• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WIPO: Internet Domain Expansion Disruptive To Trademark Strategies

17/03/2014 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The UN World Intellectual Property Organization today announced its concern over the effect on trademark protection of the current launch of potentially hundreds of new internet domains by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

“The unprecedented expansion of the Internet domain name space, until now dominated by .com and a handful of other generic top-level domains (gTLDs), is likely to disrupt existing strategies for trademark protection on the web,” WIPO said in a release.

“Trademark owners have been facing significant uncertainty in the expansion of the Domain Name System (DNS) while at the same time working with reduced protection budgets,” WIPO Director General Francis Gurry said in the release. “The proliferation of potential web addresses, with the expected roll-out of 1,400 new gTLDs, will force trademark owners to adjust their priorities in terms of registration and protection choices.”

“The exact nature of the impact we are unsure of at this stage but it is likely to be significant and disruptive,” Gurry said in a press briefing on 13 March. So far ICANN has approved more than 160 generic top-level domains (gTLDs). A gTLD is like .com.

The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center handles many cybersquatting cases under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedures (UDRP), and saw a significant increase in the number of domains involved in disputes last year (though the actual number of cases declined). The center also has been active in administering cases under the Legal Rights Objection (LRO) procedure aimed at protecting third party trademark rights, and issued a report on 69 cases in December.

On 11 February, WIPO received its first dispute case about one of the new top-level domains approved by ICANN (.bike, see case here). “This and other new gTLD cases now being filed with the WIPO Center will provide insight into how brand owners spend legal budgets in the new domains,” WIPO said in the release.

The WIPO announcement comes on the first day of the WIPO Committee on the Law of Trademarks (SCT), and also just days after the United States government announced it would step further back from its privileged oversight of ICANN.

WIPO also said the center conducted a review last year of the WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration Rules (WIPO Rules) that provide a framework for resolving disputes, and updated rules will enter into effect on 1 June 2014.

“The update of the Rules serves the WIPO Center’s goal to provide economical and productive dispute resolution procedures,” Gurry said. “The latest provisions, for example on emergency relief and multiparty arbitration, ensure that the WIPO Rules respond to the evolution of technology, business, and legal conditions.”

Separately, WIPO said that in December the center made available “tailored model agreements that companies involved in the telecom industry may use to refer a dispute concerning the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration.”

“Aiming to facilitate cost- and time-effective FRAND adjudication, these model agreements were developed in consultation with patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from various jurisdictions, including some members and the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI),” it said.

The release also cited the annual results of the center, for instance identifying that again retail, fashion, and banking and finance were the top three areas of complainant activity.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"WIPO: Internet Domain Expansion Disruptive To Trademark Strategies" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Enforcement, English, ITU/ICANN, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WIPO

Comments

  1. Jason Canon says

    22/03/2014 at 12:17 am

    The WIPO domain strategy had been faulty from the start. I hope to see tens of thousands of new TLDs established to put an end to this rediculous strategy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.