• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Polish Parliament Moves Toward Amending IP Law, Patent Registration Procedures

14/09/2015 by Jaroslaw Adamowski for Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

WARSAW — The Polish Parliament has drafted an amended industrial property law which is expected to facilitate the procedure for registering trademarks and reduce related costs, as well as introduce a number of other modifications to the existing regulations.

Alicja Adamczak

Speaking at the Polish Senate, the higher chamber of the country’s parliament, on 4 September, Alicja Adamczyk, who heads the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland, told senators [available here, in Polish] that Polish entrepreneurs often opt to register their trademarks at the EU’s Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM), as it takes only six months, compared with 14 months in Poland.

“The changes will surely result with an increased amount of applications to the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland, and with opting for the Polish procedure instead of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market in Alicante, Spain, owing to the fact that the domestic procedure is significantly less expensive – it costs 500 zloty [€119] if the application is made online,” Adamczyk said. “In the case of the applications to the OHIM, an online application costs €900.”

Under the plan, the amended law is to reduce the Polish procedure to six months.

Adamczyk said, “To date, due to our existing procedures and other obstacles which had existed until the drafting of these amendments, the procedure applied by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market had been not only easier,” but also “allowed to register trademarks which used the words Poland or Polish, while our procedure did not allow such a use.”

With the latest amendment, the Polish institution will start accepting patents which include the word ‘Poland’ which previously was not permitted. The amended law is also designed to proliferate online patent applications, as well as reduce the paperwork exchanged between the patent office and applicants, according to the office’s president. This said, the use of the Polish state symbols, or any symbols which could be found as offensive to any religious.

Before the senate voted on the draft amendments, they were also commented by senator Stanisław Iwan [available here, in Polish], who represents the opposition, and was appointed as the draft’s rapporteur.

“As a result of a debate which took place at a meeting of the [national economy] commission, we have decided to increase additional amendments. This is why, the initial fourteen amendments … were finally expanded to nineteen,” Iwan said. “The adopted solutions, which rely on making the procedures easier … are to have a positive impact on the competitiveness of the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland regarding the EU’s Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market.”

More specifically, according to the senator, Poland’s current regulations require the patent office to perform an ex officio research procedure following the submission of a patent application.

“This is different from the law which is generally applied in the European Union [where] such a research is facilitated and a decision can be obtained in a shorter time frame,” Iwan said. “The key element here is that, if there is no objection made by those who possess a given trademark, then the entire formal research procedure does not have to be performed [by the patent office].”

On 5 September, the set of amendments to Poland’s patent law [available here, in Polish] was passed by the Senate by a majority of 59 against 32, with no abstentions. Following the vote, the draft was returned to the parliament’s lower chamber, the Sejm, where it is to pass a final vote before it can be signed by the Polish president.

Should these requirements be fulfilled, the “law is to enter into force after a period of six months,” according to Iwan.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Jaroslaw Adamowski may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Polish Parliament Moves Toward Amending IP Law, Patent Registration Procedures" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, English, Europe, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Regional Policy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.