• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

China, Russia Are Most Restricted Countries For Digital Trade, Index Says

25/04/2018 by Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

A new European index measuring the extent to which 64 countries restrict digital trade found China at the top of the list, while New Zealand was the most open.

The Digital Trade Restrictiveness Index was developed by the European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE). ECIPE espoused the view in the report that restricted trade drives up costs for businesses and consumers, while free digital trade gives more access to consumers and helps business become more efficient and reach more customers.

“China applies sweeping regulatory measures in all aspects of digital trade, including trade in digital goods and services, investment in the information and communications technology (ICT) sector, as well as the movement of data and ICT professionals,” the report says. “China is followed by Russia, India, Indonesia and Vietnam. They all have very restrictive regimes for digital trade.”

It continues: “Generally, the countries that are most restrictive in digital trade are emerging economies. China belongs to that group, but it is also an outlier because the country imposes substantially higher restrictions on digital trade than other emerging economies. Just like China, Russia also applies more burdensome digital trade restrictions than could be expected given its level of economic development.”

On the other end of the spectrum, the most open country in digital trade, with only a few digital trade restrictions, is New Zealand, the index found. Others among the most digitally open are Iceland, Norway, Ireland and Hong Kong. These are the least restricted economies in digital trade and have free trade policies applied in most fields of the digital economy, it said.

“All Top Five countries in digital openness are comparatively small economies and therefore more
dependent on global markets,” the report notes. “Generally, they also have a larger services sector than other countries, which reinforces the role of open digital markets for their economic growth. All five countries have a
tradition of being open to international trade and investments.”

“Their digital openness boosts productivity and investments in so-called knowledge-based intangibles
such as research and development (R&D), design, (digital) training and data, which spurs growth in
digital and non-digital sectors,” it continues. “And the reality for all countries is that the combination of open digital borders and a friendly domestic regulatory climate for businesses expands economic prosperity.”

In Europe, the most restrictive countries are France and Germany, it said. France is in the top 10 most restricted worldwide. And for its part, the United States is about average for the world, having various restrictions that hold back certain sectors of its digital economy, the report said.

According to the report summary: “The Digital Trade Restrictiveness Index (DTRI) measures how countries in the world restrict digital trade. The DTRI is based on a wide spectrum of digital trade policies covering more than 100 policy measures across 64 countries worldwide. The index is the first global initiative to provide transparency of applied digital trade restrictions and sheds light on how countries compare with each other. The index is based on the Digital Trade Estimates (DTE), a database that ECIPE has developed and that is freely available for anyone to use.”

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"China, Russia Are Most Restricted Countries For Digital Trade, Index Says" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, English, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Other International Orgs, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Trackbacks

  1. Trade Trx New Zealand – Crypto Exchange Reviews says:
    27/04/2018 at 10:36 am

    […] China, Russia Are Most Restricted Countries For Digital Trade, Index Says – A new European index measuring the extent to which 64 countries restrict digital trade found China at the top of the list, while New Zealand was the most open. The Digital Trade Restrictiveness Index was developed by the European. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.