• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Imbalances In Global Economy Have Not Improved In 50 Years, Developing Countries Say

18/06/2014 by Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Catherine Saez

To mark the 50th anniversary of the funding of the Group of 77 developing countries. the group published a declaration reaffirming the needs of developing countries. The group, they said, was established to address imbalances in the global economy which still prevail today.

The declaration [pdf] by the Group of 77 plus China underlines the importance for developing countries to make use of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) for public health and access to medicines. The declaration also calls for developed countries not to take action against developing countries making use of such flexibilities, including trade measures.

The group further calls on developed countries and international organisations “to provide adequate financial assistance to support the transfer of reliable and affordable technologies and to promote capacity-building, taking into account national priorities.”

The declaration covers a wide range, calling for more South-South cooperation, reform of the international financial architecture, and for the international community “to redress the democratic deficit in global economic governance.”

They also ask that developing countries have a “rightful place” and participation in governance and decision-making institutions, and stressed the importance of the “central role of the United Nations in global economic governance.”

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Imbalances In Global Economy Have Not Improved In 50 Years, Developing Countries Say" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Africa, Asia/Pacific, Development, English, Finance, Health & IP, Latin America/Caribbean, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, United Nations - other

Comments

  1. Miles Teg says

    26/06/2014 at 9:46 am

    Beggars at the table, and a long walk away from Bandung… let’s see the 80s saw Surendra Patel still pushing for progressive policies at UNCTAD in the form of the Technology Transfer Agreement… decades later, after having being technologically colonized by WTO, the G77C asks for benevolence from the war-mongering democratic nations who spread death (ask Mandela about retrovirals) and destruction (chaos is fine in the South, Nobels go to warmongering Presidents and regional groups)?
    And UNCTAD is a shadow of its former self, wracked still by the Reagan Heritage Foundation study with John Bolton politics still ruling the roost. The UN WHO cannot save the 40 million invisible (mainly black) Americans without healthcare just like it must shut up on the decimation of the most effective and efficient health care system in the world – the UK NHS. Perhaps UN leaders need to include in their CVs whether they have a backbone or not – elementary evolutionary stuff, Watson!

    What institutional forms has the South developed to tackle these issues? Come on, one would have thought the South moved away from ‘the European Sahib is benevolent’ and built strong intellectual basis to lead this fight to deal with the rich country Think Tanks (or Tink, Thank$)… but they are still asking for capacity building and resources… hard to break the beggar habit, eh?

    Why can’t the South enforce rights that it has legally secured at the WTO under TRIPs? What point unity if it does not improve institutions and power base?

    The rich countries have the EU/OECD, etc and military and financial might.

    And the South does not know how to handle diversity enough to push through people-centred policies by building institutions capable of sustaining a long term agenda. How often it defends what it opposed. The South opposed TRIPs, but defends it in the face of Free Trade Agreements – ain’t that quaint. Is that not a measure of subjection?

    And the UN has fallen far from grace – UNCTAD tolerates a little dissent to keep the natives happy but it will be reined in if it ever did something progressive. It allowed itself to be dumped as the ‘trade is development’ forum by the formation of the WTO and did not even put up a good fight to defend its turf. Washington spoke and it cowered, just like Ban Ki Moon is doing now allowing the UNFCCC to be abused by the rich countries – a bureaucrat not a leader as the record aptly shows.

    The UN needs to take itself more seriously if it is to be more than the soft glove over the imperial fist… and the South, still mainly on the same agenda after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis… seriously??!!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.