SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • Congratulations upon re-election;-WHO chief.Priori... »
  • Great article. Ms. Chan may want to read our book ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Members Debate As WIPO Sees Budget Surpluses, Busy Programme For 2008

    Published on 13 December 2006 @ 9:54 am

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By William New
    The member governments of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) this week furthered their involvement in WIPO’s programme and budget decisions and clarified their understanding of key efforts underway on personnel and new-building construction. But as WIPO declared it would have a budget surplus, members differed on how to spend it and some raised concerns that WIPO’s stated priority of development in 2008-2009 does not sufficiently reflect calls for a stronger development agenda at the UN body.

    An informal meeting of the WIPO Program and Budget Committee, scheduled for 11-13 December, ended early with members finishing work at midday on 12 December.

    A one-day meeting of the WIPO Program and Budget Committee Working Group will be held on 14 December, which will address the terms of reference for the Audit Committee and the WIPO Internal Audit Charter. The Audit Committee is in the second year of a two-year mandate, scheduled to end at the September 2007 General Assembly.

    WIPO is currently preparing its proposed 2008-2009 budget and programme of work, and under new rules, member states have an increased role. In its report to the Programme and Budget Committee this week, the WIPO secretariat said it now expects to have a budget surplus from 2006-2007 due to stringent spending controls and strong demand for its services such as patent processing. Fees from patent applications provide a significant portion of WIPO’s budget.

    WIPO expects income in 2006-2007 of CHF580 million, up 9.3 percent from its estimate of CHF531 million for that period. Income in 2008-2009 is projected to rise another 9.7 percent, and 8.8 percent again in 2010-2011, mainly due to higher than expected demand for its services related to international treaties on patents and trademarks.

    Early in 2007, WIPO will conduct consultations with members to determine how to use its potential surplus. In a paper prepared before the meeting, WIPO offered a number of options, including expanding programmatic areas of the organisation, specific investments such as upgrading the information technology infrastructure, or paying off part of the loan for the new construction project expected to begin in 2008. Finally, WIPO said a suggestion was made to lower patent fees. A combination of any of these also would be possible, it said.

    Other suggestions included better services or an increase in WIPO emergency reserves (from the 2000 General Assembly-approved 18 percent of biennial expenditures to the 2004-2005 external auditor recommendation of 25 percent). Some developing countries want the budget to reflect the proposed development agenda, including more technical assistance for developing countries, the participant said.

    Proposed Strategic Plan for 2008-2009

    The WIPO secretariat proposed five strategic goals for the next biennium, which must be approved at the 2007 General Assembly. These include: promoting a balanced IP system and realising its development potential; strengthening IP infrastructure, institutions and human resources; progressive development of international IP law; delivery of quality service in global IP protection systems; and greater efficiency of management and administrative support processes.

    According to the secretariat document for the meeting, the first goal would focus on promoting awareness of intellectual property, and reinforcing “linkages” with the rest of the United Nations system and all stakeholders, including non-governmental organisations. It also would include creating tools for policymakers to give them “a deeper understanding of the role and impact of IP on development,” plus improve the understanding of innovators, research institutions, small businesses and others.

    This goal also states that the development agenda under debate among WIPO members would considered “on the understanding that any agreed outcomes from the ongoing debate will be reflected in the implementation of all relevant programmes and activities of the organisation.” Finally, the goal would include examination of copyright in the online environment, with “consideration of how new business models and rights management technologies can promote access to digital content, including information in the public domain, while promoting creativity and addressing the interests of both owners and users of protected material.”

    During the discussion of the programme and budget on 11 December, Brazil, Ecuador, India, South Africa and others said it is important to ensure there is a focus on the development agenda, a participant said.

    WIPO’s second goal of strengthening IP infrastructure includes assistance for countries “for putting in place appropriate legislation” related to IP, including through new customised capacity-building plans for each country. Countries will have action plans with “clear criteria for evaluating success (benchmarks),” the secretariat said. This goal also includes a beefed-up programme for assisting member states in IP protection and enforcement efforts.

    On the third goal of the evolution of international IP law, the secretariat highlighted the need to address delays and quality in the granting of patents. It said members’ proposals for a new work plan for the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SCP) are due by the end of 2006. But regardless, the WIPO International Bureau will pursue a work plan that captures some members’ wish to harmonise the global patent system as well as other members’ wish to see progress on “broad policy issues concerning the role and impact of the patent system.” The bureau also will seek to keep WIPO as a forum for discussing patent issues. This year, developed nations are negotiating for patent harmonisation outside WIPO.

    On copyright, the WIPO committee on copyright and related rights will address limitations and exceptions to rights (such as for libraries and visually impaired persons), law related to infringements, and implementation of the WIPO treaties on copyrights and performers’ rights, “particularly regarding provisions on technological measures of protection,” it said.

    The secretariat also highlighted the need to improve ways to deal with increasing patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, mainly by moving more activities to electronic format. PCT applications are expected to increase by 6 percent in 2007, after gains of 6.4 percent in 2004, 10.8 percent in 2005 and an expected 5.6 percent in 2006, WIPO said.

    In other areas, WIPO also said it would begin a “dialogue” with employees who are on short-term contractual arrangements as they have expressed dissatisfaction with their status. Overall, staffing has remained at December 2005 levels with significant movement of workers within the organisation, the secretariat said.

    Desk-to-Desk Review Underway

    On a mandated “desk-to-desk” review aimed at determining that WIPO has the appropriate structure and levels of staffing to accomplish its mission, members increased their participation in the process. A selection team has chosen (from among several bids) consulting firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers to conduct the review.

    The review is expected to be completed by end of June, with preliminary results by end of March. Secretariat oversight is being provided by Deputy Director General Francis Gurry, who also oversees issues related to patents.

    Based on suggestions from the United Kingdom, United States and others, a two-day update of the process will be held in mid-January. According to participants, the first day will be a meeting of the WIPO Audit Committee, WIPO and the consultants. The second day will be an informal “open-ended” meeting with any interested member states.

    Member states also will receive the latest terms of reference for the project, the original proposal by PriceWaterhouseCoopers and the project path (such as timeline) before holiday break at the end of December, the sources said.

    New Construction Still On For 2008

    According to a secretariat document of 30 November, the multimillion dollar construction of a new adjacent office building for WIPO headquarters remains on track to begin in February 2008 and last 26 months to April 2010. The secretariat did not report in the document the results of a cost audit this autumn intended to assess new levels of cost for the project.

    Care is being taken in the construction process to ensure transparency. The selection board at its second session on 25 October selected Burckhardt+Partner SA, a Swiss architectural company expert in project management, to be pilot of the project, it said. A contract was signed on 22 November. A third selection board meeting will be held in February to consider pre-selection of companies interested in the construction project.

    The General Assembly last year approved the construction in part because WIPO pays significant rental costs each year for staff working at various spots around Geneva.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

    Categories: Features, English, WIPO

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.