• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Performer Lady Gaga (And Her Mom) Defend Internet Domain

09/02/2016 by Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Well-known performer Lady Gaga successfully gained ownership of a web address in the name of her foundation, according to a World Intellectual Property Organization document released today.

Lady Gaga

Lady Gaga

The domain, ladygagafoundation.com, was the subject of a domain name dispute filed at WIPO on 23 December 2015.

According to the WIPO dispute decision, the domain was filed by Deborah Allen of Orlando, Florida, with the purpose of blogging and possible sale of the domain.

For background, the WIPO decision states: “Complainant Stefani Germanotta, professionally known as Lady Gaga, is a performer and recording artist, and one of the most famous entertainers in the world. Lady Gaga’s company, Complainant Ate My Heart Inc., owns several trademark registrations for the mark LADY GAGA. The LADY GAGA marks cover entertainment services, apparel, and other goods and services, and the first use in commerce of the LADY GAGA marks goes back to September 2006.”

It continues: “In 2012, Complainant Lady Gaga and her mother co-founded Born This Way Foundation, a not-for-profit entity dedicated to ‘teaching advocacy, promoting civic engagement and encouraging self-expression, with a particular mission to empower young people with the skills and opportunities that will inspire them to create a kinder and braver world.’ The Internet website for the Born This Way Foundation is located at ‘www.bornthisway.foundation’. The home page at this website features a caricature of Lady Gaga.

The disputed domain name was registered on November 15, 2015. “It resolved to a website featuring a caricature of Lady Gaga almost identical to the one at the Born This Way Foundation website, according to the decision. The respondent’s website prominently stated that the Domain Name is ‘for sale’ with an asking price of USD 1,000,000. There was a ‘contact us’ hyperlink which reiterates the USD 1,000,000 sale price with the added word ‘negotiable’,” the decision said.

A cease-and-desist letter was sent on 1 December, to which the respondent replied that the website was for sale, that two offers had already been received (for $7000 and $4000) but that she would prefer to sell it to the Lady Gaga foundation itself.

Sometime after the takedown letter was sent, some blog posts were added to the website, which was given the headline, “This Lady’s Going Gaga.” It includes several blog posts asserting that Lady Gaga and her mother had spent more on “lawyers, publicity and consultants than on charity.”

The WIPO dispute panel found the domain name created in bad faith, and confusingly similar: “Complainant [Lady Gaga] clearly holds rights in its registered trademark LADY GAGA. The Domain Name incorporates this distinctive mark in its entirety and adds the descriptive word ‘foundation’. In the Panel’s view, this additional word does very little to reduce the confusing similarity between the famous mark and the Domain Name.”

The decision said the respondent did not reply to the complainant’s contentions. But the day after receiving the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center’s January 20, 2016 “Notification of Respondent Default,” the respondent sent the Center an email simply stating: “I bought this domain for my blog legally through go daddy domains. No one has the right to take it away.”

 

Image Credits: Michael Spencer

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Performer Lady Gaga (And Her Mom) Defend Internet Domain" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, Enforcement, English, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.