• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WTO Dispute Panel Set For Qatar IP Case; Appellate Body Appointments Still Stuck

22/11/2017 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

A World Trade Organization dispute settlement panel today was established on request of Qatar, which is challenging measures by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) taken in the name of anti-terrorism but which Qatar says unfairly violate its intellectual property rights and other WTO rules. Separately, also at today’s WTO Dispute Settlement Body meeting, members continued to be at odds over a closely watched disagreement on appointing new Appellate Body members.

The formation of the panel in the Qatar-UAE dispute was automatic on the second request by Qatar, after its first request was blocked in October (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 24 October 2017).

Qatar reportedly repeated today that the UAE’s actions constitute a gross violation of rights and violate WTO rules, denying the country the benefits of WTO membership and preventing freedom of transit rights.

The UAE for its part reportedly argued again that security issues are outside the purview of the WTO, and its actions are permitted under various WTO agreements – including the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS, Art. 73) – which contain exceptions for national security reasons.

Bahrain and Saudi Arabia spoke in support of the UAE, and the United States argued that the matter is political and should not be resolved by the WTO. Others echoing the notion that the dispute does not belong at the WTO were Yemen, Canada, Korea, Egypt and China, according to sources. Canada suggested the matter be elevated for a decision by the WTO director general.

After the panel was formed, 21 WTO members reserved their third party rights to participate in the panel proceedings:  Australia, Russia, Norway, the Philippines, Singapore, Ukraine, Chinese Taipei, Guatemala, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Canada, Korea, Egypt, the US, China, Honduras, Kazakhstan, Japan, the EU, and Afghanistan, the sources said.

The case is DS526: United Arab Emirates – measures relating to trade in goods and services, and trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights

Appellate Body

On another issue seen as a threat to the WTO dispute settlement system is the inability of WTO members to agree on how to replace departing members of the Appellate Body (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 25 October 2017).

At today’s meeting, Mexico put forward a new proposal on behalf of 52 proponents to conduct a simultaneous launch of the selection process for the three open spots on the Appellate Body, according to sources. But the United States again was alone in objecting, the sources said. As of 11 December the normally seven-member body will be down to four members.

At this point, the issue, which has been stuck since February 2017, could carry over to the next meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body on 22 January 2018.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WTO Dispute Panel Set For Qatar IP Case; Appellate Body Appointments Still Stuck" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, English, IP Law, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WTO/TRIPS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.