug and three are in the process, the DNDi spokesperson said.

    Sebbag said that the “needs are enormous” as there are half a billion malaria attacks per year, and the company’s strategy is “no profit-no loss,” meaning that these products are sold at production price. He said any generics company interested in producing the drug could have the file and do so, provided they met certain quality standards.

    In 2004, DNDi and Sanofi-Aventis brought together their dossiers that led to the new drug, but DNDi will manage the project, including looking into its benefits in India and Indonesia and following up with safety and efficacy, or pharmacovigilance, studies, the DNDi spokesperson said.

    “We are impressed that Sanofi-Aventis was willing to make this agreement,” the spokesperson said, adding that this bodes well for the prospects of the industry entering similar partnerships in the future.

    This is the first drug launched by DNDi, and the patent-free model will be the standard model for other projects as well. The spokesperson said that DNDi has no intention of allowing a patent to go through, as there is “no space for patents” in the realm of neglected diseases.

    The new product is a combination of two well-known drugs (artesunate and amodiaquine) and easier to administer than the older ones. ASAQ stands for: “Adapted” to patient needs of all ages, a fixed combination of two well-known drugs and following WHO recommendations, “Simple” as a once-a-day regimen easy to manage for the prescriber and the patient, “Accessible” as a non-patented drug, at an affordable price, “Quality” in terms of galenical (natural-substance derived) development, manufacturing and storage, the DNDi said.

    DNDi was set up in 2002 and is a partnership between public research institutions in Brazil, India, Kenya and Malaysia, the Institut Pasteur, MSF and the WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, as a permanent observer.

    DNDi aims to deliver 6 to 8 new treatments for neglected diseases by 2015, it said. ASAQ is the first drug in a special research partnership, for which has received support from the European Union and Oxford University, among others.

    Tove Gerhardsen may be reached at tgerhardsen@ip-watch.ch.

    Categories: News, English, Public Health

     

    Comments

    1. Intellectual Property Watch » Blog Archive » New Thinking On Biotech Patents From Industry Groups says:

      [...] may have made the lack of a patent a key component of its partnership (IPW, Public Health, 5 March 2007). DNDi did much of the initial development work for the drug, according to its [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 50.16.17.90