• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WIPO Looks To Diversify Its Revenue Sources From High Dependence On PCT

10/09/2018 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The World Intellectual Property Organization Program and Budget Committee (PBC), a key member-state body at the UN agency, today opened a week of work on a range of issues. Opening the meeting, WIPO Director General Francis Gurry highlighted the positive financial status of the organisation but cautioned that external factors could make it risky to continue its heavy dependence on the popular Patent Cooperation Treaty.

The financial situation for WIPO is “overall very healthy and stable at this stage,” Gurry told governments. But it is “stable in an unstable world,” which means the agency does need to continue its policy of “exercising great caution.”

Gurry noted that as in recent years, WIPO’s income was higher than budgeted, since it typically uses a “cautious approach” in budgeting.

But the Patent Cooperation Treaty, under which patent holders in member countries can file an international patent to seek protection in other member countries, still makes up 75 percent of WIPO’s revenue, he said. In the last year, it again outperformed estimates, and is considered an “extremely important” system for the organisation, he said. The PCT has some 152 members.

Gurry noted that a “quite extraordinary” amount of work goes into the PCT both by WIPO and the governments.

For the next period, he said, WIPO expects some 260,000 international applications, which he said, “is a large, large number.”

Meanwhile, the Madrid system on marks also contributes a significant portion of the remainder of WIPO’s revenue, and is slowly seeing a steady increase in members, and is “now becoming a very interesting system,” he said, with the expectation of significant growth in coming years. The Madrid Union has 101 members, covering 117 countries, according to the WIPO website. Madrid system fees for 2017 were CHF 70 million, or 16.9 percent of the total, according to a PBC document [pdf] (see page 8), as noted by a WIPO press officer.

The third system managed by WIPO, the Hague system on industrial design, is a smaller percent of the budget but is “in movement,” Gurry said, making it more attractive and, WIPO hopes, an increase in demand. Well under 10 percent of WIPO’s revenue typically comes from government funding, unlike other UN agencies.

Gurry also reported on progress in WIPO investment strategy since it was given responsibility for its investment decisions last year. He said that while interest rates have been negative in Switzerland in that time, it appears WIPO has been able to avoid a negative result. The agency needs a longer term policy than the current 5 years, he said.

He also said the organisation is conducting an experiment with “netting” payments under the PCT, which by allowing net payments to be made could help reduce exposure of WIPO and member states to fluctuations in exchange rates.

New WIPO Program and Budget Committee Chair Andrew Staines today

Intellectual Property Watch prepared a full preview to this week’s meeting here (IPW, WIPO, 7 September 2018).

At the outset of the meeting, a new chair was named to lead the committee for the remainder of 2018 and 2019: Andrew Staines, UK Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative to World Trade Organization, World Intellectual Property Organization and UN, Geneva.

Another change announced is that the United Kingdom National Audit Office will take over the role of external auditor of WIPO, for a six-year term. The outgoing external auditor was Rajiv Mehrishi as the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WIPO Looks To Diversify Its Revenue Sources From High Dependence On PCT" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, English, Finance, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.