• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

At WIPO, US Plays Hypotheticals With Swiss Law On Disclosure Of Genetic Resources In Patents

02/06/2016 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

With discussions in full swing at the World Intellectual Property Organization on how to protect genetic resources in intellectual property rights, and in particular whether the disclosure of the source of genetic resources should be mandatory in patent applications, the United States has tabled a document hypothetically applying the mandatory disclosure legislation of Switzerland to a US patent.

IGC meeting this week

IGC meeting this week

The document [pdf] titled “Seeking a better understanding of Switzerland’s ‘Federal Act on the Protection of Nature and Cultural Heritage,’ and ‘Federal Act on Patent for Inventions’ by hypothetically applying them to U.S. Patent Number 5,137,870,” takes as an example a patent on antibiotics.

The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) is meeting from 30 May to 3 June.

The document, numbered as an official committee document, says “disclosure requirements have been characterised as simple transparency requirements, which will not be burdensome to patent applicants.” But it adds that the US review of disclosure requirements “however, suggest that this requirements will be difficult for applicants to satisfy, and that applicants will be required to disclose many sources of any genetic resources (GR) used at some point in making the invention, as well as those which could have been used.”

The law of Switzerland has been taken as a first example, the document says, and “if this exercise improves our understanding of the disclosure requirement in Switzerland, then we plan to undertake the same exercise using the laws of other World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) members.”

The document describes the different hurdles and risk of penalties and rejection of the patent met by the applicant if he had to comply with the Swiss legislations.

In conclusion, the document says, “Overall it is clear that the Swiss disclosure requirement is not a simple ‘check box’ requirement and considerable time would be required to determine whether and how to meet the requirement.”

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"At WIPO, US Plays Hypotheticals With Swiss Law On Disclosure Of Genetic Resources In Patents" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, English, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, WIPO

Trackbacks

  1. US Blindsides Allies Over Patents And Genetic Resources At WIPO says:
    05/06/2016 at 2:21 pm

    […] On 1 June, the US appeared to blindside its allies when it tabled, seemingly without consultation, a document [pdf] titled, “Seeking a better understanding of Switzerland’s ‘Federal Act on the Protection of Nature and Cultural Heritage,’ and ‘Federal Act on Patent for Inventions’ by hypothetically applying them to U.S. Patent Number 5,137,870,” which took as an example a US patent on antibiotics (IPW, WIPO, 3 June 2016). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.