UN Indigenous Rights Expert Says ‘Redskins’ Name A “Hurtful Reminder” Of Past Mistreatment 11/04/2014 by Caitlin McGivern for Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)James Anaya, United Nations special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, today called on the owners of the Washington Redskins Football team to recognise that the name ‘Redskins’ constitutes a “hurtful reminder” of the “long history of mistreatment of Native American people in the United States.” Though he stopped short of explicitly calling for a name change, Anaya argued that “the term ‘redskin’ for many is inextricably linked to a history of suffering and dispossession, and… is understood to be a pejorative and disparaging term that fails to respect and honour the historical and cultural legacy of the Native Americans in the US.” Anaya has previously touched upon this controversy. In a 2012 report on the situation of indigenous peoples in the US, he argued that “the use of stereotypes obscures understanding of the reality of Native Americans today and instead helps to keep alive racially discriminatory attitudes.” In that report he also noted that within the US many stereotypes still portray Native Americans as relics of the past, perpetuated by the use of Indian names by professional and other high-profile sports teams, caricatures in the popular media and even mainstream education on history and social studies. There has been increasingly vocal opposition to the name Redskins in recent years. Some Native American tribes have denounced it as offensive, and the Navajo Nation Council today formally opposed its use. A number of news outlets have said they will not use the name, and refer to it instead as Washington’s professional football team or just “Washington.” In 2013, President Barack Obama said that if he were the team owner he would “think about” changing the name. Team owner Dan Snyder has repeatedly said the name will not be changed, and that it honours Native Americans. Instead, he has established a foundation intended to benefit Native American tribes. In March, Snyder announced the creation of the “Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation” which aims to “provide meaningful and measurable resources that provide genuine opportunities for Tribal communities.” According to an article, in 2013 Forbes valued the franchise at $1.7 billion, of which $145 million is from the brand (though not specific to the name). Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Related Caitlin McGivern may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch."UN Indigenous Rights Expert Says ‘Redskins’ Name A “Hurtful Reminder” Of Past Mistreatment" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Dan Ballard says 11/04/2014 at 9:27 pm Why should anyone care what James Anaya thinks? In 2004, the National Annenberg Election Survey asked 768 people who identified themselves as Indian whether they found the name “Washington Redskins” offensive. Almost 90 percent said it did not bother them one whit. Reply
[…] UN Indigenous Rights Expert Says ‘Redskins’ Name A “Hurtful Reminder” Of …Intellectual Property WatchBy Caitlin McGivern for Intellectual Property Watch. James Anaya, United Nations special rapporteur on the rights of … Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.and more »…UN Indigenous Rights Expert Says ‘Redskins’ Name A “Hurtful Reminder” Of … […] Reply