• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WIPO Trademark Committee Agrees On Work Programme For GIs, Action On Country Names

02/11/2017 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Statements were praiseful at the close of the World Intellectual Property Organization committee on trademarks, industrial designs, and geographical indications meeting today. After a number of unsuccessful past sessions, delegates agreed on a work programme on geographical indications. They also decided on a half-day information session on the examination by trademark offices of requests including country names, during the next session of the committee.

SCT Chair Adil El Maliki

The 38th session of the WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) was held from 30 October to 2 November.

Following informal discussions this week, delegates agreed on a work programme on geographical indications for the SCT. The work programme detailed in the summary by the chair [pdf] has two prongs. The first seeks to explore experiences and practices of different national and regional geographical indication protection systems.

Geographical indications (GIs) are collective intellectual property rights protecting products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation resulting from that origin.

GIs are protected under the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), Article 22. GIs are protected either through a sui generis system (like in the European Union for non-food products), or through trademarks, and certification marks (like in the United States, Australia, or Japan). Some countries accommodate both systems due in part to their engagement in bilateral or plurilateral trade agreements.

The second aspect of the work programme is about the protection of GIs on the internet, and GIs and country names in the domain name system (generic top-level domains [gTLDs] and country code top-level domains [ccTLDs]).

The WIPO secretariat is tasked with the compilation of a list of questions to be proposed by member states and intergovernmental IP organisations with observer status at the SCT, for consideration at the next session of the SCT. The date of the next session is not yet known. The SCT usually meets twice a year, once in the spring and once in autumn.

The questions will be structured around a list of topics including the basis of GI protection provided by national and regional systems, the application and registration conditions, the scope of protection, and enforcement measures.

Questions will also refer to the use and misuse of GIs, country names and geographical terms on the internet and in the domain name system.

The secretariat is expected to receive the questions by 6 February 2018, and should issue by end of February a document compiling the questions for consideration at the 39th session of the SCT.

After considering the document, the 39th session of the SCT will aim to issue a questionnaire for members and intergovernmental IP organisations with observer status, so that at its 40th session, the secretariat can present a document compiling the answers to the questionnaire.

At the last session of the SCT in April, Chair Adil El Maliki had proposed a work programme [pdf], but it could not be agreed upon (IPW, WIPO, 3 April 2017).

The approved work programme is based on the one submitted in April, with some changes. For example, the adopted document includes the enforcement of GIs protection, while the April draft does not.

Also, the April draft mentions the protection of GIs and geographical terms and country names in the DNS, while the adopted document focuses on the use and misuse of GIs, country names and geographical terms on the internet and the DNS, and the basis for protection “where appropriate.”

The mention of “unfair competition on the internet involving” GIs, which was in the April draft, is not longer in the adopted work programme.

Protection of Country Names Against Trademarks Registration

Delegates at the SCT also agreed on the convening of a half-day information session at the next session of the SCT. This information session will focus on the examination by trademark offices of trademarks consisting or containing country names, according to the summary by the chair.

The information session will focus on several areas, in particular on the issue of public domain versus distinctiveness, specific legislation, word mark versus composite mark, the perception of what is considered as a country name, and limitations and exceptions, it says.

Six areas of convergence on the protection of country names have been identified in the SCT since 2014: (1) the notion of country name; (2) whether the country name is non-registrable if it is considered descriptive; (3) whether the country name is not registrable because it is misleading, deceptive, or false; (4) whether other elements of the mark should be considered; (5) invalidation and opposition procedures; and (6) country names used as a mark.

The SCT is currently focused on areas of convergence 1, 2, 5 and 6 and member states were invited to provide comments and practical examples on how these principles are applied in their jurisdictions. Some 39 countries submitted comments [pdf].

According to the summary by the chair, member states are invited to continue submitting contributions.

Design Law Treaty

Still on the agenda of the SCT, the potential treaty on design law was not discussed. The inability to find agreement at the annual WIPO General Assembly in October on whether to convene a high-level negotiating meeting (diplomatic conference) to adopt the treaty led to a decision to push discussions on the subject until the 2018 WIPO General Assembly.

Constructive Atmosphere, Good Omen

At the close of the session, country groups expressed satisfaction with the result of the week’s work, underlining the constructive atmosphere conducive to agreement. Most of them also said they hoped it would be a good omen for the next WIPO committee meetings.

The next WIPO committee meetings are the 35th session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR), from 13-17 November, and the 20th session of the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP), from 27 November to 1 December.

 

Image Credits: WIPO. Photo: Emmanuel Berrod

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WIPO Trademark Committee Agrees On Work Programme For GIs, Action On Country Names" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Enforcement, English, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.