• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

German Parliament Passes Changes To National Copyright Law

02/07/2013 by Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The German Parliament on 27-28 June passed several changes to German copyright law and introduced limits and a financial cap on how much lawyers can charge for notices against file-sharers.

To transpose the European Union directive on orphan works, German copyright law now allows libraries, academic institutions, museums, archives, and historical film and audio institutions to digitise and give access to works for which no rights holder can be found after diligent search.

To include a general exception for orphan works (which would allow everybody and not only privileged institutions to make these works available) would be impossible, the legislative resolution reads.

At the same time, the Parliament passed a republishing right for content from publicly funded research. Authors will be allowed to make these works available 12 months after publication by a publishing company, even without consent of the publisher. The republishing aims at giving better access to publicly funded research and mitigate the asymmetry in the relation of big scientific publishers who push for exclusivity and individual academic authors who are interested in broad access to their works.

Critics warn that both copyright changes are not ambitious enough, as, for example, the right to republish only includes some types of works and excludes the “normal work” of academic staff.

Bigger steps were proposed in competing proposals from the opposition, for both better access to publicly funded works and caps for legal fees in file sharing cases. In 2011, some 218,000 notices were filed against file-sharers in Germany, charging €165 million euros in fees and damages from the alleged copyright violators.

Lawyers’ fees and investigation costs often had never been charged to represented rights holders. There are, the legislative resolution reads, “business models based on bulk notifications to users of copyright violations aiming at maximizing profits by claiming damages and investigative costs.” The new legislation sets a maximum fee for lawyers limiting the value of claims to €1000 euros.

The legislation likely would not fix the problem, as no cap was set for damages and language was too vague to protect users from quickly giving in to settle the cases outside of court.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Monika Ermert may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"German Parliament Passes Changes To National Copyright Law" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, Enforcement, English, Europe, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.