• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

At UN Indigenous Forum, WIPO Gives Update On Negotiations

10/05/2016 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The World Intellectual Property Organization, a United Nations agency, today gave the UN in New York an update of ongoing negotiations for the protection of indigenous knowledge and genetic resources.

WIPO members are negotiating for possible sui generis (special) protection of genetic resources, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions (folklore) against misappropriation and misuse, a WIPO representative said.

The update was given by Hai-Yuean Tualima of Samoa, who is the WIPO indigenous fellow this year, speaking on behalf of the WIPO secretariat. She was addressing the 15th Session of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, taking place at UN headquarters in New York from 9-20 May.

The WIPO intervention is available here [pdf].

In the intervention, WIPO talks about efforts of the Intergovernmental Committee on Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC). It said, “While still being negotiated and therefore not yet agreed, the current drafts include Indigenous Peoples and local communities as the beneficiaries of the protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions and make provision for the recognition of and respect for customary law in national protection systems.

“The meaning, boundaries and contours of the ‘public domain’ are also much discussed in these negotiations,” it said.

WIPO claims to have taken “robust and consistent” measures to address concerns of indigenous peoples and local communities, and ensure their participation in the negotiating process. But it notes the voluntary fund set up to support indigenous participation in the meetings in Geneva is depleted.

Also, WIPO’s statement said, “At WIPO negotiation sessions, indigenous representatives contribute with important comments and proposals.” But it does not mention that historically, and presumably still, indigenous representatives have an elevated, but still limited, role in the negotiations and may only make proposals through a recognised government member state of WIPO.

WIPO also pointed to Article 31 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples [pdf], which mentions intellectual property rights.

Article 31 states:

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, sports and traditional games and visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.

2. In conjunction with indigenous peoples, States shall take effective measures to recognize and protect the exercise of these rights.

Meanwhile, the Permanent Forum at its 11th Session recommended that WIPO commission a technical review within the framework of indigenous human rights, to be conducted by an indigenous expert, focusing on the draft texts that have been developed within the WIPO negotiations.

The review was completed by James Anaya, professor of human rights law and policy at the University of Arizona (US), and will be presented on 12 May at a side event to the Permanent Forum. The discussion will include several other indigenous experts.

 

Image Credits: UN

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"At UN Indigenous Forum, WIPO Gives Update On Negotiations" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, Copyright Policy, English, Human Rights, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, United Nations - other, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.